Joe A
_______________________________________________
Aeronca mailing list
Aer...@westmont.edu
http://mail.westmont.edu/mailman/listinfo/aeronca
|
|
|
|
Ian
On 31/08/2016 12:32 PM, Matt Slezak wrote:
> After reading replies and looking around the internet at all the STCs,
> they all seems to require O200 rods, O200 pistons, and an O200
> camshaft. So this doesn't look like a good option for more HP (i.e.
> just higher compression pistons). BTW anyone doing a Stroker just
> because they can't find a C85 camshaft there's 3 new on eBay for $900
> Continental Aircraft Camshaft for C-85 engine
>
>
>
>
> Continental Aircraft Camshaft for C-85 engine
>
> US $895.00 New in eBay Motors, Parts & Accessories, Aviation Parts &
> Accessories
>
>
>
> Also complete 4 cylinder C85 piston kits with rings (4 available) -
> this is dirt cheap the ring sets alone cost more:
> Continental C-85 Piston Set, P/N 40327 STD or +.015, with rings
> included
>
>
>
>
> Continental C-85 Piston Set, P/N 40327 STD or +.015, with rings
> included
>
> Continental C-85 Piston Set, P/N 40327 STD or +.015, with rings
> included in eBay Motors, Parts & Accessories...
>
>
>
>
> A yellow tagged O-200 camshaft for $400 here continental aircraft
> camshaft C-90 / O-200 yellow tag
> you are doing the Stroker:
>
> $ 400.0
>
>
>
>
> continental aircraft camshaft C-90 / O-200 yellow tag
>
> US $400.00 Remanufactured in eBay Motors, Parts & Accessories,
> Aviation Parts & Accessories
>
>
>
> Hope those eBay links make it to someone part searching now... really
> great deals.
>
> We'll see how much money I want to throw at the new C85 that arrives
> tomorrow, seems the best way for legal HP is to send off to Lycon
> Welcome to Ly-Con Aircraft Engines <http://www.lycon.com/> for the
> $1200 porting / flowing of cylinders. That is only if I don't have to
> replace the pistons / rings / cylinders (honing) in doing so.
> Supposedly gains around +15HP which would put it at 100HP at legal
> RPMs at a cheap price. But I'll just start at 85HP and can wait until
> whenever / if I want that upgrade...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Welcome to Ly-Con Aircraft Engines
>
> Ly-Con Aircraft Engines
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 6:55 AM, Thomas Holmes
> <thomasth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Joe,
> the O200 pistons are a little taller from the wrist pin to the crown.
> I just eyeballed it and decided that good was good enough!! ;-)
>
> Tampa Tom
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:02 PM, <j...@joea.com <mailto:j...@joea.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Anyone have an idea what the compression ratio is on the Don's
> Dream Machine engines?
> Am guessing that it sure is not 6.3 and would hope its higher than
> 7.1!
>
> Joe A
>
> On 30 Aug 2016 at 0:05, Matt Slezak wrote:
>
> >
> > I read online that the STC has several varieties. The
> > C85 has 6.3:1 piston compression ratio while the
> > O200 has 7:1. I can get new O200 pistons with rings
> > quite cheap right now. I also already have balanced
> > O200 rods. But reading online many say when you
> > put the O200 crankshaft in the engine performance
> > isn't any better than the stock C85. My new engine is
> > a C85 mid-time just thinking that a top overhaul will be
> > a few years out and why not add HP in a few years if
> > the price is right...
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Matt Slezak
>
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Aeronca mailing list
> Aer...@westmont.edu <mailto:Aer...@westmont.edu>
> http://mail.westmont.edu/ mailman/listinfo/aeronca
> <http://mail.westmont.edu/mailman/listinfo/aeronca>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aeronca mailing list
> Aer...@westmont.edu <mailto:Aer...@westmont.edu>
> http://mail.westmont.edu/mailman/listinfo/aeronca
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aeronca mailing list
> Aer...@westmont.edu
> http://mail.westmont.edu/mailman/listinfo/aeronca
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4649/12912 - Release Date: 08/30/16
I agree with most things you say, but have to take you to task on this!
It was the ALLIES won the war, of which America was a part.
Ian
Totally agree, it was a joint effort, most of the world against the Axis of Germany, Italy and
Japan.
The one thing that America brought to the effort was its production facilities. Along with our
allies we built the equipment needed to over-whelm our enemies. Just wish that we had
made a few more airplanes, jeeps, motorcycles and guns and put them in my hangar!! :)
Joe (who wishes we had a few leaders like Patton and Truman around these days!)
On 31 Aug 2016 at 17:04, Ian Harvie wrote:
> Doug
>
> I agree with most things you say, but have to take you to task on this!
>
> It was the ALLIES won the war, of which America was a part.
>
> Ian
>
>
> On 31/08/2016 2:53 PM, Doug Rounds wrote:
> > If it isn't certified under the present CAA/FAA rules you could be in
> > BIG trouble if you have persdonal anything--Lawyers are being fazed
> > out of the new magic electronic compter estates, Sorry Jerry, So if
> > you don't go by the in place rules you may have a bill to pay..
> > Computers and emails have ruined the country I grew up in--where let
> > the "Buyer Be Ware" ruled..If you invented the wheel today it would
> > take you years and mega insurance costs policies to get it approved
> > and by then all those that need your invention would be buried and
> > happyly flying in the Lords world....Doug PS--The world is
> > simple--the government rules are not. People are their own
> > ememies..And to think we won World War II in less than 4 years..
Doug -