On 10/30/2015 03:35 PM, Lorenzo Lucchini wrote:
> That was a quick reply! I'll have to study that a bit.
> I saw you also posted on the blog about the D90 receiving this
> information through a STATUS file in the EYEFI/ directory, is that an
> older method?
I _think_ so. I have some vague memory that they changed the protocol
on later versions of the card. I'm not sure how this would have worked
with older cameras, though.
You can always try to implement both things.
Which card do you have, btw? I'd love to get rid of my Eye-Fi cards.
They're basically doorstops now. Eye-Fi doesn't care about the old
cards at all.
> That doesn't work on my camera (a Nikon P7800), but
> honestly I'm not really sure I'm successfully tricking my camera into
> thinking an Eye-Fi is connected at all. The four files in EYEFI/ need to
> be 16384 bytes, right? Or did you have a better script to initialize the
> card somewhere?
Actually, the camera will recognize the card without those files if
memory serves. I think the volume-id of the SD card is the most
important thing. Maybe the volume name too?
See "-i" and "-n" in the mkfs.vfat manpage under Linux.