Sweet memory. Electronics these days no longer get designed, built and mfg with pride like this any more. HP is not like what it used to be either.
I know I sound old :-)
Irma
Paul Richer <paul_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "exlks" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to exlks+un...@googlegroups.com.
>To post to this group, send email to ex...@googlegroups.com.
>Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/exlks.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
BTW, I do know how to spell analyzer... That's what I get for using copy/paste. Maybe that's how Aussies spell it. Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android |
I wonder if it came with the little crow bar we shipped with it to get the cover off?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "exlks" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to exlks+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ex...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/exlks.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Cheers, Tom "Weird hou men maun aye be makin war insteid o things they need." -- Tom Scott (1918-1995)
I remember that 4 channel demo quite well! Those were definitely the days.
Good times, Tom, good times.
Paul.
Salsa (35670A) was the third and final evolutionary step for the Gazelle/Wonderland platform. The last time I looked (within the last year) they were still selling it. For roughly half (?) the project’s life, it was just a two-channel analyzer, but there was strong customer demand for four channels and the team wanted to intro with four channels. Management was unconvinced because they thought it would delay the project too long. Gaylord and 3 or 4 of the affected team members worked over the weekend to mock-up a four channel Salsa for management to see on Monday (perhaps based on the mock-up your team put together Tom). The effort paid off, and the Salsa we know was born. That team, headed by Gaylord, was fantastic!
Wayne (who the hell is he?) Smith
From: ex...@googlegroups.com [mailto:ex...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tom Bruhns
Sent: Wednesday, September 25,
2013 5:17 PM
To: ex...@googlegroups.com
As part of the program Tom mentions, we in marketing had a fantastic time getting “real signals” to use for Demonstration of our products….
You may all remember the dynamic signals CD’s….with our Road T-Shirts for intro which said….
A demo that’s loud attracts a crowd…
Regards,
Craig Short
From: ex...@googlegroups.com [mailto:ex...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tom Bruhns
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 5:17 PM
To: ex...@googlegroups.com
Jim
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mailto:exlks%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ex...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/exlks.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Hi Rick,
Tsunami was written in a UCSD Pascal variant ported to the HP 1000. I supported the compiler after we cut off the compiler company (Renaissance Software Inc.) for not ever finishing the compiler port.
Mike Hall
Wow, lots of familiar names from a long time ago. I remember Gazelle for its Smart Units (in addition to Objective-C), which were really cool. But, they were deemed too cool for our users and were turned off in the final version. I remember having to figure this out when a customer complained about saved traces being remembered incorrectly. Since Gazelle only stored the units string with saved traces, when it recalled a trace it had to covert the string to a smart unit. This worked fine for most normal units, but not so well for Power Spectral Density units (which don’t follow the normal rules).
While I came up with a solution to the specific problem, there wasn’t a really good solution to the general problem. And, the development system did not generate the same bits twice, so it was really hard to be confident that the only change was the intended one. In the end we bought the device back and the customer traded up to a Salsa and was very happy.
Gazelle also had an RS-232 port which provided access to the command line/interpreter which made it possible to interact with the objects, which made it much easier to figure things out.
Neel Malik / Senior Program Manager / Direct (425) 703-4332

Click in and do more.
Make the lawyers happy and read this:
This email message may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Wow, lots of familiar names from a long time ago. I remember Gazelle for its Smart Units (in addition to Objective-C), which were really cool. But, they were deemed too cool for our users and were turned off in the final version. I remember having to figure this out when a customer complained about saved traces being remembered incorrectly. Since Gazelle only stored the units string with saved traces, when it recalled a trace it had to covert the string to a smart unit. This worked fine for most normal units, but not so well for Power Spectral Density units (which don’t follow the normal rules).
While I came up with a solution to the specific problem, there wasn’t a really good solution to the general problem. And, the development system did not generate the same bits twice, so it was really hard to be confident that the only change was the intended one. In the end we bought the device back and the customer traded up to a Salsa and was very happy.
Gazelle also had an RS-232 port which provided access to the command line/interpreter which made it possible to interact with the objects, which made it much easier to figure things out.
Neel Malik / Senior Program Manager / Direct (425) 703-4332
<image001.png>
Cheers, Tom "Weird hou men maun aye be makin war insteid o things they need." -- Tom Scott (1918-1995)On 9/25/2013 1:34 PM, Mike & Jody McGrath wrote:
I agree, very fun! My recollection is that Gazelle was the overall project name and Roadrunner was the subgroup that designed the firmware. I was on Roadrunner...Jody McGrath
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Cauthorn <jim_ca...@hotmail.com>
To: Rich Wilson <ric...@gmail.com>; Paul Richer <paul_...@yahoo.com>
Cc: exlks <ex...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Sep 24, 2013 11:24 pm
Subject: RE: HP 35660A Dynamic Signal Analyser .
Very fun. Thanks for forwarding! Funny to see Gazelle (which never quite lived up to the name) after all these years. We should find this chap a nice .. what was it called? ... Roadrunner or something? (the much faster successor to Gazelle)
Since Gazelle was one of the first honest-to-goodness industrial applications of Objective C, perhaps it would merit a berth in a curiosity niche in an Apple museum somewhere... :)Best regards to all,
Jim
Cheers, Tom "Weird hou men maun aye be makin war insteid o things they need." -- Tom Scott (1918-1995)
Cheers, Tom "Weird hou men maun aye be makin war insteid o things they need." -- Tom Scott (1918-1995)
Since we’re wandering down memory lane . . .
My special memory from back in those days was my gjob of changing the coprocessor from the TMS32010 to the TMS320C25.
I can’t imagine doing something rebellious like that these days.
As Fred said, great memories and great technology.
--John
@Hoang: As fondly as I remember my days at LSID, I feel obliged to pay respects to those who paved the way for us.. So let’s also remember the HP 5420 (1977) and HP 3582 (1978) that introduced these techniques (and the phrase Dynamic Signal Analyzer—I think) MORE than 35 years ago!
@Mike: I never knew that the Pascal we used was based on UCSD Pascal! Perhaps because all the tools weren’t ported? Didn’t we call it “Modular Pascal” or something like that? Anyhow, thanks for this bit of trivia!!
@Jim: Wasn’t the overall Paragon SW called “HP Vista”? I’m surprised no HP lawyers went after Microsoft for “Vista” OS but I guess the current “HP” people probably don’t think about instruments too often L.
Take care,
James
Tom, I do remember at some checkpoint you quoting from Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. (Might have been someone else but in my mind I hear it in your voice.) I believe it was the following:
`Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?'
`That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,' said the Cat.
`I don't much care where--' said Alice.
`Then it doesn't matter which way you go,' said the Cat.
`--so long as I get SOMEWHERE,' Alice added as an explanation.
`Oh, you're sure to do that,' said the Cat, `if you only walk long enough.'
Alice felt that this could not be denied, so she tried another question. `What sort of people live about here?'
`In THAT direction,' the Cat said, waving its right paw round, `lives a Hatter: and in THAT direction,' waving the other paw, `lives a March Hare. Visit either you like: they're both mad.'
`But I don't want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
`Oh, you can't help that,' said the Cat: `we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.'
`How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice.
`You must be,' said the Cat, `or you wouldn't have come here.'
Hi James,
Not all the UCSD P-system tools were ported for use by Tsunami (HP3562). RSI wrote/adapted an M68000 P-Code Translator, Assembler, and Linker to go with the compiler. The “Modular Pascal” (aka Modcal) you remember was the compiler toolset used by Atlas (HP3561) which was also based upon the UCSD P-system.
Good Luck,
Mike
I have to say that I worked with some of the intelligent people in my life at Agilent and HP. I figured out how to get people talking again you just talk technology. What great discussions! Hope all of you are doing well both professionally and personally. Laura
HP5420A was called “Digital Signal Analyzer”. It’s origin is HP5450/51 “Fourier Analyzer”. I thought HP3562A was the first product that started to use the name “Dynamic Signal Analyzer”.
Jim Waite is right about Stamp & Envelope project. Stamp was canceled, but Envelope became HP-Vista. These projects started in Pascal. If I remember correctly, Dennis Obrien came up OOP scheme in Pascal, but later changed to Objective-C.
So nice to hear from you, all!
Yuji
From: ex...@googlegroups.com [mailto:ex...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of James Vasil
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:25 PM
To: 'HN'; 'Neel Malik'
Cc: 'Jim Waite'; mike...@agilent.com; rku...@alum.mit.edu; keith...@hotmail.com; blue_ho...@yahoo.com; 'Glenn Engel'; 'exlks'
I actually own a 3561A. It was sold as salvage by the medical device company I work for. The amazing resolution was used to test the ECG front end impedance flatness. It's an impressive machine.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Gary Heimbigner <gary_he...@soron.com> wrote:
This is really stretching some old memory cells, but the HP 3582A was formally called a Spectrum/Network Analyzer.
As I recall, the 3582 was also called BUFFALO, as inBarely Usable Fast Fourier Analyzer Like Object.The ASIC (or buffalo chip, I presume) had a buffalo in the artwork,and each time the ASIC was turned, they added another buffalochip to the artwork.(third hand information held for a long time in volatile memory;please correct me if I'm wrong!)Rich
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Gary Heimbigner <gary_he...@soron.com> wrote:
This is really stretching some old memory cells, but the HP 3582A was formally called a Spectrum/Network Analyzer.
As I recall, the 3582 was also called BUFFALO, as inBarely Usable Fast Fourier Analyzer Like Object.The ASIC (or buffalo chip, I presume) had a buffalo in the artwork,and each time the ASIC was turned, they added another buffalochip to the artwork.(third hand information held for a long time in volatile memory;please correct me if I'm wrong!)Rich
This is really stretching some old memory cells, but the HP 3582A was formally called a Spectrum/Network Analyzer.
Wow – I created the CAD Build Documentation for this product and still have a couple of drawing print outs. Great memories!
Thanks,
Paul.
From: ex...@googlegroups.com [mailto:ex...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Richer
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:31 AM
To: ex...@googlegroups.com
Subject: HP 35660A Dynamic Signal Analyser .
Check out this YouTube video about the 35660A FFT Analyser that many of us worked on. It is a recent tear-down and repair of an old unit with lots of comments of how well the product was designed.
Paul Richer
paul_...@yahoo.com
--
Hi Gary and Rich and all the gang,
Good to hear from you all and recall the good old days.
I have attached a highly magnified picture of the HP3582A digital filter chip from the HP Journal. You can actually see the buffalo.
To add to the story: As I recall, Management had decided that we needed to have code names for all the projects. They came up with some awful names and some nameless group of engineers decided one weekend to fix that. Monday morning each of the project modules had a name posted along with the explanation. The only one that really stuck was 'Buffalo' and as Rich said 'Barely Usable Fast Fourier Like Object'. Of course the fact that we were developing a chip for the project had something to do with the popularity!
Of course Gary introduced the 3582 to the world. I remember him standing with all 10 fingers in the air saying "256 parallel filters."
I am afraid that I was the one responsible for 'Dynamic Signal Analyzer'. When I took over the 3582 from Gary, I was working on a seminar with Santa Clara who called their product line 'Digital Signal Analyzer', even though it did not analyze digital signals. To keep the same initials and distinguish from swept spectrum analysis (which required quasi-static signals) I came up with Dynamic Signal Analysis. Mea Culpa....
John
Subject: Re: HP 35660A Dynamic Signal Analyser .
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 21:50:00 -0700
To: ric...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "exlks" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to exlks+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ex...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/exlks.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
<Buffalo Chip.jpg>
This trip down memory lane is wonderful. Rich is correct, the Buffalo chip used in the 3582 did have a buffalo on it, and behind that buffalo was a pile of chips designating the revision. The pile had gotten quite tall the last time I saw it years and years ago. I remember this little factoid because I was working in the old Loveland IC facility at the time, and walked over to the layout area one day to ask what all the laughing was about. We worked hard, but we did have fun!
Another interesting thing that Gary brought up was application note AN-243. When I left Agilent back in 2003, I hunted high and low for some of those classic notes, AN-243 being one of them. When I wound up at Tektronix, they actually became quite handy as educational aids to new engineers (and old engineers stuck in the time domain). We wound up doing some very interesting work using Tektronix ultra high speed 8 bit ADCs in a prototype for a digital high speed fiber data transmission network. Not much dynamic range, but oh how fast it was. When I retired, I had to go around and collect some of the old HP classics that had been loaned out. As with HP/Agilent, a complaint at Tek was the fact that there were so few really good applications notes being made anymore, as they were looking more and more like glossy sales brochures.
Start the rumor that Danaher (the company that bough Tektronix and Fluke) is going to buy the new EMG spinoff from Agilent! The headquarters will be in Everett (Fluke). Use Fred's theory that if it comes back around from a different source, it must be true.
Dave Nunnally-Class of 2003
Some of you may wish
to snag them while they are still there. ;-) Just search for
AN-243 at the Agilent home page, and you should get the same
list I just did.
Cheers, Tom "Weird hou men maun aye be makin war insteid o things they need." -- Tom Scott (1918-1995)
Actually Lynn Schmidt was the key player on the development of the digital filter IC and as the HP Journal article says, “Lou Scheffer (who) performed most of the chip device design and layout.”
Rich,You prompted me to go back and pull out my old 3582A training material. It turns out that I had a "senior moment" in my original response. The 3582A was actually called a Spectrum Analyzer to minimize the confusion in the transition from the HP 3580 which was an older low frequency swept spectrum analyzer.I'll be damned if I can remember the code name for the 3582A, but I seem to recall that the DSP filter chips were the ones referred to as BUFFALO. Nick Pendergrass and John Farnbach were the key players on the chip set. Anyone who remembers those two will appreciate how the idea of the "buffalo chips" came about. Talk about a couple of characters!Let me also add a bit of distant history. It seems that Santa Clara wasn't terribly excited to see Loveland (LID) doing a low cost FFT analyzer and sent a letter to the Division manager suggesting (demanding?) that we cancel the project. I will always remember Cullen Darnell who was the Section Manager explaining to the Division Manager in a meeting that he would "eat glass before he would cancel the project". That ended the conversation. Those were the good old days!
Sent from my iPad
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Gary Heimbigner <gary_he...@soron.com> wrote:
--This is really stretching some old memory cells, but the HP 3582A was formally called a Spectrum/Network Analyzer.
As I recall, the 3582 was also called BUFFALO, as inBarely Usable Fast Fourier Analyzer Like Object.The ASIC (or buffalo chip, I presume) had a buffalo in the artwork,and each time the ASIC was turned, they added another buffalochip to the artwork.(third hand information held for a long time in volatile memory;please correct me if I'm wrong!)Rich
Rich Wilson
ric...@gmail.com
Sent from my iPad
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Gary Heimbigner <gary_he...@soron.com> wrote:
--This is really stretching some old memory cells, but the HP 3582A was formally called a Spectrum/Network Analyzer.
As I recall, the 3582 was also called BUFFALO, as inBarely Usable Fast Fourier Analyzer Like Object.The ASIC (or buffalo chip, I presume) had a buffalo in the artwork,and each time the ASIC was turned, they added another buffalochip to the artwork.(third hand information held for a long time in volatile memory;please correct me if I'm wrong!)Rich
Rich Wilson
ric...@gmail.com
Some of you may wish to snag them while they are still there. ;-) Just search for AN-243 at the Agilent home page, and you should get the same list I just did.
Cheers, Tom "Weird hou men maun aye be makin war insteid o things they need." -- Tom Scott (1918-1995)
This trip down memory lane is wonderful. Rich is correct, the Buffalo chip used in the 3582 did have a buffalo on it, and behind that buffalo was a pile of chips designating the revision. The pile had gotten quite tall the last time I saw it years and years ago. I remember this little factoid because I was working in the old Loveland IC facility at the time, and walked over to the layout area one day to ask what all the laughing was about. We worked hard, but we did have fun!
Another interesting thing that Gary brought up was application note AN-243. When I left Agilent back in 2003, I hunted high and low for some of those classic notes, AN-243 being one of them. When I wound up at Tektronix, they actually became quite handy as educational aids to new engineers (and old engineers stuck in the time domain). We wound up doing some very interesting work using Tektronix ultra high speed 8 bit ADCs in a prototype for a digital high speed fiber data transmission network. Not much dynamic range, but oh how fast it was. When I retired, I had to go around and collect some of the old HP classics that had been loaned out. As with HP/Agilent, a complaint at Tek was the fact that there were so few really good applications notes being made anymore, as they were looking more and more like glossy sales brochures.
Start the rumor that Danaher (the company that bough Tektronix and Fluke) is going to buy the new EMG spinoff from Agilent! The headquarters will be in Everett (Fluke). Use Fred's theory that if it comes back around from a different source, it must be true.
Dave Nunnally-Class of 2003
From: ex...@googlegroups.com [mailto:ex...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary Heimbigner
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 12:59 PM
To: John Gibbs
Cc: Rich Wilson; James Vasil; HN; Neel Malik; Jim Waite; mike...@agilent.com; rku...@alum.mit.edu; keith...@hotmail.com; blue_ho...@yahoo.com; Glenn Engel; exlks
Subject: Re: HP 35660A Dynamic Signal Analyser .
John,
It was only five fingers for the filters. The other five were for the matching pseudorandom noise source spectral components.
Gary
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 28, 2013, at 11:01 AM, John Gibbs <ja_g...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi Gary and Rich and all the gang,
Good to hear from you all and recall the good old days.
I have attached a highly magnified picture of the HP3582A digital filter chip from the HP Journal. You can actually see the buffalo.
To add to the story: As I recall, Management had decided that we needed to have code names for all the projects. They came up with some awful names and some nameless group of engineers decided one weekend to fix that. Monday morning each of the project modules had a name posted along with the explanation. The only one that really stuck was 'Buffalo' and as Rich said 'Barely Usable Fast Fourier Like Object'. Of course the fact that we were developing a chip for the project had something to do with the popularity!
Of course Gary introduced the 3582 to the world. I remember him standing with all 10 fingers in the air saying "256 parallel filters."
I am afraid that I was the one responsible for 'Dynamic Signal Analyzer'. When I took over the 3582 from Gary, I was working on a seminar with Santa Clara who called their product line 'Digital Signal Analyzer', even though it did not analyze digital signals. To keep the same initials and distinguish from swept spectrum analysis (which required quasi-static signals) I came up with Dynamic Signal Analysis. Mea Culpa....
John
CC: james...@gmail.com; hoan...@yahoo.com; ne...@microsoft.com; jwa...@ieee.org; mike...@agilent.com; rku...@alum.mit.edu; keith...@hotmail.com; blue_ho...@yahoo.com; gle...@engel.org; ex...@googlegroups.com
From: gary_he...@soron.com
Subject: Re: HP 35660A Dynamic Signal Analyser .
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 21:50:00 -0700
To: ric...@gmail.com
Rich,
You prompted me to go back and pull out my old 3582A training material. It turns out that I had a "senior moment" in my original response. The 3582A was actually called a Spectrum Analyzer to minimize the confusion in the transition from the HP 3580 which was an older low frequency swept spectrum analyzer.
I'll be damned if I can remember the code name for the 3582A, but I seem to recall that the DSP filter chips were the ones referred to as BUFFALO. Nick Pendergrass and John Farnbach were the key players on the chip set. Anyone who remembers those two will appreciate how the idea of the "buffalo chips" came about. Talk about a couple of characters!
Let me also add a bit of distant history. It seems that Santa Clara wasn't terribly excited to see Loveland (LID) doing a low cost FFT analyzer and sent a letter to the Division manager suggesting (demanding?) that we cancel the project. I will always remember Cullen Darnell who was the Section Manager explaining to the Division Manager in a meeting that he would "eat glass before he would cancel the project". That ended the conversation. Those were the good old days!
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 27, 2013, at 9:14 PM, Rich Wilson <ric...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Gary Heimbigner <gary_he...@soron.com> wrote:
This is really stretching some old memory cells, but the HP 3582A was formally called a Spectrum/Network Analyzer.
As I recall, the 3582 was also called BUFFALO, as in
Barely Usable Fast Fourier Analyzer Like Object.
The ASIC (or buffalo chip, I presume) had a buffalo in the artwork,
and each time the ASIC was turned, they added another buffalo
chip to the artwork.
(third hand information held for a long time in volatile memory;
please correct me if I'm wrong!)
Rich
On Sep 27, 2013, at 9:14 PM, Rich Wilson <ric...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Gary Heimbigner <gary_he...@soron.com> wrote:
This is really stretching some old memory cells, but the HP 3582A was formally called a Spectrum/Network Analyzer.
As I recall, the 3582 was also called BUFFALO, as in
Barely Usable Fast Fourier Analyzer Like Object.
The ASIC (or buffalo chip, I presume) had a buffalo in the artwork,
and each time the ASIC was turned, they added another buffalo
chip to the artwork.
(third hand information held for a long time in volatile memory;
please correct me if I'm wrong!)
Rich
--
Rich Wilson
ric...@gmail.com
This trip down memory lane is wonderful. Rich is correct, the Buffalo chip used in the 3582 did have a buffalo on it, and behind that buffalo was a pile of chips designating the revision. The pile had gotten quite tall the last time I saw it years and years ago. I remember this little factoid because I was working in the old Loveland IC facility at the time, and walked over to the layout area one day to ask what all the laughing was about. We worked hard, but we did have fun!
Another interesting thing that Gary brought up was application note AN-243. When I left Agilent back in 2003, I hunted high and low for some of those classic notes, AN-243 being one of them. When I wound up at Tektronix, they actually became quite handy as educational aids to new engineers (and old engineers stuck in the time domain). We wound up doing some very interesting work using Tektronix ultra high speed 8 bit ADCs in a prototype for a digital high speed fiber data transmission network. Not much dynamic range, but oh how fast it was. When I retired, I had to go around and collect some of the old HP classics that had been loaned out. As with HP/Agilent, a complaint at Tek was the fact that there were so few really good applications notes being made anymore, as they were looking more and more like glossy sales brochures.
Start the rumor that Danaher (the company that bough Tektronix and Fluke) is going to buy the new EMG spinoff from Agilent! The headquarters will be in Everett (Fluke). Use Fred's theory that if it comes back around from a different source, it must be true.
Dave Nunnally-Class of 2003
From: ex...@googlegroups.com [mailto:ex...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary Heimbigner
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 12:59 PM
To: John Gibbs
Hi Glenn,A late Merry XMAS and Happy New Year wish to you.Not sure if you remember me, but I remember you and the nice memories when I worked at LSID (1984-1992) in various teams under Howard Hilton, Gaylord, Tom Bruhns, Fred Cruger, Phil ....This recent email thread on LSID HP DSA rekindled lots of our early work on DSP which has followed me since thenI am in a team that just launched on Kick Starter.com this "Internet of Kool Things" product which has quite a bit of DSP content, and the fundamental knowledge was acquired when I worked on HP LSID FFT-based DSA.I'd like to know if there is any rule in this exlks email group (I'm assuming you are the admin?) that prevents members from sending email to promote/market the sales of a new product or not?If not, I'd like to share the above link with the group to request help on "creating the buzz" for this KickStarter KoolThings campaign (by sharing the link via emails, facebook, Twitter messages to friends).This would allow us to mass produce this product with richer apps and cloud services.Please let me knowThanksHoang
Hi all –
Hope you are all doing great and had a incredible Christmas!
I concur about the teamwork at LSID… I often point to it as a great example of cooperation and accomplishment… and some great stories!
Take care and Happy New Year,
Mark
