Re: Far Cry 4 Launcher Crack
Theodora Glime
Since update to the latest version, my computer is slowing down substantially. Especially when I open Outlook or open a browser (Firefox or Chrome), the power usage would jump to as very high and the CPU would be up to 60%. Generally the CPU would be around 30% or 40% when I did not have anything open or running.
Try to find which application running in the OS background environment. such as the application running in system boot automatically. A idea could use to search the application. Sort the CPU usage from high to low, and then post the screenshot here.
Same problem. Kaspersky Lab launcher 30% CPU usage. Try switching it off and on again. So go to KIS settings, click on File Anti-Virus, make sure Security level is Optimal, turn File Anti-Virus off, save, confirm. You will receive warning notifications. Turn File Anti-Virus back on, save, confirm. Kaspersky Lab launcher should now be using 0 to 0.4% CPU usage.
Just went through the ordeal described on the microsoft page. Yes, finally found the culprits. It was not Kaspersky...I recommend to reserve 2 h or so, since you will go through frequent reboots. I had a scribble block next to me to note down which parts I disabled and what the RAM / CPU usage was after each step. Because after a few changes you turn mad ;-)
But in the end I was able to bring down RAM from 7.3 GB usage to 4.2 GB. Main memory eater was Docker Desktop which I only need from time to time but which after an update was configured to fire up each time Wnidows starts.
And also as a hint, even if I disable EVERYTHING according to the MS article I still have a MEM usage of 3.4 GB. So, at least on my computer (Lenovo Yoga C930 with 12 GB RAM and WIN10) the stories from people saying 2 GB is all that WIN and the basic services occupy is simply not applicable.
Hint #2: I also could not believe that the total of all programs / services listed in the MS resource monitor should amount up to the total RAM usage listed. But I sat down finally with a calculator and it is really adding up to this. So, no hidden VM mem eaters or whatever some people claim that there is in the dark shadows of your MS system ;-)
to add: CPU usage is high after system start, but then in all configurations leveled down to 1 - 4% after 60-90 sec after I saw my WIN desktop, no matter what system configuration I chose. After disabling all unnecessary crap, I finally arrived at 1%.
I figured to uninstall Kaspersky Total Security and remove the Kaspersky Extension from Google Chrome and guess what? From 20% ++ CPU usage, it decreased to 1.1 - 1.5%. My fan noise is not noisy as when Kaspersky was installed. The temperature is slightly better now.
If you want to install for all users, expand somewhere in /usr/local/ or /usr/share or /opt, then copy just the .desktop file into /usr/share/applications/. Tweak the paths in the copied file so it points where you actually put the complete application.
I've had a huge issue with using those directories because of permissions issues. I extracted with sudo in terminal using:
sudo tar xf visionclientlauncher.tar.gz -C /opt/
which worked. But now I can't figure out how to run the launcher .sh file because it's in a restricted directory.
Now that it's where I want it I'm having trouble making sense of the path inside the .desktop file.
The shell file is located at /opt/visionclientlauncher/apps/visionclientlauncher.sh and the path in .desktop file says...
So, Path=. means "use the current directory". Replace the dot with the absolute path to the folder containing the shell script. Then simplify the bash command line to not do the cd operation.
Same problem here, I even have the same certificate on the Ignition gateway and the ssl termination point in front of it (a web application firewall). Designer launcher works directly to the gateway, but not through the WAF (SSL Certificate not found). The certificate is trusted: LetsEncrypt.
All, not sure if it has been addressed elsewhere in the forums, but Designer Launcher using Self Signed certificates on a Gateway with redundancy needs to have the Subject Alternates included in the Master and Backup gateways. It will ask to trust both certificates. There should be a note in the section stating this is required for Gateways using redundancy.
@trungleduc Glad to recieve this reply, thanks. I already tried this and create a path named jupyter_app_launcher under the directory of jupyter data path, then created a jp_app_launcher_my_extension.yaml , customized my conten into this yaml file and it displays ok. But what confuses me is why neither compilation nor direct installation can display the samples contained in code.(jupyter_app_launcher/samples at v0.1.7 trungleduc/jupyter_app_launcher GitHub). In the installation or compilation progress , does it copy this yaml file to data path?
What do you think about adding functionality similar to jupyter-app-launcher into JupyterLab core say for 4.2. or 4.3? It seems like customization of the laucher seems like a common use case. In lab we could have a just a list of settings for it.
In order to change the default AutoCAD program that opens DWG files, exit any currently running AutoCAD product and launch the desired one. Shortcuts can be created on the desktop for different AutoCAD versions. Drag and dropping a DWG file onto the shortcut will open it in that version of AutoCAD.
Everythings is working fine, only the launcher (no matter if you call it an application or not) is not working. When I set up the dwg files to use the launcher it just does nothing. If I link it to Autocad LT whatever version it works. Starting Autocad and opening files also works. It is just the launcher that is not launching anything.
Run regedit, and when you get to have the registry editor looking as shown in the link, on the right pane, right clcik "OpenLaunch", modify, and change the year number to 2020. Repeat for "PrintLaunch".
I am having the same problem Caline has where the open and print strings are not in the registry. I've tried to manually add them as Ewoud suggested without success. Already did a clean uninstall of all Autodesk related files and reinstalled the new AutoCAD 2020 multiple times now. Opening .dwg files with the DWG Launcher still does absolutely nothing.... Open to any suggestions.
I know this is years after, but I found another work around without having to create a new account.
I install and launch DWG TrueView from here Where to download previous versions of DWG TrueView
This issue is still present. When some of our staff try's launching a MS office file from drive it will only give the option to open with Google Sheets or Docs. I have to tell them to back out of the open with screen that come up with a preview and try again. This works 50% of the time. This just isn't expectable.
I will state, that this seems to be only happening on Windows 10 machines, since the December update to Chrome I haven't had any issues with my Windows 11 machine. I will have to ask around and see if this is 100% the case with Windows 10 only.
Unfortunately, this issue is also still present on Windows 11. We've checked all the updates for Windows and chrome, deleted caches etc. However we have at least one member of staff who can still open with MS and Adobe apps- but we can't find any difference in settings or OS and browser versions.
February '24. This is still not working for anyone in my team.
I've updated Chrome to the latest version available to me: 122.0.6261.58 (Official Build) (64-bit). I've uninstalled and reinstalled the extension (From the old Chrome Web store). The new Chrome Web store does not list the application launcher - could this be anything to do with the issue?
This is really frustrating for teams managing files in a Google Workspace environment through Chrome who also have to open certain files in native software, such as complex excel workbooks or InDesign files. Any ideas of what to try next?
Dear colleagues, we are facing this issue now and the funny things that it works for some people and it doesn't for others. I tried to update, reinstall etc.. but still it did not work. I know the process is tedious re this darned app launcher.
This is just a wrapper launcher for Kerbal Space Program steam installs to bypass Take Twos KSP2 oriented launcher. Fully passes steam command lines to the KSP exe (unlike Take Twos) and properly sets up the working path, source code is here for all to view. Releases are here:
This is a .net core 3.1 app and will prompt you to install that if not present. May work crossplatform if you can install it too, no idea, I only tested on windows. It could probably be compiled to run under standard .net framework but I didn't want to bother because that's supposedly dying or something.
yeah I went with the newest .net core version because it has linux/mac support. Ironically, it doesn't help much/any because there are no linux/mac builds of this launcher yet (as it is unaware of their executable names), so need to either
Just thinking outloud. Anyone know if the *nix builds ship this new launcher gizmo? If it doesn't then why am I bothering lol? If it does, what's the executable names of the launcher and main game binary there?
My best guess at this moment is that the extra resources needed by the PDLauncher were the straw that broke the camel's back on people still using older 2 or 3GB VRAM GPUs. Getting rid of the PDLauncher may help on saving VRAM, that by itself will tax less the FPS.
@R-T-B, how hard would be to add a commandline option to your Launcher in order to create an environment variable called MONO_THREADS_PER_CPU and set it to 1 before launching KSP giving this new environment to it?
So people using it could try the stunt I proposed below and see if it improves performance on KSP itself, as well on the overall system. I have reports that suggest it does, but most people are not able of doing the trick themselves.
7fc3f7cf58