Check list for camera ready paper versions

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Paul Kaufmann

unread,
Jan 9, 2018, 11:18:05 AM1/9/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com
Dear all,

I have prepared a check list to simplify the validity checks for camera ready paper versions for track chairs: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QAdYjcAGDhaYc2YZWuj-hBUYbUURTBQix4a-GpaYZVk/edit?usp=sharing

I hope I have included all accepted papers but to be sure: would it be possible for you to have a look at the papers of your track in the check list?

After the submission deadline for camera ready papers: May I ask you to go through the camera ready paper versions of your track and check if all requirements are correctly prepared by the authors (there is an example in the check list)?

Thank you very much and best wishes
Paul

Sim, Kevin

unread,
Jan 10, 2018, 3:37:27 AM1/10/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com
Hi Paul / All

According to our instructions "References should be ordered by appearance in the paper, using 'splncs03.bst' as BibTeX "

As far as I can tell 'splncs03.bst' sorts references alphabetically. 'splncs.bst' sorts them in order of appearance but is an older file

Commenting out line 1474 of spllncs03.bst solves this
ITERATE {presort} --> %%ITERATE {presort}

We can easily fix ourselves when checking camera ready papers or change our instructions (again)

Kevin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "evoAPPS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to evoapps+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to evo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/evoapps/87C0AD22-88DC-4425-9429-0D317EC0DFAD%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
This message and its attachment(s) are intended for the addressee(s) only and should not be read, copied, disclosed, forwarded or relied upon by any person other than the intended addressee(s) without the permission of the sender. If you are not the intended addressee you must not take any action based on this message and its attachment(s) nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please respond to the sender and ensure that this message and its attachment(s) are deleted.

It is your responsibility to ensure that this message and its attachment(s) are scanned for viruses or other defects. Edinburgh Napier University does not accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from this message or its attachment(s), or for errors or omissions arising after it was sent. Email is not a secure medium. Emails entering Edinburgh Napier University's system are subject to routine monitoring and filtering by Edinburgh Napier University.

Edinburgh Napier University is a registered Scottish charity. Registration number SC018373

Anna Isabel Esparcia-Alcazar

unread,
Jan 10, 2018, 4:42:53 AM1/10/18
to Sim, Kevin, evo...@googlegroups.com, Juan Jesus Romero Cardalda, antonio...@um.edu.mt, Mauro Castelli, Lukas Sekanina, Manuel López-Ibáñez, Arnaud Liefooghe
(including other conf chairs too) 

So, can someone please advise what to reply to this author? (apart from "Sorry but my name is not 'Hey' ")

Hey,

thank you for the camera ready instructions. I have one question/clarification though.

In the instructions it is written that: 

"References should be ordered by appearance in the paper, using 'splncs03.bst' as BibTeX style (if you use LaTeX)…”

However, 'splncs03.bst' downloaded from the Springer website (https://www.springer.com/gb/computer-science/lncs/conference-proceedings-guidelines)
sorts the references into an alphabetical order. It is also stated in the file itself: "The order in the reference list is alphabetical by authors.”.

On the other hand the ‘splncs.bst’ found from the same latex2e zip orders the references by their appearance: "Based on the BibTeX standard bibliography style `unsrt’”

I assume that the wanted order is the order of appearance and the reference just points to the wrong .bst file.

Best Regards,
Simo Linkola


From: evo...@googlegroups.com <evo...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Sim, Kevin <K....@napier.ac.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:37 AM
To: evo...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Check list for camera ready paper versions
 

Paul Kaufmann

unread,
Jan 10, 2018, 4:59:43 AM1/10/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com, Sim, Kevin, Juan Jesus Romero Cardalda, antonio...@um.edu.mt, Mauro Castelli, Lukas Sekanina, Manuel López-Ibáñez, Arnaud Liefooghe
I can do this. Anna, could you please forward me the complete email for the email address? Thank you.

> On 10. Jan 2018, at 10:42, Anna Isabel Esparcia-Alcazar <aesp...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> (including other conf chairs too)
>
> So, can someone please advise what to reply to this author? (apart from "Sorry but my name is not 'Hey' ")
>
> Hey,
>
> thank you for the camera ready instructions. I have one question/clarification though.
>
> In the instructions it is written that:
>
> "References should be ordered by appearance in the paper, using 'splncs03.bst' as BibTeX style (if you use LaTeX)…”
>
> However, 'splncs03.bst' downloaded from the Springer website (https://www.springer.com/gb/computer-science/lncs/conference-proceedings-guidelines)
> sorts the references into an alphabetical order. It is also stated in the file itself: "The order in the reference list is alphabetical by authors.”.
>
> On the other hand the ‘splncs.bst’ found from the same latex2e zip orders the references by their appearance: "Based on the BibTeX standard bibliography style `unsrt’”
>
> I assume that the wanted order is the order of appearance and the reference just points to the wrong .bst file.
>
> Best Regards,
> Simo Linkola
>
> To post to this group, send email to evo...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/evoapps/HE1PR0301MB2249E1B7F8DF6D2EAE58B0F0B0110%40HE1PR0301MB2249.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com.

cag...@ce.unipr.it

unread,
Jan 11, 2018, 5:17:42 AM1/11/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com
The main point is to have the bibliography of all papers sorted
homogeneously.

My suggestion is to remove the indication to sort it by appearance and
just ask to use splncs03.

That minimizes tha hassle, since there is no need to modify the stylesheet
and all papers should be ordered according to the same criterion.

Stefano
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/evoapps/HE1PR0301MB2249E1B7F8DF6D2EAE58B0F0B0110%40HE1PR0301MB2249.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com.

cag...@ce.unipr.it

unread,
Jan 11, 2018, 5:26:56 AM1/11/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com
I can download them with the same limitation highlighted, by which it
works only WITHOUT setting any filter.

Stefano

cag...@ce.unipr.it

unread,
Jan 13, 2018, 2:40:38 PM1/13/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com
So, in the end, did we decide to accept alphabetically-ordered references
or should we edit the splncs03.bst file to have them sorted by appearance
?

I mean, how should I prepare my camera-ready ?

Stefano
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/evoapps/AM6PR0102MB34631A34E952231FCD6D93FBD5110%40AM6PR0102MB3463.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com.

Anna Isabel Esparcia-Alcazar

unread,
Jan 14, 2018, 11:50:04 AM1/14/18
to cag...@ce.unipr.it, evo...@googlegroups.com
This is what we say in the web instructions:

---
References should be ordered by appearance in the paper, using the modified 'splncs03.bst' as BibTeX style (if you use LaTeX), or generating a list with this order if you use Word. In case you would like to use the original ‘splncs03.bst’ BiTeX style file downloaded from Springer’s web page, please comment out line no. 1474: ‘ITERATE {presort} —> %%ITERATE {presort}’.
---

So, if you download *our* splncs03.bst, the change is already made so that ref are in order of appearance.
If you download Springer's version, you must make the modification


From: evo...@googlegroups.com <evo...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of cag...@ce.unipr.it <cag...@ce.unipr.it>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 7:40 PM
To: evo...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Check list for camera ready paper versions
 

J. Ignacio Hidalgo

unread,
Jan 15, 2018, 1:39:32 PM1/15/18
to EvoAPPS Chairs
The paper for EvoPAR is in the list

============================



J. Ignacio Hidalgo

Asesor para el área de Deporte
Vicerrectorado de Extensión Universitaria, Cultura y Deporte

Associate Professor
Adaptive and Bio-inspired System Research Group

Profesor Titular de Universidad
Departamento de Arquitectura de Computadores y Automática
Universidad Complutense de Madrid


============================
La información contenida en este correo es CONFIDENCIAL, de uso exclusivo del destinatario/a arriba mencionado. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, notifíquelo inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su eliminación, ya que ud. tiene totalmente prohibida cualquier utilización del mismo, en virtud de la legislación vigente. Los datos personales recogidos serán incorporados y tratados en el fichero 'Correoweb', bajo la titularidad del Vicerrectorado de Tecnologías de la Información, y en él el interesado/a podrá ejercer los derechos de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición ante el mismo (artículo 5 de la Ley Orgánica 15/1999, de 13 de diciembre, de Protección de Datos de Carácter Personal).
  Antes de imprimir este correo piense si es necesario: el medio ambiente es cosa de todos.
This message is private and confidential and it is intended exclusively for the addressee. If you receive this message by mistake, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please inform the sender and delete the message and attachments from your system, as it is completely forbidden for you to use this information, according to the current legislation. No confidentiality nor any privilege regarding the information is waived or lost by any mistransmission or malfunction. The personal data herein will be collected in the file “Correoweb”, under the ownership of the Vice-Rectorate for Information Technologies, in which those interested may exercise their right to access, rectify, cancel or protest the contents (article 5 of Organic Law 15/1999 dated 13 December, on the Protection of Personal data).
  Before printing this mail please consider whether it is really necessary: the environment is a concern for us all.
============================

Paul

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "evoAPPS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to evoapps+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Giovanni Iacca

unread,
Jan 16, 2018, 2:29:33 AM1/16/18
to EvoApps
Dear all,

We are currently validating the camera-ready files for EvoComNet. I've found one inconsistency among all papers, that I actually find every year. In the consent to publish form, it seems that nobody really knows what is the title of the volume and the book editor(s)... I've already seen already 4 or 5 different values in those fields in the submissions for EvoComNet.

I've seen that in the camera-ready instructions online there's a note about the editor names at the very end of the page (http://www.evostar.org/2018/submission_camera_ready.php) - I guess many authors missed that though - but still there isn't a clear indication of the title of the book/conference name. Maybe also this information should be stated clearly in the instructions? Or, even better, would it be possible in the future to have the consent to publish forms pre-filled for the four conferences?

Cheers,

Giovanni

cag...@ce.unipr.it

unread,
Jan 16, 2018, 3:32:35 AM1/16/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com
The name of one Editor (Kevin Sim et al.) and "Proc. EvoApplications
2018" has always been more than enough for Springer.

Stefano

Giovanni Iacca

unread,
Jan 16, 2018, 3:37:08 AM1/16/18
to EvoApps
For three evocomnet submissions and one evoknow submission, so far I've seen that one author indicated as volume "EvoSTAR 2018", one "21st European Conference on the Applications of EvolutionaryComputation, evostar 2018", one "21st European Conference on the Applications of EvolutionaryComputation", and one "EvoApplications 2018". 

You can see there's some confusion. :)
--
Giovanni Iacca, Ph.D.

Sim, Kevin

unread,
Jan 16, 2018, 3:51:43 AM1/16/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com, pablo.gar...@uca.es

Dear All,

 

I had meant to fill the copyright form in (attached) and post on the web.

 

Pablo could you post the form on the Apps page to make the instructions clearer for our authors.

 

Regards

 

Kevin

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "evoAPPS" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to evoapps+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to evo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/evoapps/CABtRnVrZLPpfbvjsY%2BU6o1mfqDxOiEjQEFCRYyhP-GQAZ7uj2A%40mail.gmail.com.


For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

This message and its attachment(s) are intended for the addressee(s) only and should not be read, copied, disclosed, forwarded or relied upon by any person other than the intended addressee(s) without the permission of the sender. If you are not the intended addressee you must not take any action based on this message and its attachment(s) nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please respond to the sender and ensure that this message and its attachment(s) are deleted.

LNCS+Copyright+Form.pdf

Giovanni Iacca

unread,
Jan 16, 2018, 3:54:50 AM1/16/18
to EvoApps, pablo.gar...@uca.es
Thanks, Kevin.

What about the currently uploaded copyright forms? Should we ask the authors to resubmit them?

Giovanni

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Sim, Kevin <K....@napier.ac.uk> wrote:

Dear All,

 

I had meant to fill the copyright form in (attached) and post on the web.

 

Pablo could you post the form on the Apps page to make the instructions clearer for our authors.

 

Regards

 

Kevin

 

From: evo...@googlegroups.com [mailto:evoapps@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Giovanni Iacca
Sent: 16 January 2018 08:37
To: EvoApps <evo...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Check list for camera ready paper versions

 

For three evocomnet submissions and one evoknow submission, so far I've seen that one author indicated as volume "EvoSTAR 2018", one "21st European Conference on the Applications of EvolutionaryComputation, evostar 2018", one "21st European Conference on the Applications of EvolutionaryComputation", and one "EvoApplications 2018". 

 

You can see there's some confusion. :)

 

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:32 AM, <cag...@ce.unipr.it> wrote:

The name of one Editor (Kevin Sim et al.) and "Proc. EvoApplications
2018" has always been more than enough for Springer.

Stefano



 

--

Giovanni Iacca, Ph.D.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "evoAPPS" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to evoapps+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.


To post to this group, send email to evo...@googlegroups.com.

This message and its attachment(s) are intended for the addressee(s) only and should not be read, copied, disclosed, forwarded or relied upon by any person other than the intended addressee(s) without the permission of the sender. If you are not the intended addressee you must not take any action based on this message and its attachment(s) nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please respond to the sender and ensure that this message and its attachment(s) are deleted.

It is your responsibility to ensure that this message and its attachment(s) are scanned for viruses or other defects. Edinburgh Napier University does not accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from this message or its attachment(s), or for errors or omissions arising after it was sent. Email is not a secure medium. Emails entering Edinburgh Napier University's system are subject to routine monitoring and filtering by Edinburgh Napier University.

Edinburgh Napier University is a registered Scottish charity. Registration number SC018373

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "evoAPPS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to evoapps+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to evo...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Giovanni Iacca, Ph.D.

Sim, Kevin

unread,
Jan 16, 2018, 4:04:19 AM1/16/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com

Hi Giovanni

Yes That's probably best. Springer are a bit fussy about the forms.

Regards

Kevin

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to evoapps+u...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to evo...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Anna Isabel Esparcia-Alcazar

unread,
Jan 16, 2018, 4:05:17 AM1/16/18
to Giovanni Iacca, EvoApps, pablo.gar...@uca.es
Yes please!

Check also that
- they have included 3 to 5 keywords in their paper
- the name of the folder is that of the first author (and not, e.g. p57)
- the authors.txt & abstract.txt are in place
- all the needed sources to recompile are in place (for submissions in .tex)

Best,
A*

From: evo...@googlegroups.com <evo...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Giovanni Iacca <giovann...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 8:54 AM
To: EvoApps
Cc: pablo.gar...@uca.es
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to evoapps+u...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to evo...@googlegroups.com.

Fabio D'Andreagiovanni

unread,
Jan 16, 2018, 4:10:50 AM1/16/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com, Giovanni Iacca, pablo.gar...@uca.es
Dear all,
in 2014, in the copyright form, the Chairs of EvoComNet suggested to me as author to simply put EvoStar - EvoApplications 2014 as name of the book.
Since then, for all the next EvoStar papers I have adopted the same title, just with the conference year updated and it seems that there were no issues on the Springer side.
Best,
Fabio

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "evoAPPS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to evoapps+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to evo...@googlegroups.com.

Anna Isabel Esparcia-Alcazar

unread,
Jan 16, 2018, 4:46:05 AM1/16/18
to Fabio D'Andreagiovanni, evo...@googlegroups.com, Giovanni Iacca, pablo.gar...@uca.es
Yes; in my experience, as long as there is a copyright form that vaguely looks what it should be, Springer poses no problems.
Unless they have changed recently, of course.
But if you're uneasy, better ask them to change it.


From: evo...@googlegroups.com <evo...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Fabio D'Andreagiovanni <f.dandre...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:10 AM
To: evo...@googlegroups.com
Cc: Giovanni Iacca; pablo.gar...@uca.es
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to evoapps+u...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to evo...@googlegroups.com.

Carlos Cotta

unread,
Jan 16, 2018, 4:58:33 AM1/16/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com

AFAIK, Springer has usually operated assuming bona fide from the authors, and hence have been flexible with the wording of the proceedings name and even with the editor list (et al. vs full list, etc.). I guess that as long as the info on the copyright form unambiguously identifies the conference there should be no problem. This said, I see no problem in asking for a corrected form to authors with other issues in their camera-ready packages. I only see it probably unnecessary if the camera-ready package is otherwise correct. Just my view.

On a separate issue, I also understand that some minor issues can be solved in our side and do not require author intervention, right? Just as an example, the authors of a certain paper have their authors.txt file named autors.txt. A misspelled folder name is another example. Each event could separately correct these minor issues, create a bundle with the corrected files and send it to the Proceedings Chair. It s probably faster and more reliable than asking the authors to do the same (and expecting them to comply in a reasonable time).

Cheers,

Carlos

El 16/1/18 a las 10:10, Fabio D'Andreagiovanni escribió:
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to evoapps+u...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to evo...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
*********************************************************************
* Prof. Carlos Cotta          Phone: +34 952137158                  *
* Dept. Lenguajes y CC.CC.    Fax:   +34 952131397                  *
* University of Malaga        Email: cco...@lcc.uma.es             *
* ETSI Informatica (3.2.49)   WWW:   http://www.lcc.uma.es/~ccottap *
* Campus de Teatinos, 29071 - Malaga - SPAIN                        *
********************************************************************* 

 

Paul Kaufmann

unread,
Jan 18, 2018, 4:19:08 AM1/18/18
to evo...@googlegroups.com, Sim, Kevin, Anna Isabel Esparcia-Alcazar
Dear Track Chairs,

may I ask you to please check the camera ready paper versions of your track and fill out for every paper, if the camera ready version is OK in the ’notes’ field: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QAdYjcAGDhaYc2YZWuj-hBUYbUURTBQix4a-GpaYZVk/edit?usp=sharing

If there is something NOT OK with the camera ready paper versions (google check list summaries the requirements), please contact the authors and ask them to make their contribution conform to the requirements: http://www.evostar.org/2018/submission_camera_ready.php

Cheap trick: If there are things I can correct faster than contacting the authors asking for resubmission, for instance: renaming the directory to <FirstAuthorLastName>, I do it by myself. For this, I check first whether I can log in as the author of the paper by going to Tab ‘Editor’->’Fetch Camera Ready Version’ -> click on the ‘infos’ link of the desired paper and finally clicking on the ‘More infos’ link on the first item of the log list (eg 2017-10-13 16:42:53 : “Abstract submission” sent to vuc...@fesb.hr (More infos…)). A new window pops up with the username of the paper (paper number) and the password. With this information I check if I can log in. Usually this works and I resubmit the fixed archive of the paper.

Without your help and filled out google check list I can’t go on with the preparation of the EvoAPPs proceedings.

Thank you very much and with best regards
Paul



> On 16. Jan 2018, at 10:58, Carlos Cotta <cco...@lcc.uma.es> wrote:
>
> AFAIK, Springer has usually operated assuming bona fide from the authors, and hence have been flexible with the wording of the proceedings name and even with the editor list (et al. vs full list, etc.). I guess that as long as the info on the copyright form unambiguously identifies the conference there should be no problem. This said, I see no problem in asking for a corrected form to authors with other issues in their camera-ready packages. I only see it probably unnecessary if the camera-ready package is otherwise correct. Just my view.
>
> On a separate issue, I also understand that some minor issues can be solved in our side and do not require author intervention, right? Just as an example, the authors of a certain paper have their authors.txt file named autors.txt. A misspelled folder name is another example. Each event could separately correct these minor issues, create a bundle with the corrected files and send it to the Proceedings Chair. It s probably faster and more reliable than asking the authors to do the same (and expecting them to comply in a reasonable time).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Carlos
> El 16/1/18 a las 10:10, Fabio D'Andreagiovanni escribió:
>> Dear all,
>> in 2014, in the copyright form, the Chairs of EvoComNet suggested to me as author to simply put EvoStar - EvoApplications 2014 as name of the book.
>> Since then, for all the next EvoStar papers I have adopted the same title, just with the conference year updated and it seems that there were no issues on the Springer side.
>> Best,
>> Fabio
>>
>> 2018-01-16 10:05 GMT+01:00 Anna Isabel Esparcia-Alcazar <aesp...@hotmail.com>:
>> Yes please!
>>
>> Check also that
>> - they have included 3 to 5 keywords in their paper
>> - the name of the folder is that of the first author (and not, e.g. p57)
>> - the authors.txt & abstract.txt are in place
>> - all the needed sources to recompile are in place (for submissions in .tex)
>>
>> Best,
>> A*
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages