Well, this group is abandoned, it seems --- did everybody give up?

[Joe]

There is New Evidence for God.

[Devils Advocaat]

Capitalising the words doesn't make them the truth.

[Joe]

whY noT?

[Devils Advocaat]

Duh! Because it doesn't.

[Joe]

Did u think i thot it did?

[Devils Advocaat]

All that aside, you haven't presented any evidence so far.

[Musycks]

evidence would be nice...

abandoned? maybe, very difficult to find a theist who can state a
coherant case. it's certainly eluded Joe and his ilk...

but I live in hope.

cheers, MR

[Verisoph]

Empirical evidence, please

On Feb 17, 7:38 am, Joe <jfg...@gmail.com> wrote:

[Pastor Jennifer v2]

Well you certainly succeeded in trashing any meaningful dialog on this
site with your theologically incoherent posturing. If I were looking
for evidence of God's existence I sure didn't find it ion your
advocacy.... rather the opposite.

On Feb 16, 8:38 pm, Joe <jfg...@gmail.com> wrote:

[Joe]

On Feb 20, 5:41 am, Musycks <midi...@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
> evidence would be nice...
>
> abandoned? maybe, very difficult to find a theist who can state a
> coherant case. it's certainly eluded Joe and his ilk...
>
> but I live in hope.
>

I am your Joseph of Hope.

> cheers, MR
>
> On Feb 17, 7:38 am, Joe <jfg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>

> > There is New Evidence for God.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[Joe]

On Feb 23, 2:59 am, Verisoph <giese...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Empirical evidence, please
>

Empirical means experienceable. Do you include your own interior
state in what you are calling emprical, or do you mean quantifiable?

There is no quanitifiable evidence for God. God as a quantity is ==
0.

However, there is Qualifiable evidence, which is spiritual in nature,
as God is Spirit.

> On Feb 17, 7:38 am, Joe <jfg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>

[Joe]

On Feb 23, 8:04 am, Pastor Jennifer v2

<jennifer.s.jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Well you certainly succeeded in trashing any meaningful dialog on this
> site with your theologically incoherent  posturing. If I were looking
> for evidence of God's existence I sure didn't find it ion your
> advocacy.... rather the opposite.
>

Please accept my apologies.

> On Feb 16, 8:38 pm, Joe <jfg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>

[Joe]

On Feb 20, 2:42 am, Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All that aside, you haven't presented any evidence so far.
>

You just haven't been paying enough attention. I already told you, I
AM.

> On Feb 19, 1:41 am, Joe <jfg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Did u think i thot it did?
>
> > On Feb 18, 1:33 am, Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Duh! Because it doesn't.
>
> > > On Feb 17, 8:32 pm, Joe <jfg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > whY noT?
>
> > > > On Feb 17, 11:50 am, Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Capitalising the words doesn't make them the truth.
>
> > > > > On Feb 16, 8:38 pm, Joe <jfg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>