What Threshold Threat of CO2 from Climate Change?
https://news.yahoo.com/solar-storm-strike-earth-direct-101857176.html “Solar storm about to strike Earth in a direct hit” Adam Smith Mon, July 18, 2022 at 5:18 AM Solar effects (sunspots, solar storms etc.) etc. will certainly affect the wind systems of the globe. That has nothing to do with CO2 quantities!! The pseudoscience of climatology (not meteorology) which is now an integral part of a worldwide pagan religion, contrary to the Augustinian ‘awakened’ consciousness. (https://www.midwestaugustinians.org/conversion-of-st-augustine, https://www.history.com/topics/british-history/great-awakening).
An estimated 1,050 wildfires worldwide produced global CO2 emissions of 76 billion tons in 2021. That is on the average ~ 3 forest fires each day, producing ~ 78 billion tons of CO2/day. The petroleum burning per year is 5.1/ 150 = ~ 1/30 = ~ 0.03 trillion tons of CO2 = 3 x 10^-2 x10^12 = ~ 30 billion tons of CO2/year. Which is a threat? What is the threshold of CO2 doom?
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/8349/cold-and-snow. The climatic snow line is about 15,000 ft above sea level at the equator and 19,000 ft in the Himalayas. It is progressively lower as the latitude increases, to just below 9,800 ft in the Alps. The reduced volume of melting of glaciers & icebergs (about 90% below the water surface) can only lower the sea level. The melting of mountain ice alone cannot dangerously raise the sea level; for those very powerful forces (not by CO2 !!) will be required to bring up the humongous subterranean water beds.
Destroy the petroleum industries, then even the battery industry will be destroyed because some of the 6000 byproducts of petroleum are indispensable for battery production also. Industries cannot keep an oil refinery open just for batteries! Automobile battery alone may then cost prohibitively high.
What Threshold Threat of CO2 from Climate Change?https://news.yahoo.com/solar-storm-strike-earth-direct-101857176.html “Solar storm about to strike Earth in a direct hit” Adam Smith Mon, July 18, 2022 at 5:18 AM Solar effects (sunspots, solar storms etc.) etc. will certainly affect the wind systems of the globe. That has nothing to do with CO2 quantities!! The pseudoscience of climatology (not meteorology) which is now an integral part of a worldwide pagan religion, contrary to the Augustinian ‘awakened’ consciousness. (https://www.midwestaugustinians.org/conversion-of-st-augustine, https://www.history.com/topics/british-history/great-awakening).
> Stalin (Marxism), Hitler (Socialism), Mussolini (Fascism), Mao etc. (all in effect are fascists) never dealt with climate change. They were all PAGANS
> You two (Crowell && Clark) may consider yourselves as some kind of wise guys.
> But frankly, it does not require much of brain power to find things
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 4:12:50 PM UTC-5 Tomasz Rola wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 04:20:51PM -0700, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
> Nobody said the solar storm had anything to do with climate change. As for
> the wild fires it is the case they are adding to the 55 billion tons of CO2
> entered into the atmosphere by fossil fuels.
> You follow what I notice of Christians. Jesus said to give up wealth to the
> poor. However, Christians most often align with the most wealthy and
> powerful. You are a religious shill for the oil companies. Remember that
> little bit in Matthew where Jesus said though you professed my name etc,
> when the kingdom comes I will not know you. It is the same with all
> Christian Churches, they all align with fascistic power. All but one
> Christian Church aligned with Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, which was the
> Jehovah's Witnesses. Most Christians are just dirty fascists, and if Jesus
> does exists (which I strongly doubt) he will probably say "I don't know
Perhaps you can explain how come Christians were going along with
Adolf when he sent them in droves (milions, literally) to
You are free to like and dislike religion, churches and believers, but
distorting description of reality to make it more like you would like
it to be, is going to fail.
Sure, there were religious leaders who opposed Nazism, such as the Lutheran theologian who wrote "First they came for ... ." I cannot remember his name off hand. There were others, but look at the preponderance. Consider in the United States the role of fundamentalists and evangelicals. They are almost lockstep with Don-the-Con t'Rump, who is America's "big pela-man" and cult leader, just as were Mussolini and Hitler. Religion is largely about do not ask questions, obey your leaders and pay what you owe your religious leaders (tithes etc) and masters. It is a perfect conditioning system for a compliant population under fascism.
** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. **
** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home **
** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... **
** Tomasz Rola mailto:tomas...@bigfoot.com **
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/80a39dcb-3d40-4570-a4aa-b3c59ad98f55n%40googlegroups.com.
> crimes are not being done to satiate religious feelings (except, perhaps, satanism) - "normal" human beings
do crimes to satiate their basic instincts
> The Christians are good. If millions followed Adolf, millions more fought to defeat him and his followers.
> White people enslaved Blacks, but white people also liberated them. [...] Hitler would never have gotten to do the mass murdering without working with the liberals friend, Joe Stalin.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2000393980.534803.1661120693205%40mail.yahoo.com.
> progressives, who in the US, are stalinists funded by billion$ in a trade of money (blah blah blah)
>> but it's very easy to find evidence that Osama bin Laden did
>> what he did for religious reasons, all you need to do is look at just about
>> anything he ever said or wrote in his life. Even George W. Bush said he
>> ordered the invasion of Iraq because an invisible man in the sky told him
>> to. I can't think of a reason I should disregard all that and not take what
> The people you mentioned are the leaders (religious, political). They
are not normal, not average.
> Bushie 43, like Adolf, Like Joey (free stuff!) knew how to throw a sales pitch. My question is, does anyone know or believe (evidence please) that Bush allowed Bin Laden to escape to Iran (blink-blink)?
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/269235081.629924.1661171892599%40mail.yahoo.com.
> Religion didn't do a damn thing really to improve the human condition, say in Europe. It did seem to as a practice stop formal human sacrifice,
> and eventually eliminate slavery and replaced it with serfdom,
> who is the rightful heir to Muhammad?