Consciousness in the Materialist, Computationalist and Leibniz models

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Roger Clough

unread,
Jun 16, 2013, 1:31:37 PM6/16/13
to - Roger Clough
Consciousness in the Materialist, Computationalist and Leibniz models 
This image of a man looking out a window represents the Subject/Object distinction.

The man represents the subject, which is subjective or inside. Outside of the window is the objective world. 
1) In the materialist model of consciousness there is no subject, because nothing is subjective-- everything is material or objective.

2) The computationalist or computer model of consciousness is essentially the same since everything is numbers, 
which are objects, being objective. So there is no subject and hence no consciousnress.

3) In the Leibniz model, the window is open so that both inside subject and outside object are subjective.
In this case we can have consciousness = subject + object,



Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 6/16/2013 
See my Leibniz site at
http://team.academia.edu/RogerClough
public domain 6_.jpg

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jun 17, 2013, 4:31:09 AM6/17/13
to everyth...@googlegroups.com
On 16 Jun 2013, at 19:31, Roger Clough wrote:

Consciousness in the Materialist, Computationalist and Leibniz models 
This image of a man looking out a window represents the Subject/Object distinction.

<public domain 6_.jpg>

The man represents the subject, which is subjective or inside. Outside of the window is the objective world. 
1) In the materialist model of consciousness there is no subject, because nothing is subjective-- everything is material or objective.

2) The computationalist or computer model of consciousness is essentially the same since everything is numbers, 
which are objects, being objective. So there is no subject and hence no consciousnress.


This is not correct. Everything is number, in the ontology, but we assume not just the numbers, but also addition and multiplication, and this is enough to get the dreams and the first person subjectivity, even formally in applying the oldest and best theory of knowledge (the one of Theaetetus).

You are confusing Bp and Bp & p. It is normal as they are equivalent, but with comp, the equivalence can be seen by God, and not by the finite terrestrial creature.

Bruno





3) In the Leibniz model, the window is open so that both inside subject and outside object are subjective.
In this case we can have consciousness = subject + object,



Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 6/16/2013 
See my Leibniz site at
http://team.academia.edu/RogerClough

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages