Hossenfelder on Superdeterminism

39 views
Skip to first unread message

Alan Grayson

unread,
Dec 15, 2020, 12:56:37 AM12/15/20
to Everything List

Alan Grayson

unread,
Dec 15, 2020, 1:15:51 AM12/15/20
to Everything List
Is the free will assumption she refers to, the belief that Bell experimenters are free to set the observing angles of their detectors? If that's the case, how would or could one delete this hypothesis in a Bell experiment?  AG

Alan Grayson

unread,
Dec 15, 2020, 1:32:33 AM12/15/20
to Everything List
If gravity isn't a force, why is there an ongoing effort to unity it with the other three known forces?  It seems like an impossible task, doomed to failure. AG

Lawrence Crowell

unread,
Dec 15, 2020, 5:34:09 AM12/15/20
to Everything List
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 at 12:32:33 AM UTC-6 agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
If gravity isn't a force, why is there an ongoing effort to unity it with the other three known forces?  It seems like an impossible task, doomed to failure. AG


Maybe the other gauge forces are not entirely forces as well.

LC

Alan Grayson

unread,
Dec 17, 2020, 4:09:57 AM12/17/20
to Everything List
Hossenfelder wants to delete the free will hypothesis from Bell experiments. Assuming one could do that, although I don't see how that could be done, but assuming it can be deleted, would that change the probabilities measured by Bell experiments? AG

Alan Grayson

unread,
Dec 17, 2020, 4:29:11 AM12/17/20
to Everything List
She might mean to assume the detector settings were set when the universe began, and not determined by the experimenters. But why would that solve the enigma of non-locality? AG

Alan Grayson

unread,
Dec 17, 2020, 4:32:46 AM12/17/20
to Everything List
Or is her idea tantamount to the claim that the universe is NOT irreducibly random, and there exists a sort-of non local hidden variable that implies a deterministic interpretation of QM? AG
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages