Skeptics of gun control sometimes point to a 2016 study. From
2000 and 2014, it found, the United States death rate by mass
shooting was 1.5 per one million people. The rate was 1.7 in
Switzerland and 3.4 in Finland, suggesting American mass shootings
were not actually so common.
But the same study found that the United States had 133 mass
shootings. Finland had only two, which killed 18 people, and
Switzerland had one, which killed 14. In short, isolated
incidents. So while mass shootings can happen anywhere, they are
only a matter of routine in the United States.
If I understand that correctly, mass shootings in the US are
"routine" because it's much bigger than Switzerland and Finland
(total 14 million) so they're counting over a much bigger nation
(335 million). So the skeptics have a point. I also wonder why the
comparison is just to Switzerland and Finland...cherry picking?
There also seems to be quite a bit of variation in how mass
shootings are counted.
Average (Mean) Annual Death Rate per Million People from Mass
Public Shootings (U.S., Canada, and Europe, 2009-2015):
Norway — 1.888
Serbia — 0.381
France — 0.347
Macedonia — 0.337
Albania — 0.206
Slovakia — 0.185
Switzerland — 0.142
Finland — 0.132
Belgium — 0.128
Czech Republic — 0.123
United States — 0.089
Austria — 0.068
Netherlands — 0.051
Canada — 0.032
England — 0.027
Germany — 0.023
Russia — 0.012
Italy — 0.009
In addition, a 2018 CRPC study ranked the U.S. at number
sixty-four in the world in terms of mass shooting rates per
capita.
However, read the analysis at
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/mass-shootings-by-country
which critiques the above and suggests a different statistic
Typical (Median) Annual Death Rate per Million People from Mass
Public Shootings (U.S., Canada, and Europe, 2009-2015):
United States — 0.058
Albania — 0
Austria — 0
Belgium — 0
Czech Republic — 0
Finland — 0
France — 0
Germany — 0
Italy — 0
Macedonia — 0
Netherlands — 0
Norway — 0
Russia — 0
Serbia — 0
Slovakia — 0
Switzerland — 0
United Kingdom — 0
That 0 as a median is a little confusing. It just means that
for more than half the years the number was zero
. It would
make more sense to score the mean-time-between-mass-shootings as the
statistic or it's inverse the rate of mass shootings.
Brent