On Jul 4, 3:13 am, INK <
i...@pinballseye.se> wrote:
> Yes, of course there should be a big tournament next to the IFPA (like I
> did the Pre-IFPA in 2011), but it don't have to (and shouldn't) be the EPC
> - it could be any tournament.
Allow me to disagree with you here. I think having the EPC the week
before IFPA will only help draw better players to both events. The
only data point we have in the US/Canada is looking at how many
players traveled across the pond to London for IFPA6, versus how many
traveled across the pond to Sweden for IFPA8.
19 players traveled to play in IFPA6, with a majority of those players
competing in the EPC a week before.
4 players traveled to play in IFPA8 (myself, Zach, Trent, Cayle), and
all 4 of us were very excited about competing at BPP.
My goal with the EPC would be to do whatever things possible to
motivate the best players in the world to show up, and clearly having
IFPA the week after has shown to do that (with the extremely limited
data available).
> > The reason I don't think non-Europeans should be allowed in the EPC is
> simply that the tournament is designed (or should be) to find the best
> European player and that could be ruined when some of the participants are
> from other countries.
>
> For example, Jorian have qualified as #1 in the EPC 2013, wins his first
> playoff round, but hey, then he goes up agains Bowen - and looses - he's
> out of the tournament at below 9th place! In the following match, Bowen has
> a very bad day and looses against you (!) - OMO is in the finals! But what
> if you had met JOE instead? I don't say he had won - but now he didn't even
> had the chance. My point in this example is that Jorian may be the best
> European player but if he is eliminated by an American all that is turned
> upside down.
>
> Did you see any South American teams in the European Football Championships
> last week? I don't think so. Keep the EPC the EPC.
I couldn't possibly disagree with you more on this. You can give
sporting examples where on European teams compete, and I can give
examples where they don't (British Open in golf, which is the
equivalent of the "EPC of professional golf", is often won by people
outside of Europe. The US Open in golf, the same thing, many players
are crowned the "US Champion" from outside of the country.
The biggest example of why pinball should allow all competitors to
participate in the EPC, is that the event has precedence of being run
that way.
If you want to deem the best European PLAYER, then have a separate
final with the 4 best European finalists. To crown the European
Pinball Champion IMO, is simply finding the best player that performed
at the tournament, period.
> And there are WPPR-tournaments with closed entries so that won't be a
> problem. A good example would be the Swedish Nationals - which is open for
> swedish citizens only - according to the example above.
The reason for the inclusion of the closed Swedish Championships is
because of the historic tradition of that tournament, which has
existed far longer than WPPR points ever existed. To preserve the
prestige of what that event stands for, we allow a country to have one
'closed' tournament per year limited to only countrymen.
Had the EPC always been setup to only allow Europeans over the past 20
years, I would happen to agree with you and say that the tradition of
the event dictates that no US/Japan/Australia/etc. players can
participate. The simple fact is that the EPC was never designed this
way.
To make myself perfectly clear, if the EPC now became a European only
event, it would forfeit the right to award any WPPR points at all IMO
(and not really IMO since I'm the dictator and make the rules) :-)
Assuming WPPR points are something that's important to the competitive
pinball playing community in Europe, hopefully this doesn't lead to
the removal of any future EPC's if this were to happen.
> Ps. When I arranged the Danish Open Nationals 2010 - I explained this
> problem for them and solved it, not by letting the best Dane out of the
> tournament be the Danish Champion (that would obviously be wrong), but by
> letting the four best Danes out of the Qualifications play for the title
> Danish Pinball Champion 2010 alongside (or after) the ordinary play. Ds.
Couldn't agree more. This is a great way of being able to serve both
purposes, crowning an overall champion of the tournament, and crowning
the "Danish" Champion amongst a group of Danish players. There are
tournaments in the US that do something similar for state champions.
Josh