Mark Carroll <
mt...@ixod.org> wrote:
>On 05 Feb 2024, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>Mark Carroll <
mt...@ixod.org> wrote:
>>>On 05 Feb 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
>>>>Am 03/02/2024 um 19:45 schrieb Bobbie Sellers:
>>>>>If you listen to or watch sane TV like PBS ABC, NBC or CBS you might
>>>>>have heard that Covid-19
>>>>Thank God we have none of your Ameritard TV channels in Europe.
>>>We get PBS over the air for free in Britain.
>>Uh what? Nobody gets one country's broadcast network in another country.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBS_America has a decent summary - "a
>profit-making enterprise managed separately from the main non-profit,
>publicly financed arm".
I didn't know that existed. The programming model is unique. I have no
idea if any other country has it. PBS, as a network, owns no
programming. All programming is produced (or in the case of foreign
programming purchased) by a member public broadcasting station.
PBS NewsHour, for instance, is produced by WETA-TV Washington. British
dramas, police procedurals, and mysteries, often from ITV, are either
joint productions or purchased as foreign programming by WGBH Boston.
Member stations raise monies locally to pay fees to acquire programs to
broadcast. The fees are based on population in the broadcast area. Some
markets have more than one public television station and there must be a
lower fee paid because they tend to get prime time programming months
behind the main station.
I guess PBS_America sells foreign rights on behalf of member stations. I
assume it's voluntarily, that the owning station might try to sell
rights directly if it were cost effective.
>You raise an interesting question of how the funding works for the one
>here.
https://tvadvertising.co.uk/channel/pbs-america/ explains. "It is
>provided by cable and satellite operators as part of their channel
>packages and carries advertising. Unlike PBS in the United States it
>does not solicit donations from viewers."
That makes sense. But the reverse is NOT true: Monies are raised locally
in America to buy foreign programming.
>(snip)
>>PBS used to take a lot of BBC programming but that hasn't been true
>>in decades. These days it's quite the exception if any BBC programming
>>is broadcast over PBS.
>That makes sense: since BBC America launched, I suppose they're more
>keen to keep the US market to themselves instead of selling the shows to
>other channels.
BBC America has as little to do with BBC programming as possible. It's a
satellite channel with cable distribution (and an associated streaming
service purchased separately )owned by AMC networks in partnership with
BBC Studios, but it's BBC Worldwide that sells foreign programming rights.
BBC America has to bid on rights like any other channel. They weren't
the original place to watch Doctor Who, then bought the rights, then
lost them to Disney.
Most of its programming is movies from American studios. We don't even
get British movies. They don't even star British actors!
They've had original series but their most famous series Orphan Black
was a Canadian-American joint production that BBC had nothing to do
with!