Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
I'm a newbie testing HTML²
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Ray Banana
Oct 22, 2023, 10:41:33 AM10/22/23
to
Haha.
candycanearter07
Oct 22, 2023, 11:18:05 AM10/22/23
to
On 10/22/23 09:39, Ray Banana wrote:
> Haha.
>
HTML squared? But 1^2 is just one..
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
> Haha.
>
HTML squared? But 1^2 is just one..
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Juan
Oct 29, 2023, 2:19:18 PM10/29/23
to
Other testing..
"Ray Banana" <ray...@raybanana.net> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
news:uh3c9k$1so47$9...@raybanana.eternal-september.org...
> Haha.
>
"Ray Banana" <ray...@raybanana.net> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
news:uh3c9k$1so47$9...@raybanana.eternal-september.org...
> Haha.
>
meagain
Nov 8, 2023, 10:28:51 PM11/8/23
to
-------- Original Message --------
> On 10/22/23 09:39, Ray Banana wrote:
>> Haha.
>>
>
> HTML squared? But 1^2 is just one..
0^0 is 1 too --- i think
> On 10/22/23 09:39, Ray Banana wrote:
>> Haha.
>>
>
> HTML squared? But 1^2 is just one..
--
.
candycanearter07
Nov 8, 2023, 10:28:52 PM11/8/23
to
Daniel65
Nov 9, 2023, 3:28:55 AM11/9/23
to
meagain wrote on 9/11/23 7:17 am:
0^0 is the same as 0 multiplied by 0 and anything multiplied by 0 is 0!!
--
Daniel
--
Daniel
Dan Purgert
Nov 9, 2023, 4:20:06 AM11/9/23
to
entirely remember "why" that is ... probably falls into one of those
other advanced sets of mathematics that build upon calculus.
Kinda like how one can divide by zero, but it's easier to just say you
can't do it in the "standard subset of mathematics that everyone
learns", because it's an absolute mess.
--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860
yeti
Nov 9, 2023, 6:34:51 AM11/9/23
to
| Zero to the power of zero, denoted by 0^0, is a mathematical
| expression that is either defined as 1 or left undefined, depending on
| context. In algebra and combinatorics, one typically defines 0^0 =
| 1. In mathematical analysis, the expression is sometimes left
| undefined. Computer programming languages and software also have
| differing ways of handling this expression.
(Transliterated "⁰" to "^0" to make more news readers happy.)
So better ask questions about the context and for ways around hitting
that 0^0 case to be found.
--
|rom The Future. +++ Breaking News From The Future. +++ Breaking News F|
| The USoA are switching to the binary number system because |
| having more than 1+1 distinct digits is far too woke. |
|+ #MABA + #makeAmericaBinaryAgain + #USA + #USoA + #woke + #MABA + #ma|
yeti
Nov 9, 2023, 6:35:42 AM11/9/23
to
Daniel65
Nov 9, 2023, 7:24:10 AM11/9/23
to
Dan Purgert wrote on 9/11/23 8:20 pm:
> post, I was going for '0^0 = 1' but, before
I posted, I checked with my sister (much more of a mathematician than
yours truly!) and she reminded me that 'Anything multiplied by 0 equals
0', so not wanting to start a Family Feud ....!! ;-)
But, then again, in another thread, we were discussing 'The Rules of the
English Language'-type of thing and I mentioned "'I' before 'E' unless
after 'C' .... except for the 1,000-plus exemptions to that rule!!" ....
so, maybe, 0^0 = 1 might be the exemption to this rule!! ;-P
--
Daniel
> On 2023-11-09, Daniel65 wrote:
>> meagain wrote on 9/11/23 7:17 am:
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> On 10/22/23 09:39, Ray Banana wrote:
>>>>> Haha.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HTML squared? But 1^2 is just one..
>>>
>>> 0^0 is 1 too --- i think
>>>
>> 0^0 is the same as 0 multiplied by 0 and anything multiplied by 0
>> is 0!!
>
> Exponents are fun, such that n^0 = 1; inclusive of n=0. I can't
> entirely remember "why" that is ... probably falls into one of those
> other advanced sets of mathematics that build upon calculus.
>
> Kinda like how one can divide by zero, but it's easier to just say
> you can't do it in the "standard subset of mathematics that everyone
> learns", because it's an absolute mess. When I first read meagain's
>> meagain wrote on 9/11/23 7:17 am:
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> On 10/22/23 09:39, Ray Banana wrote:
>>>>> Haha.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HTML squared? But 1^2 is just one..
>>>
>>> 0^0 is 1 too --- i think
>>>
>> 0^0 is the same as 0 multiplied by 0 and anything multiplied by 0
>> is 0!!
>
> Exponents are fun, such that n^0 = 1; inclusive of n=0. I can't
> entirely remember "why" that is ... probably falls into one of those
> other advanced sets of mathematics that build upon calculus.
>
> Kinda like how one can divide by zero, but it's easier to just say
> you can't do it in the "standard subset of mathematics that everyone
> post, I was going for '0^0 = 1' but, before
I posted, I checked with my sister (much more of a mathematician than
yours truly!) and she reminded me that 'Anything multiplied by 0 equals
0', so not wanting to start a Family Feud ....!! ;-)
But, then again, in another thread, we were discussing 'The Rules of the
English Language'-type of thing and I mentioned "'I' before 'E' unless
after 'C' .... except for the 1,000-plus exemptions to that rule!!" ....
so, maybe, 0^0 = 1 might be the exemption to this rule!! ;-P
--
Daniel
Dan Purgert
Nov 9, 2023, 8:29:58 AM11/9/23
to
On 2023-11-09, Daniel65 wrote:
> Dan Purgert wrote on 9/11/23 8:20 pm:
>> On 2023-11-09, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> meagain wrote on 9/11/23 7:17 am:
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> On 10/22/23 09:39, Ray Banana wrote:
>>>>>> Haha.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> HTML squared? But 1^2 is just one..
>>>>
>>>> 0^0 is 1 too --- i think
>>>>
>>> 0^0 is the same as 0 multiplied by 0 and anything multiplied by 0
>>> is 0!!
>>
>> Exponents are fun, such that n^0 = 1; inclusive of n=0. I can't
>> entirely remember "why" that is ... probably falls into one of those
>> other advanced sets of mathematics that build upon calculus.
>>
>> Kinda like how one can divide by zero, but it's easier to just say
>> you can't do it in the "standard subset of mathematics that everyone
>> learns", because it's an absolute mess. When I first read meagain's
>> post, I was going for '0^0 = 1' but, before
>
> I posted, I checked with my sister (much more of a mathematician than
> yours truly!) and she reminded me that 'Anything multiplied by 0 equals
> 0', so not wanting to start a Family Feud ....!! ;-)
Which is true, depending on which "parts" of math we're talking about
> Dan Purgert wrote on 9/11/23 8:20 pm:
>> On 2023-11-09, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> meagain wrote on 9/11/23 7:17 am:
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> On 10/22/23 09:39, Ray Banana wrote:
>>>>>> Haha.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> HTML squared? But 1^2 is just one..
>>>>
>>>> 0^0 is 1 too --- i think
>>>>
>>> 0^0 is the same as 0 multiplied by 0 and anything multiplied by 0
>>> is 0!!
>>
>> Exponents are fun, such that n^0 = 1; inclusive of n=0. I can't
>> entirely remember "why" that is ... probably falls into one of those
>> other advanced sets of mathematics that build upon calculus.
>>
>> Kinda like how one can divide by zero, but it's easier to just say
>> you can't do it in the "standard subset of mathematics that everyone
>> learns", because it's an absolute mess. When I first read meagain's
>> post, I was going for '0^0 = 1' but, before
>
> I posted, I checked with my sister (much more of a mathematician than
> yours truly!) and she reminded me that 'Anything multiplied by 0 equals
> 0', so not wanting to start a Family Feud ....!! ;-)
(again, like how "Can't divide by zero").
What I understood from the explanation was "x^0 is always one,
because the empty-set matches the empty-set ({} == {} is true).
Likewise, 0^1 = 0, because the empty-set does not match anything other
than the empty-set ({} == {1} is false)".
yeti
Nov 9, 2023, 1:54:25 PM11/9/23
to
Blue-Maned_Hawk
Nov 9, 2023, 4:44:49 PM11/9/23
to
yeti wrote:
> (Transliterated "⁰" to "^0" to make more news readers happy.)
Any newsreader that can't handle Unicode is obsolete.
> (Transliterated "⁰" to "^0" to make more news readers happy.)
--
Sn!pe
Nov 9, 2023, 5:16:05 PM11/9/23
to
Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> yeti wrote:
>
> > (Transliterated "?" to "^0" to make more news readers happy.)
That isn't a problem here; if my 'reader can't render it, I don't
need to read it. It can be fun guessing what it is, though.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator.
My pet rock Gordon just is.
Google Groups articles not seen unless poster is whitelisted.
> yeti wrote:
>
> > (Transliterated "?" to "^0" to make more news readers happy.)
>
> Any newsreader that can't handle Unicode is obsolete.
s/obsolete/obsolescent
> Any newsreader that can't handle Unicode is obsolete.
That isn't a problem here; if my 'reader can't render it, I don't
need to read it. It can be fun guessing what it is, though.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator.
My pet rock Gordon just is.
Google Groups articles not seen unless poster is whitelisted.
candycanearter07
Nov 9, 2023, 5:23:03 PM11/9/23
to
On 11/9/23 16:16, Sn!pe wrote:
> Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> yeti wrote:
>>
>>> (Transliterated "?" to "^0" to make more news readers happy.)
>>
>> Any newsreader that can't handle Unicode is obsolete.
>
> s/obsolete/obsolescent
>
> That isn't a problem here; if my 'reader can't render it, I don't
> need to read it. It can be fun guessing what it is, though.
>
I prefer basic ASCII, but to each their own.
> Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> yeti wrote:
>>
>>> (Transliterated "?" to "^0" to make more news readers happy.)
>>
>> Any newsreader that can't handle Unicode is obsolete.
>
> s/obsolete/obsolescent
>
> That isn't a problem here; if my 'reader can't render it, I don't
> need to read it. It can be fun guessing what it is, though.
>
Anton Ertl
Nov 10, 2023, 2:37:06 AM11/10/23
to
Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> writes:
>Any newsreader that can't handle Unicode is obsolete.
If you ask all those people who have departed Usenet, or that have not
>Any newsreader that can't handle Unicode is obsolete.
even started using it, or use it through a web browser, any newsreader
that can handle Unicode is obsolete as well. Meanwhile, those of us
who are still using Usenet proper like our newsreaders, and your or
their opinion about them won't change that.
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl Some things have to be seen to be believed
an...@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at Most things have to be believed to be seen
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
Daniel65
Nov 10, 2023, 2:58:32 AM11/10/23
to
Dan Purgert wrote on 10/11/23 12:29 am:
Whoooosh!!
Sets?? Sets? What's these 'Set' things of which you speak!! ;-P
--
Daniel
Sets?? Sets? What's these 'Set' things of which you speak!! ;-P
--
Daniel
yeti
Nov 10, 2023, 8:06:24 AM11/10/23
to
code every keystroke matters. Not making these small changes for old
readers may make me redo/reexplain it later and that'd be much more
action.
And you cannot demand me not to be lazy!
0 new messages