Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
New to ES
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Simon
Dec 26, 2023, 3:27:36 AM12/26/23
to
Hello,
I moved to Usenet after fidonet and have had a long break, great to
see some live groups and hoping to stay for a while this time :-)
--
Simon
RLU: 222126
I moved to Usenet after fidonet and have had a long break, great to
see some live groups and hoping to stay for a while this time :-)
--
Simon
RLU: 222126
Marco Moock
Dec 26, 2023, 6:52:21 AM12/26/23
to
Am 26.12.2023 um 08:27:33 Uhr schrieb Simon:
> I moved to Usenet after fidonet and have had a long break, great to
> see some live groups and hoping to stay for a while this time :-)
Welcome!
> I moved to Usenet after fidonet and have had a long break, great to
> see some live groups and hoping to stay for a while this time :-)
Retro Guy
Dec 26, 2023, 6:54:32 AM12/26/23
to
cr0c0d1le
Dec 26, 2023, 7:06:33 PM12/26/23
to
Simon <Sim...@invalid.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I moved to Usenet after fidonet and have had a long break, great to
> see some live groups and hoping to stay for a while this time :-)
Welcome!
> Hello,
>
> I moved to Usenet after fidonet and have had a long break, great to
> see some live groups and hoping to stay for a while this time :-)
Simon
Dec 27, 2023, 1:36:11 AM12/27/23
to
ES :-)
--
Simon
RLU: 222126
ArchiPit
Dec 27, 2023, 10:22:15 AM12/27/23
to
Rispondo qui sotto a Simon
> I confess living in Spain now it is odd to see the ng abbreviated to
> ES :-)
There is also Solani
> I confess living in Spain now it is odd to see the ng abbreviated to
> ES :-)
Simon
Dec 28, 2023, 4:37:36 AM12/28/23
to
--
Simon
RLU: 222126
m...@myprovider.invalid
Feb 10, 2024, 3:21:45 AM2/10/24
to
Am 26.12.23 um 12:52 schrieb Marco Moock:
> Welcome!
Thank you, this is a test. I hope you don't bother
Cheers, Chat
> Welcome!
Thank you, this is a test. I hope you don't bother
Cheers, Chat
Me
Feb 10, 2024, 3:40:11 AM2/10/24
to
Am 27.12.23 um 16:22 schrieb ArchiPit:
> There is also Solani
Yeah but which one is better?
> There is also Solani
Yeah but which one is better?
yeti
Feb 10, 2024, 9:05:14 AM2/10/24
to
But: Why XOR, when you can have AND?
--
I do not bite, I just want to play.
Sn!pe
Feb 10, 2024, 9:55:38 AM2/10/24
to
yeti <ye...@tilde.institute> wrote:
> Me <m...@myprovider.invalid> writes:
>
> > Am 27.12.23 um 16:22 schrieb ArchiPit:
> >> There is also Solani
> > Yeah but which one is better?
>
> Good question.
>
> But: Why XOR, when you can have AND?
Indeed. To answer the question: IMO Solani is good but a little
> Me <m...@myprovider.invalid> writes:
>
> > Am 27.12.23 um 16:22 schrieb ArchiPit:
> >> There is also Solani
> > Yeah but which one is better?
>
> Good question.
>
> But: Why XOR, when you can have AND?
more restrictive in its Ts & Cs. E-S is not quite as fast as Solani but
it's still good and has a very tolerant adminstrator. [hat-tip to Ray]
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator
My pet rock Gordon says:
The first duty of government is defence of the realm.
Adam H. Kerman
Feb 10, 2024, 12:55:13 PM2/10/24
to
Sn!pe <snip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>yeti <ye...@tilde.institute> wrote:
>>Me <m...@myprovider.invalid> writes:
>>>Am 27.12.23 um 16:22 schrieb ArchiPit:
>>>>There is also Solani
>>>Yeah but which one is better?
>>Good question.
>>But: Why XOR, when you can have AND?
>Indeed. To answer the question: IMO Solani is good but a little
>more restrictive in its Ts & Cs. E-S is not quite as fast as Solani but
>it's still good and has a very tolerant adminstrator. [hat-tip to Ray]
Ray was INTOLERANT of massive spam originating at Google Groups and did
>yeti <ye...@tilde.institute> wrote:
>>Me <m...@myprovider.invalid> writes:
>>>Am 27.12.23 um 16:22 schrieb ArchiPit:
>>>>There is also Solani
>>>Yeah but which one is better?
>>Good question.
>>But: Why XOR, when you can have AND?
>Indeed. To answer the question: IMO Solani is good but a little
>more restrictive in its Ts & Cs. E-S is not quite as fast as Solani but
>it's still good and has a very tolerant adminstrator. [hat-tip to Ray]
something about it, inspiring a few others to issue NoCeMs to counter
abuse as well.
I'm not sure Usenet users truly understand how important the counter
measures to the abuse originating at Google have been. We were going to
lose a whole lot of regulars due to it.
For once, knowledge that the abuse was occurring somehow made its
way into the Real World (tm). Even Google noticed that the abuse had
harmed its reputation among non-Usenet users. Of course, we were all
shocked that, rather than fixing what made Google Groups so attractive
to originating abuse, Google instead chose to blame Usenet itself.
Also, Ray's seamus jokes are hysterical.
Blue-Maned_Hawk
Feb 13, 2024, 2:32:55 AM2/13/24
to
Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> Sn!pe <snip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> E-S is not quite as fast as Solani but it's
>>still good and has a very tolerant adminstrator. [hat-tip to Ray]
>
> Ray was INTOLERANT of massive spam originating at Google Groups and did
> something about it, inspiring a few others to issue NoCeMs to counter
> abuse as well.
If one defines tolerance according to the paradox of tolerance, where
those who are tolerant cannot tolerate those who are intolerant, i'm sure
there's some way for things to be bullshat into meaning that you're both
right.
--
Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to
Hawk│/
blu.mɛin.dʰak/
│he/him/his/himself/Mr.
blue-maned_hawk.srht.site
“Ah, _compromise_: a way to leave everyone unhappy!” — “Brexit, briefly”
> Sn!pe <snip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> E-S is not quite as fast as Solani but it's
>>still good and has a very tolerant adminstrator. [hat-tip to Ray]
>
> Ray was INTOLERANT of massive spam originating at Google Groups and did
> something about it, inspiring a few others to issue NoCeMs to counter
> abuse as well.
those who are tolerant cannot tolerate those who are intolerant, i'm sure
there's some way for things to be bullshat into meaning that you're both
right.
--
Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to
Hawk│/
blu.mɛin.dʰak/
│he/him/his/himself/Mr.
blue-maned_hawk.srht.site
“Ah, _compromise_: a way to leave everyone unhappy!” — “Brexit, briefly”
Adam H. Kerman
Feb 13, 2024, 3:17:03 AM2/13/24
to
Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>If one defines tolerance according to the paradox of tolerance, where
>those who are tolerant cannot tolerate those who are intolerant, i'm sure
>there's some way for things to be bullshat into meaning that you're both
>right.
Why don't you redefine bullshat into a snack food and gorge yourself?
>If one defines tolerance according to the paradox of tolerance, where
>those who are tolerant cannot tolerate those who are intolerant, i'm sure
>there's some way for things to be bullshat into meaning that you're both
>right.
Blue-Maned_Hawk
Feb 14, 2024, 9:19:40 AM2/14/24
to
--
Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to
Hawk│/
blu.mɛin.dʰak/
│he/him/his/himself/Mr.
blue-maned_hawk.srht.site
Adam H. Kerman
Feb 14, 2024, 12:48:11 PM2/14/24
to
Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>If one defines tolerance according to the paradox of tolerance, where
>>>those who are tolerant cannot tolerate those who are intolerant, i'm
>>>sure there's some way for things to be bullshat into meaning that you're
>>>both right.
>>Why don't you redefine bullshat into a snack food and gorge yourself?
>Well, that's uncalledfor.
You called for it when you re-defined the word "tolerance" into idiocy
>Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>If one defines tolerance according to the paradox of tolerance, where
>>>those who are tolerant cannot tolerate those who are intolerant, i'm
>>>sure there's some way for things to be bullshat into meaning that you're
>>>both right.
>>Why don't you redefine bullshat into a snack food and gorge yourself?
>Well, that's uncalledfor.
you made up. You also changed the topic of discussion to "bullshat". I
discussed what you wanted to discuss.
Blue-Maned_Hawk
Feb 14, 2024, 4:28:31 PM2/14/24
to
up with. At no part of my message did i focus on the word ‘bullshat’—only
ever did i discuss the matter of tolerance.
--
Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to
Hawk│/
blu.mɛin.dʰak/
│he/him/his/himself/Mr.
blue-maned_hawk.srht.site
Adam H. Kerman
Feb 14, 2024, 5:08:14 PM2/14/24
to
Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>If one defines tolerance according to the paradox of tolerance, where
>>>>>those who are tolerant cannot tolerate those who are intolerant, i'm
>>>>>sure there's some way for things to be bullshat into meaning that
>>>>>you're both right.
>>>>Why don't you redefine bullshat into a snack food and gorge yourself?
>>>Well, that's uncalledfor.
>>You called for it when you re-defined the word "tolerance" into idiocy
>>you made up. You also changed the topic of discussion to "bullshat". I
>>discussed what you wanted to discuss.
>The paradox of tolerance is widely attested to; it is not something i came
>up with. At no part of my message did i focus on the word 'bullshat'-only
>Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>If one defines tolerance according to the paradox of tolerance, where
>>>>>those who are tolerant cannot tolerate those who are intolerant, i'm
>>>>>sure there's some way for things to be bullshat into meaning that
>>>>>you're both right.
>>>>Why don't you redefine bullshat into a snack food and gorge yourself?
>>>Well, that's uncalledfor.
>>You called for it when you re-defined the word "tolerance" into idiocy
>>you made up. You also changed the topic of discussion to "bullshat". I
>>discussed what you wanted to discuss.
>The paradox of tolerance is widely attested to; it is not something i came
>ever did i discuss the matter of tolerance.
Provide so-stated widespread attestations or admit your position is
"bullshat".
You fill your article with non-ASCII characters that don't belong in
plain text communication. Your .sigfile is an unreadable mess of
non-text symbols. You are a sockpuppet. What exactly about you isn't
"bullshat"?
Don't answer. I'm spitting out the hook in this thread.
Blue-Maned_Hawk
Feb 15, 2024, 5:08:23 PM2/15/24
to
Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>The paradox of tolerance is widely attested to; it is not something i
>>came up with. At no part of my message did i focus on the word
>>'bullshat'-only ever did i discuss the matter of tolerance.
>
> Provide so-stated widespread attestations or admit your position is
> "bullshat".
Well, here's an example: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>The paradox of tolerance is widely attested to; it is not something i
>>came up with. At no part of my message did i focus on the word
>>'bullshat'-only ever did i discuss the matter of tolerance.
>
> Provide so-stated widespread attestations or admit your position is
> "bullshat".
Paradox_of_tolerance>. The article is well-cited, and its history page at
<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Paradox_of_tolerance&action=history> shows that it is not new.
> You fill your article with non-ASCII characters that don't belong in
> plain text communication. Your .sigfile is an unreadable mess of
> non-text symbols. You are a sockpuppet. What exactly about you isn't
> "bullshat"?
i.
--
Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to
Hawk│/
blu.mɛin.dʰak/
│he/him/his/himself/Mr.
blue-maned_hawk.srht.site
0 new messages