Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
testing
1 view
Skip to first unread message
not me
Dec 15, 2012, 10:13:14 PM12/15/12
to
This is a test.
Barry Margolin
Dec 15, 2012, 10:19:36 PM12/15/12
to
In article <kaje7t$ajr$1...@anonymous.dont-email.me>,
not me <spam....@no.mail.org> wrote:
> This is a test.
Why do so many people think e-s.config is a test group, when there's a
group named eternal-september.test, not to mention the standard alt.test?
--
Barry Margolin
Arlington, MA
not me <spam....@no.mail.org> wrote:
> This is a test.
Why do so many people think e-s.config is a test group, when there's a
group named eternal-september.test, not to mention the standard alt.test?
--
Barry Margolin
Arlington, MA
Bit Twister
Dec 16, 2012, 12:10:45 AM12/16/12
to
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:19:36 -0500, Barry Margolin wrote:
> Why do so many people think e-s.config is a test group, when there's a
> group named eternal-september.test, not to mention the standard alt.test?
Yes, kinda confuses me also.
> Why do so many people think e-s.config is a test group, when there's a
> group named eternal-september.test, not to mention the standard alt.test?
Ray may want to consider adding a brief message to use the test group
in the email containing the id/pwd. :)
f
Jul 24, 2023, 6:37:56 AM7/24/23
to
Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article <kaje7t$ajr$1...@anonymous.dont-email.me>,
> not me <spam....@no.mail.org> wrote:
>
> > This is a test.
>
> Why do so many people think e-s.config is a test group, when there's
> a group named eternal-september.test, not to mention the standard
> alt.test?
test
> In article <kaje7t$ajr$1...@anonymous.dont-email.me>,
> not me <spam....@no.mail.org> wrote:
>
> > This is a test.
>
> Why do so many people think e-s.config is a test group, when there's
> a group named eternal-september.test, not to mention the standard
> alt.test?
0 new messages