Q re permutation t-test & interpretation of data when estimation stats and significance testing don't agree
45 views
Skip to first unread message
Yajing Xu
unread,
Dec 22, 2020, 12:18:40 PM12/22/20
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to estimationstats
Hi everyone!
I'm fairly new to estimation stats and have a few questions regarding the web app as well as interpretation of data.
As I understand it, the permutation t-test offered on the website has itself nothing to do with the estimation stats, and is just a separate t-test, is that right? I.e. if my data is ordinal or does not have equal variance, can I use MannWhitney U or the Welch's t-test instead of the permutation t-test in addition to the estimation stats?
In one of my two-sample test, zero lied outside the 95% CI of estimation stats, but the p-value for the t-test (Mann Whitney) was 0.054, and non-significant. Now I know that significance thinking should be abandoned, but how would you best interpret/phrase the result for a journal? (Or in general when estimation stats and significance testing don't agree on the outcome...)
Many thanks for your help!
Best,
Yajing
Adam Claridge-Chang
unread,
Jan 6, 2021, 2:17:19 AM1/6/21
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to estimationstats
Hi Yajing,
As I understand it, the permutation t-test offered
on the website has itself nothing to do with the estimation stats, and
is just a separate t-test, is that right? I.e. if my data is ordinal or
does not have equal variance, can I use MannWhitney U or the Welch's
t-test instead of the permutation t-test in addition to the estimation
stats?
Yes, we chose permutation p-values that simply because it uses resampling like the bootstrap, and is fairly robust for non-normality. We strongly discourage significance testing (choosing alpha and reporting 'significance') and believe p-values of any kind should not be used to interpret data.
In one of my two-sample test, zero lied outside the 95%
CI of estimation stats, but the p-value for the t-test (Mann Whitney)
was 0.054, and non-significant. Now I know that significance thinking
should be abandoned, but how would you best interpret/phrase the result
for a journal? (Or in general when estimation stats and significance
testing don't agree on the outcome...)
Ignore the p-value and focus on the effect size. Is the effect interesting? This puts responsibility in your hands where it belongs.
Adam
Yajing Xu
unread,
Jan 19, 2021, 5:35:14 PM1/19/21
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to estimationstats
Thanks for the reply!
One more question: I have seen that sometimes that the permutation t-test returns the value 0 - is this because the the value is too small to be accurately calculated? If yes, what is the cut-off? I want to put the p-values in supplementary for my paper, so I was wondering how to report that, e.g. P <0.0001 or sth like that? Thanks again!