Vlan routing issues

30 views
Skip to first unread message

Curtis Grice

unread,
Sep 21, 2017, 2:04:50 PM9/21/17
to esos-users
I noticed an odd issue with hoe the vlan interfaces are handled. Heres what happened:

Fresh install (with ZFS)
add vlan99 on en1
In TUI set default GW to 192.168.99.1
Set en1.99 IP to 192.168.99.25
Set netmask, bcast, etc
Set en1 to 192.168.1.25
netmask, bcast, etc
disabled en1.99
Set en1 to 192.168.99.25

this leaves the box unable to ping any device on the network other than its own IPs.

Checking the route table I see a route for 192.168.99.0 still on en1.99.

I would expect that when an interface is disabled in the TUI, the corresponding routes also get removed.

Is this a bug or am I crazy?

Marc Smith

unread,
Sep 21, 2017, 2:09:14 PM9/21/17
to esos-...@googlegroups.com
Hi Curtis,


On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Curtis Grice <curti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed an odd issue with hoe the vlan interfaces are handled. Heres what
> happened:
>
> Fresh install (with ZFS)

What version of ESOS?


> add vlan99 on en1
> In TUI set default GW to 192.168.99.1
> Set en1.99 IP to 192.168.99.25
> Set netmask, bcast, etc
> Set en1 to 192.168.1.25
> netmask, bcast, etc
> disabled en1.99
> Set en1 to 192.168.99.25
>
> this leaves the box unable to ping any device on the network other than its
> own IPs.
>
> Checking the route table I see a route for 192.168.99.0 still on en1.99.
>
> I would expect that when an interface is disabled in the TUI, the
> corresponding routes also get removed.
>
> Is this a bug or am I crazy?

I assume you restarted networking after making changes, to apply the
settings? Can you provide the output of the following:
cat /etc/network.conf
netstat -rn
ifconfig -a


--Marc


>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "esos-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to esos-users+...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages