my dear Brothers and Sisters of eShakha,
I found following article during net surfing. I would not quote its completely true or false.
at your own levels check its Authenticity and forward it to as many friends of yours as possible.
dhanyawad. Jay shreeram.
Milind.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERESTING HISTORY!
At the very beginning of
his book, "The
Nehru Dynasty",
astrologer K.N.Rao mentions the names of Jawaharlal's father and grandfather. Jawahar Lal's father was believed to
be Motilal and Motilal's father was one Gangadhar Nehru.
And we all know that
Jawaharlal's only daughter was Indira
Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis.
She was totally against Indira's
proposed marriage with Feroze.
Why? No one tells us that!
Now, who is this Feroze? We are told by many that he was the son of the family grocer.
The grocer supplied wines,etc. to
Anand Bhavan (previously known as Ishrat Manzil)
What was the family grocer's
name? One
frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru.
But then we all know that
everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal
grandfathers. In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more
important grandfather in most societies. Why is it then, no where, we find Rajiv Gandhi's paternal
grandfather's name?
It appears that the reason is simply this. Rajiv Gandhi's
paternal grandfather was a Muslim
gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat.
This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam.
This is the source where
from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived.
Rajiv's father Feroze, was Feroze
Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru's wishes.
Feroze's mother's
family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to
Gandhi,sometime before his wedding with Indira, by an affidavit.
The fact of the matter
is that (and
this fact can be found in many writings) Indira was very lonely.
Chased out of the ShantiniketanUniversity by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for
misdemeanor, the lonely girl was all by herself,
while father Jawahar was busy with
politics, pretty women and illicit sex;
the mother was in hospital.
Feroze Khan, the grocer's son
was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to
Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim
woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque.
Nehru was not happy; Kamala
was dead already or dying. The news of this marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (better
known as Mahatma Gandhi).
Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him
to ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It
had nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hinduism for
instance.
It
was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze
Khan became Feroze Gandhi.
The surprising thing is that the
apostle of truth,
the old man soon to be declared India's Mahatma and the 'Father of the Nation' didn't mention
this game of his in the famous book, 'My Experiments with Truth'. Why?
When they returned to India, a mock 'Vedic marriage' was
instituted for public consumption.
On this subject,writes M.O. Mathai (a
longtime Private Secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI! ) 'Reminiscences of the Nehru Age' on
page94, second paragraph: "For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to
be performed according to Vedic rites in 1942. An inter-religious and
inter-caste marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in
law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage."
It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and
Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced.
Feroze used to harass
Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's political
activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into
the Prime Minister's residence
Trimurthi Bhavan.
Mathai writes that the
death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death
of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political forces,
is itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to remarry.
Those who try to keep
tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions and deliberate
misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of Indira (or
Mrs.Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze.
He was the son of another Muslim
gentleman, Mohammad Yunus.
Here, in passing, we might mention
that the second son was originally named Sanjiv. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's name.
It was changed to Sanjay when he was arrested by the British
police in England and his passport impounded, for
having stolen a car.
Krishna Menon was then India's High Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon who changed his name to Sanjay.
Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka(now they call her Maneka for Indira
Gandhi found the name of mythological Lord Indra's Court dancer rather
offensive !!)
took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus's house in New Delhi.
And the marriage with Menaka who was a
model (She had model for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel)was not so ordinary either.
Sanjay was notorious in
getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered pregnant by
Sanjay.
It
was then that her father,Colonel Anand, threatened Sanjay with dire
consequences if he did not marry her daughter. And that did the trick.
Sanjay married Menaka. It was
widely reported in Delhi
at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay
with Menaka.
Apparently
he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice.
It was Mohammad Yunus who
cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane accident.
Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards.
At least one case is very
graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his "Reminiscences of the
NehruAge", page 206.
Mathai writes:
"In the autumn of 1948 a young woman from Benares arrived in New Delhi as a sanyasini named Shraddha Mata
(an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed
in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology. People, including MPs,
thronged to her to hear her discourses. One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's
old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave
her an interview in the PM's house. As she departed, I noticed (Mathai
is speaking here) that she was young, shapely and beautiful.
Meetings of Nehru with her became rather frequent, mostly after he
finished his work at night. During one of Nehru's visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there and
Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply
and she visited Nehru at midnight...“
Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared.
In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said
that a young woman from northern India
arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy.
She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself.
She left the convent as
soon as she was well enough to move out but left the child behind.
She however forgot to take
with her a small cloth bundle in which, among other things, several
letters in Hindi were found. The Mother Superior, who was a foreigner,
had the letters examined and was told they were from the Prime Minister.
The
person who brought the letters surrendered them..."I (Mathai) made
discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue
about his hereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely
tightlipped and secretive.
Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I
would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully
ignorant of who his father was."
Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi,
we all know now that he
changed his so called Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy.
Rajiv became Roberto.
His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul.
Quite
cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul.
What is amazing is the
extent of our people's ignorance in such matters.
The press conference that
Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as Prime minister of India was very informative. In this press
conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi.
Mind you, speaking of the
Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all.
His grandmother (father's mother) had
turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi religion to marry Nawab
Khan.
It is the western press that waged a blitz of
misinformation on behalf of Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los
Angeles Times and the Washington Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to
heaven.
The
children's encyclopedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical
Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in the
world today!
The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at
that University Rajiv had not passed a single exam. He had therefore to
leave Cambridge without a certificate.
Sonia too had the same
benevolent treatment. She was stated to be a student in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to
mislead Indians. She
was a student in Cambridge all right, but not of the University of Cambridge , but of one of those fly by night
language schools where foreign students come to learn English. Sonia
was working as an 'au pair' girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the
same time.
And
surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic rites in full view of India's public.
This is the Nehru
dynasty that India worships and now a foreigner leads
a prestigious national party because of just one qualification
being married into the Nehru family.
Maneka Gandhi, though Indian, herself
is being accepted by the non-Congress parties not
because she was a former model or an animal lover, but for
her links to the Nehru family.
Saying that an Italian (or any
foreigner) should not lead India will
amount to narrow mindedness, but if Sania Maino (now Sonia) had served India like, say,
Mother Teresa or Annie Besant, i.e. in anyway on her own rights,
then all Indians should be proud of her just as how proud we are of
Mother Teresa.
OR
Saying that any other party which comes to rule India is better is again equally worse.
The point is Indians who nominate the people to
stand in these elections; and the people who vote their rulers (i.e. the
authorities) must know that truth eventually come out some day.
Dont allow the famous land of India (our motherland) to be looked down
by others.
--
--
M.Sc.- Ing. Milind Shende
Professur Schaltkreis- und Systementwurf (SSE)
Technische Universität - Chemnitz.
Reichenhainer Str. 70, Weinholdbau, Zi. 411
09126 Chemnitz, Germany
Tel.:
+49 (0)371/531-37781Fax.:
+49 (0)9131/761-360Homepage:
http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/etit/sse/mailto:
milind...@etit.tu-chemnitz.de