Trying to support mips64r2, but nBranches is not accurate

12 views

Skip to first unread message

ZHAO KANG

unread,

Nov 7, 2019, 10:43:32 PM11/7/19

to ESESC

We are trying to use ESESC with mips64r2. Should we do some changes on Qemu sources?

The graph below shows the Error Rate of nBranches and nCommit Trace: nBranches Trace.png

Jose Renau

unread,

Nov 7, 2019, 11:51:38 PM11/7/19

to ESESC

Current esesc uses mipsR6. My guess is that you need to extend translate.c in qemu to also instrument the pending r2 instructions.

If you patch it, I can review the pull request

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:43 PM ZHAO KANG <kkzha...@gmail.com> wrote:

We are trying to use ESESC with mips64r2. Should we do some changes on Qemu sources?
The graph below shows the Error Rate of nBranches and nCommit Trace:

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ESESC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to esesc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/esesc/cfa2d34c-d388-4e2f-b305-5484594cd38d%40googlegroups.com.

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:43 PM ZHAO KANG <kkzha...@gmail.com> wrote:

We are trying to use ESESC with mips64r2. Should we do some changes on Qemu sources?
The graph below shows the Error Rate of nBranches and nCommit Trace:

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ESESC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to esesc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/esesc/cfa2d34c-d388-4e2f-b305-5484594cd38d%40googlegroups.com.

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward

0 new messages