Philip Asare
unread,Dec 8, 2010, 7:18:00 PM12/8/10Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ese519upe...@googlegroups.com
Pick a question and let me know which one you picked. I will submit mine last.
Philip
Car Hacks
1. If the car network is supposed to allow access for diagnostics and upgrades, but also protect itself from attacks, what stops a malicious attacker action as a "diagnostic tool" from having unauthorized access?
2. Do we need to take another look at the CAN bus since it clearly was designed under the assumption that all devices on the network will play nice? Or should ECUs implement their own defense mechanisms?
3. In most systems, even if we cannot prevent or fix an error, we can at least detect it. Are there any ideas on how to detect these attacks, even if they cannot be prevented?
ICD attacks
1. The authors suggest that there needs to be a balance between security and privacy, and safety and effectiveness. What causes these trade-offs and when can security and privacy get in the way of safety and effectiveness?
2. The authors say that in wireless systems, firewalls may not bee enough, and that protecting the wireless links themselves may be necessary. Why is this the case?
3. The authors used replay attacks to compromise the ICD device. This seems like a simple mechanism requiring listening to the programmer and replaying "messages" recorded. Is it possible to guard against such attacks? If so, how does one guard against such attacks?