I don't really understand the list posted on SOCIS 2014 FAQ
http://sophia.estec.esa.int/socis/?q=faq#socis_elig_student_whoFor the reference I will quote here the list of eligible countries:
The institution must be based in in one of the following states:
Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Norway,
Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Hungary,
Poland, Estonia, Slovenia and Romania
Why this list and why this order?
This list is not a list of ESA member states, as it has 4 extra states: Canada, Estonia, Hungary and Slovenia.
I understand Canada has a special status, as it is part of ESA council, but the other three are only part of PECS. I don't want to go into politics to say if these countries should, or should not be in the program. In my opinion, the more the merrier, but there are 4 (not 3) countries part of PECS, and Latvia has been, apparently, excluded from the list of eligible ESA SOCIS states. If this is truly the case and it's not just an oversight, I think the reasoning behind this should be made public.
One other problem with this list is that it seems to be arbitrary, at best, if not alphabetically, but just for some states. In my opinion, a fully alphabetical list would be the best choice, but any other obvious sorting choice is in order like, by joining date, status(full member, associate, etc) or € contribution.
Also, around 25% of the budget comes from EU, why shouldn't all EU countries benefit from the SOCIS program then?
OK, I admit, the last one is entering a little bit into a political issue and most likely it cannot be solved on this mailing list, but I think it is still a valid point.
To restate my question: Does anyone know why this list and why this order?