[ESA-announce] Society for Judgment and Decision Making 2010 meeting and call for abstracts

Skip to first unread message

Jonathan Baron

May 10, 2010, 6:35:40 PM5/10/10
to jdm-s...@mail.sjdm.org, sjdm-m...@mail.sjdm.org, esa-an...@googlegroups.com, brun...@yahoogroups.com, ead...@nic.surfnet.nl, smd...@finzi.psych.upenn.edu
Information about the 2010 meeting and the call for abstracts is now
available in http://www.sjdm.org .

Jon (Webmaster)
Jonathan Baron, Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania
Home page: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron

Want to discuss this post, or anything related to experimental economics, with other ESA members and friends? Send your followup post to the discussion list at esa-d...@googlegroups.com.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "ESA Announcements" group.
To post to this group, send email to esa-an...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at


Oct 5, 2010, 2:16:46 AM10/5/10
to jdm-s...@mail.sjdm.org, esa-an...@googlegroups.com, ead...@nic.surfnet.nl
Hi: We write to inform you of the results of Games 1st choice prediction
competition. The competition focused on the prediction of behavior in repeated
Market Entry Game. We ran two sets of experiments. We published the results of
the first set, and challenged other researchers to predict the result of the
second set (see http://sites.google.com/site/gpredcomp).

Twenty-two different teams participated in the competition. The total number of
submissions was 25.

The winners are Wei Chen, Chih-Han Chen, Yi-Shan Lee, and Shu-Yu Liu from
National Taiwan University.

The runners up are Tomן¿½s Lejarraga, Varun Dutt, and Cleotilde Gonzalez from
Carnegie Mellon University.

The winners and the runners up were invited to submit papers to Games that
describe their models in detail. Here is a short summary:

The winning model refines I-SAW (the best baseline model described in the
competition website) by the addition of the assumption of a limited memory
span. The refined model assumes: (1) Reliance on a small sample of past
experiences, (2) Strong inertia and recency effects, and (3) Surprise triggers

The runner up model is based upon the Instance Based Learning (IBL) theory
proposed by Gonzalez, Lerch, and Lebiere (2003). The basic assumptions of this
model are: retrieval of past set of experiences of outcomes weighted by their
probability of retrieval from memory (i.e., blending mechanism); dependence on
recency and frequency of past experienced outcomes; and, an inertia mechanism
that depends upon surprise as a function of blended outcomes.

The results support two main suggestions:

(1) Models that assume reliance on small samples of past experiences have a
large advantage over models that assume reliance on running averages of the
previous payoffs (like traditional reinforcement learning and fictitious play

(2) The difference between learning in market entry games, and learning in
individual choice tasks is not large. Indeed, the best models in the current
competition can be described as refinements of the best models in our previous
competition that focused in individual repeated choice task (see Erev et al.,

The raw data from the 80 repeated market entry games that were run in the
current competition can be found in http://sites.google.com/site/gpredcomp.
The raw data from the 120 repeated choice problems that were run in our
previous competition can be found in
http://tx.technion.ac.il/~erev/Comp/Comp.html. We encourage you to use these
data sets, to improve our understanding of the effect of experience on economic

Best, Ido Erev, Eyal Ert, Alvin E. Roth

Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages