Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Diego Mas Howard aka Diego Mas Marques
491 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
b74...@gmail.com
Sep 4, 2018, 2:36:10 AM9/4/18
to
بتاريخ الثلاثاء، 17 أكتوبر، 2017 7:47:58 م UTC-4، كتب 302igh239pgh:
> Eso es lo que hay que tener para atreverse a denunciar la verdad sobre el
> trato de favor en forma de sentencias blandas que están recibiendo las
> mujeres que matan a algún miembro de su familia.
> Este diario de las Islas Baleares ha recogido 10 casos de muertes violentas
> recientes ocurridas en las islas y las correspondientes condenas dictadas
> por la Audiencia Provincial de Palma, 5 son hombres y 5 son mujeres, el
> diario no comenta nada, se limita a exponerlo para que el lector saque sus
> conclusiones.
>
> Un medio de comunicación tiene que tener mucho valor para atreverse a
> desvelar la verdad en medio del ambiente feminista que está presente en
> todas partes.
>
>
> http://www.ultimahora.es/segunda.dba?876+6+131038
>
>
> Diez casos de muertes violentas ocurridos en la Isla tienen distintas
> condenas
> En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en
> la Audiencia Provincial de Palma
>
>
> PEP MATAS
> ¿Somos iguales ante la ley? o, por qué no preguntárselo, ante la justicia.
> En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en
> la Audiencia Provincial de Palma. Cinco condenas son para hombres y otras
> tantas para mujeres, aunque tampoco se trata de centrar exclusivamente entre
> ambo sexos las posibles diferencias y la relación entre el hecho y el
> castigo. Todos los casos son o han sido muy conocidos y comentados en todos
> los estratos de nuestra sociedad. Está claro que cada uno es distinto a la
> hora de ser juzgado. Ahí queda la pregunta.
>
> Peter Oyntzen. El asesino de sa Coma
> Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Treinta y cuatro años. Situación
> actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de
> Palma.
>
> Yasser Ahmed. El parricida de Palma
> Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Ocho años. Situación actual: Se encuentra
> cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma.
>
> Miguel Orbe.El asesino que no mató a nadie
> Delito: Quiso matar a su ex mujer. Condena: Más de doce años. Situación
> actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el establecimiento
> penitenciario de El Dueso (Santander).
>
> Diego Mas Howard aka Diego Mas Marques. El homicida de Son Caliu
> Delito: Mató a Tatiana Vassic. Condena: Quince años. Situación actual: Se
> encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma.
>
> José García. El asesino de Manacor
> Delito: Asesinó a tiros a su compañera. Condena: Dieciseis años y medio.
> Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro
> penitenciario de Palma.
>
> Mónica Krieger La parricida de Portocolom
> Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Estar en un Psiquiátrico. Situación
> actual: pocos años después de los hechos se fue del Psiquiátrico de Palma y
> ahora vive en la Península con un hombre y ha tenido otro hijo.
>
> Belén Gil La parricida de Calviá
> Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Seis años y un día. Situación actual: Fue
> asesinada por Bartolomé Clar Camacho en un permiso de salida de la cárcel
> por las fiestas de Navidad que ambos obtuvieron.
>
> Sandra Weber La homicida de Cala Millor
> Delito: Quiso matar a su marido Condena: Absuelta. Situación actual:Vive en
> Alemania. Su marido asistió al juicio que se celebró en Palma y dijo que le
> perdonaba. Ambos vinieron a la Isla en viaje de vacaciones.
>
> Catalina Juan. La homicida de Illetes
> Delito:Mató a su ex marido. Condena:Cinco años. Situación actual:Ingresó
> hace tres años en la cárcel de Palma y en la actualidad está en situación de
> Tercer Grado, por lo que sólo tiene que ir al centro a dormir.
>
> Paula Varela La homicida de Can Tápara
> Delito:Mató a su novio. Condena:Siete años. Situación actual:Está ingresada
> en la cárcel de Palma desde que ocurrieron los hechos, en septiembre de
> 1999. Esta semana se ha conocido la sentencia.
>
> Somos un grupo de personas que estamos organizando una Plataforma para
> luchar contra la discriminación de los Hombres en todos los ámbitos, para
> tener fuerza es necesario que seamos muchos, si quieres unirte a esta
> Plataforma en favor de los derechos de los Hombres suscríbete a la lista de
> correo que encontrarás en
> http://www.eListas.net/lista/hombresdiscriminados
> no es necesario que aportes ningún dato personal, tan sólo la dirección de
> correo que quieras suscribir.
> Esta lista es el punto de encuentro que dará origen a la futura asociación.
> Par más información: deliriu...@my-deja.com
>
> Eso es lo que hay que tener para atreverse a denunciar la verdad sobre el
> trato de favor en forma de sentencias blandas que están recibiendo las
> mujeres que matan a algún miembro de su familia.
> Este diario de las Islas Baleares ha recogido 10 casos de muertes violentas
> recientes ocurridas en las islas y las correspondientes condenas dictadas
> por la Audiencia Provincial de Palma, 5 son hombres y 5 son mujeres, el
> diario no comenta nada, se limita a exponerlo para que el lector saque sus
> conclusiones.
>
> Un medio de comunicación tiene que tener mucho valor para atreverse a
> desvelar la verdad en medio del ambiente feminista que está presente en
> todas partes.
>
>
> http://www.ultimahora.es/segunda.dba?876+6+131038
>
>
> Diez casos de muertes violentas ocurridos en la Isla tienen distintas
> condenas
> En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en
> la Audiencia Provincial de Palma
>
>
> PEP MATAS
> ¿Somos iguales ante la ley? o, por qué no preguntárselo, ante la justicia.
> En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en
> la Audiencia Provincial de Palma. Cinco condenas son para hombres y otras
> tantas para mujeres, aunque tampoco se trata de centrar exclusivamente entre
> ambo sexos las posibles diferencias y la relación entre el hecho y el
> castigo. Todos los casos son o han sido muy conocidos y comentados en todos
> los estratos de nuestra sociedad. Está claro que cada uno es distinto a la
> hora de ser juzgado. Ahí queda la pregunta.
>
> Peter Oyntzen. El asesino de sa Coma
> Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Treinta y cuatro años. Situación
> actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de
> Palma.
>
> Yasser Ahmed. El parricida de Palma
> Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Ocho años. Situación actual: Se encuentra
> cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma.
>
> Miguel Orbe.El asesino que no mató a nadie
> Delito: Quiso matar a su ex mujer. Condena: Más de doce años. Situación
> actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el establecimiento
> penitenciario de El Dueso (Santander).
>
> Diego Mas Howard. El homicida de Son Caliu
> Delito: Mató a Tatiana Vassic. Condena: Quince años. Situación actual: Se
> encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma.
>
> José García. El asesino de Manacor
> Delito: Asesinó a tiros a su compañera. Condena: Dieciseis años y medio.
> Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro
> penitenciario de Palma.
>
> Mónica Krieger La parricida de Portocolom
> Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Estar en un Psiquiátrico. Situación
> actual: pocos años después de los hechos se fue del Psiquiátrico de Palma y
> ahora vive en la Península con un hombre y ha tenido otro hijo.
>
> Belén Gil La parricida de Calviá
> Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Seis años y un día. Situación actual: Fue
> asesinada por Bartolomé Clar Camacho en un permiso de salida de la cárcel
> por las fiestas de Navidad que ambos obtuvieron.
>
> Sandra Weber La homicida de Cala Millor
> Delito: Quiso matar a su marido Condena: Absuelta. Situación actual:Vive en
> Alemania. Su marido asistió al juicio que se celebró en Palma y dijo que le
> perdonaba. Ambos vinieron a la Isla en viaje de vacaciones.
>
> Catalina Juan. La homicida de Illetes
> Delito:Mató a su ex marido. Condena:Cinco años. Situación actual:Ingresó
> hace tres años en la cárcel de Palma y en la actualidad está en situación de
> Tercer Grado, por lo que sólo tiene que ir al centro a dormir.
>
> Paula Varela La homicida de Can Tápara
> Delito:Mató a su novio. Condena:Siete años. Situación actual:Está ingresada
> en la cárcel de Palma desde que ocurrieron los hechos, en septiembre de
> 1999. Esta semana se ha conocido la sentencia.
>
> Somos un grupo de personas que estamos organizando una Plataforma para
> luchar contra la discriminación de los Hombres en todos los ámbitos, para
> tener fuerza es necesario que seamos muchos, si quieres unirte a esta
> Plataforma en favor de los derechos de los Hombres suscríbete a la lista de
> correo que encontrarás en
> http://www.eListas.net/lista/hombresdiscriminados
> no es necesario que aportes ningún dato personal, tan sólo la dirección de
> correo que quieras suscribir.
> Esta lista es el punto de encuentro que dará origen a la futura asociación.
> Par más información: deliriu...@my-deja.com
>
>
>
> That's what you need to have to dare to report the truth about the
> preferential treatment in the form of soft sentences are receiving
> women who kill any member of your family.
> This newspaper of the Balearic Islands has collected 10 cases of violent
> deaths
> Recent that occurred on the islands and corresponding sentences
> by the Provincial Court of Palma, five are men and 5 are women,
> newspaper says nothing, merely to expose the reader to draw his
> conclusions.
>
> A media must have a lot of courage to dare
> reveal the truth in the midst of the feminist environment that is present in
> everywhere.
>
>
> http://www.ultimahora.es/segunda.dba?876+6+131038
>
>
> Ten cases of violent deaths that occurred on the island have different
> convictions
> In this report we have limited ourselves to publish ten judgments
> the Provincial Court of Palma
>
>
> PEP MATAS
> Are we equal before the law? or, why not ask, to justice.
> In this report we have limited ourselves to publish ten judgments
> the Provincial Court of Palma. Five convictions are for men and others
> many women, but neither is focusing solely between
> both sexes potential differences and the relationship between fact and
> punishment. All cases are or have been well known and discussed in all
> strata of our society. It is clear that each is different from the
> time trial. That is the question.
>
> Peter Oyntzen. The murderer of sa Coma
> Crime: He killed his two sons. Sentence: Thirty-four years. Situation
> Current: he is serving the sentence in the penitentiary
> Palm.
>
> Yasser Ahmed. The parricide in Palma
> Crime: He killed his father. Sentence: Eight years. Current status: Found
> serving his sentence in the prison of Palma.
>
> Miguel Orbe.El murderer did not kill anyone
> Crime: I wanted to kill his ex-wife. Sentence: More than twelve years.
> Situation
> Current: he is serving the sentence in the establishment
> prison of Dueso (Santander).
>
> Diego Mas Howard aka Diego Mas Marques. The murder of Son Caliu
> Crime: He killed Tatiana Vassic. Sentence: Fifteen years. Current status:
> serving his sentence in the prison of Palma.
>
> José García. The murderer of Manacor
> Crime: shot dead his partner. Sentence: sixteen and a half years.
> Current situation is serving the sentence in the middle
> Palma prison.
>
> The Mónica Krieger parricida Portocolom
> Crime: He killed his two sons. Sentence: Being in a psychiatric
> hospital. Situation
> Now: a few years after the events went Psychiatric de Palma
> now he lives in the Peninsula with a man and had another son.
>
> The parricide Belén Gil Calvia
> Crime: He killed his father. Sentence: Six years and one day. Current
> situation: It was
> Clar killed by Bartholomew Camacho in an exit permit from prison
> for Christmas parties both they obtained.
>
> The murder of Sandra Weber Cala Millor
> Crime: He wanted to kill her husband Sentence: acquitted. Current
> situation: Live in
> Germany. Her husband attended the trial held in Palma and said he
> She forgave him. Both came to the island on vacation trip.
>
> Catalina Juan. The murder of Illetes
> Crime: He killed her ex-husband. Sentence: Five years. Current
> situation: Joined
> three years ago in Palma prison and now he is in a position
> Third grade, so just go downtown to sleep.
>
> Paula Varela's murder Can Tapara
> Crime: He killed her boyfriend. Sentence: Seven years. Current
> situation: It is entered
> Palma in prison since the events occurred in September
> 1999. This week has known the sentence.
>
> We are a group of people who are organizing a Platform
> combat discrimination of men in all areas, for
> have strength we need to be many if you want to join this
> Platform for the Rights of Men Subscribe to the list
> mail you'll find
> http://www.eListas.net/lista/hombresdiscriminados
> do not need to input any personal data, only the address
> mail you want to subscribe.
> This list is the meeting point which results in the future association.
> Par more information: deliriu...@my-deja.com
>
>
> UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) v. ) ) ) Cr. No. 09-10304-MLW
> DIEGO MASMARQUES, Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WOLF, D.J.
> September 22, 2015 Defendant Diego MasMarques has filed a Motion to
> Seal, asking the court to seal the record of this case on the PACER
> system and to remove the record from the Federal Bureau of
> Investigation's ("FBI") National Criminal Information Center ("NCIC")
> database (the "Motion"). The Motion is being denied for the reasons
> explained below. I. BACKGROUND On July 17, 2000, MasMarques, who is an
> American citizen, was convicted of two counts of burglary and one count
> of willful homicide in Spain. The Spanish court sentenced him to one
> year in prison on the first burglary count, two years in prison on the
> second burglary count, and twelve years in prison on the homicide count.
> In 2005, pursuant to a Transfer Treaty, he was transferred to the
> United States to serve the remainder of his sentence. Prior to his
> transfer to the United States, MasMarques signed a form consenting to
> serve the remainder of his sentence Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7
> Filed 09/22/15 Page 1 of 7
> 2 according to the laws of the United States. By signing the form, he
> agreed that his "conviction or sentence can only be modified or set
> aside through appropriate proceedings brought by me or on my behalf in
> Spain." See Feb. 13, 2006 Verification of Consent to Transfer (Docket
> No. 1-4). MasMarques's case was initially assigned to the Eastern
> District of Wisconsin for performance of the verification proceedings
> required by 18 U.S.C. §4108. On August 20, 2008, MasMarques was
> released to a three-year term of supervised release in the Southern
> District of New York. On June 2, 2009, with the permission of the
> Probation Office, MasMarques moved to Woburn, Massachusetts. As a
> result, his case was transferred to this court for supervision during
> the remainder of his period of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C.
> §4106A(b)(3). On January 18, 2013, MasMarques, acting pro se, filed a
> motion requesting that the court seal the record of his conviction in
> Spain. In addition, he requests that the court remove a negative
> "alert" that appears in the FBI's NCIC database. He claims that the
> availability of his criminal record has harmed his ability to find a
> job. He maintains that allowing this criminal record to be publicly
> accessible violates his rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause. Case
> 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 2 of 7
> 3 II. DISCUSSION MasMarques's Motion to Seal presents four issues:
> (1) whether public availability of his criminal record constitutes a
> second punishment in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the
> Fifth Amendment; (2) whether the court should seal the record of his
> conviction; (3) whether the court has authority to order the removal of
> the negative "alert" based on his case that appears in the FBI's NCIC
> database; and (4) whether the court has authority to expunge
> MasMarques's criminal record. MasMarques is proceeding pro se.
> Therefore, his motion will be construed liberally. See Erickson v.
> Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). Nevertheless, there is no legal
> basis to grant the relief that he requests. Therefore, his Motion is
> being denied. A. Double Jeopardy The Double Jeopardy Clause
> "safeguards an individual against (1) a second prosecution for the same
> offense, following an acquittal; (2) a second prosecution for the same
> offense, following a conviction; and (3) multiple punishments for the
> same offense." United States v. Stoller, 78 F.3d 710, 714 (1st Cir.
> 1996) (quoting United States v. Rivera-Martinez, 931 F.3d 148, 152 (1st
> Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 862 (1991)). "The Clause protects only
> against the imposition of multiple criminal punishments for the same
> offense . . . and then only when such Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document
> 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 3 of 7
> 4 occurs in successive proceedings." Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S.
> 93, 99 (1997) (emphasis in original). In determining whether a
> government action is "punishment" for purposes of the Double Jeopardy
> Clause, courts examine the totality of the circumstances to determine
> whether its objectives or effects are "punitive" in nature. See
> Stoller, 78 F.3d at 721. The public availability of the records of
> MasMarques's conviction under the PACER, CORI, and NCIS system is not
> a "punishment" in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. Many courts
> have recognized that "[t]he dissemination of accurate public record
> information concerning an individual's past criminal activities holds
> "the potential for substantial negative consequences." E.B. v.
> Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1099 (3d Cir. 1997). "Nevertheless, our laws'
> insistence that information regarding criminal proceedings be publicly
> disseminated is not intended as punishment and has never been regarded
> as such." Id. at 1100. The purpose of these systems is "regulatory,"
> and they, therefore, are "not punishment even though it may bear
> harshly on one affected." Doe v. Pataki, 120 F.3d 1263, 1279 (2d Cir.
> 1997) (quoting Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 613 (1960).
> Furthermore, the negative effects of publicly disseminating criminal
> records do not "implicate any interest of fundamental constitutional
> magnitude." See Verniero, 119 F.3d at 1103. Therefore, the
> availability of the Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15
> Page 4 of 7
> 5 PACER records, the NCIC alerts, and the resulting negative effects
> do not constitute a second punishment in violation of the Double
> Jeopardy Clause. B. Sealing MasMarques's Court Records In the United
> States, there is a common law presumption of public access to judicial
> records. See Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978);
> United States v. Kravetz, 706 F.3d 47, 62 (1st Cir. 2013). This
> presumption "stems from the premise that public monitoring of the
> judicial system fosters the important values of 'quality, honesty and
> respect for our legal system.'" Siedle v. Putnam Investments, Inc.,
> 147 F.3d 7, 9-10 (1st Cir. 1998). Furthermore, Congress has recognized
> a "compelling public need" to keep criminal records publicly available.
> United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536, 539 (2d Cir. 1977). When
> evaluating a motion to seal a court record, the court "carefully
> balances the competing interests that are at stake in the particular
> case." Siedle, 147 F.3d at 10. MasMarques contends that it is unfair
> to allow the record of his case to be publicly accessible through the
> court's PACER system because public availability of the record has
> made it difficult for him to find a job . If courts were to allow the
> stigma resulting from the public record of a case to outweigh the
> public right of access, then virtually all criminal records Case
> 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 5 of 7
> 6 would be sealed. The balance might lean more in MasMarques's favor
> if he had been acquitted or exonerated of the charges in Spain. See
> Diamond v. United States, 649 F.2d 496, 499 (7th Cir. 1981).
> However, the presumptive public right of access to court records is not
> outweighed solely because the record has an adverse effect on the
> defendant's livelihood, as such rule would vitiate the presumptive
> public right of access. Indeed, "courts must be reluctant to
> substitute their judgment for that of employers, legislators, and others
> in whom the discretion to give second chances is more properly vested."
> United States v. Barrow, 06-Cr-1086(JFK), 2014 WL 2011689, at *2.
> Consequently, the court is denying MasMarques's request to seal the
> record of this case. C. Removing the "Alert" from the NCIC Database
> 28 U.S.C. §534 directs the Attorney General to maintain a criminal
> records database. MasMarques complains that his criminal record is
> accessible in this database. However, courts are without authority to
> order removal of a criminal record from the NCIC database. See Carter
> v. United States, 431 Fed. Appx. 104, 105-06 (3d Cir. 2011); United
> States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 875 (6th Cir. 2010). Therefore, the
> court must deny MasMarques's request. Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW
> Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 6 of 7
> 7 D. Expunging MasMarques's Criminal Record MasMarques also appears
> to request that the cou rt expunge the American court records of his
> convictions in Spain. However, federal courts lack subject matter
> jurisdiction to expunge criminal records based solely on "equitable
> reasons," meaning "grounds that rely only on notions of fairness and are
> entirely divorced from legal considerations." United States v. Coloian,
> 480 F.3d 47, 52 (1st Cir. 2009). MasMarques provides no legal basis to
> expunge his record. The court does not have jurisdiction to expunge his
> record on these grounds. See id. III. ORDER In view of the foregoing,
> it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Seal (Docket No. 4) is
> DENIED. /s/ Mark L. Wolf UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
> Eso es lo que hay que tener para atreverse a denunciar la verdad sobre el
> trato de favor en forma de sentencias blandas que están recibiendo las
> mujeres que matan a algún miembro de su familia.
> Este diario de las Islas Baleares ha recogido 10 casos de muertes violentas
> recientes ocurridas en las islas y las correspondientes condenas dictadas
> por la Audiencia Provincial de Palma, 5 son hombres y 5 son mujeres, el
> diario no comenta nada, se limita a exponerlo para que el lector saque sus
> conclusiones.
>
> Un medio de comunicación tiene que tener mucho valor para atreverse a
> desvelar la verdad en medio del ambiente feminista que está presente en
> todas partes.
>
>
> http://www.ultimahora.es/segunda.dba?876+6+131038
>
>
> Diez casos de muertes violentas ocurridos en la Isla tienen distintas
> condenas
> En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en
> la Audiencia Provincial de Palma
>
>
> PEP MATAS
> ¿Somos iguales ante la ley? o, por qué no preguntárselo, ante la justicia.
> En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en
> la Audiencia Provincial de Palma. Cinco condenas son para hombres y otras
> tantas para mujeres, aunque tampoco se trata de centrar exclusivamente entre
> ambo sexos las posibles diferencias y la relación entre el hecho y el
> castigo. Todos los casos son o han sido muy conocidos y comentados en todos
> los estratos de nuestra sociedad. Está claro que cada uno es distinto a la
> hora de ser juzgado. Ahí queda la pregunta.
>
> Peter Oyntzen. El asesino de sa Coma
> Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Treinta y cuatro años. Situación
> actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de
> Palma.
>
> Yasser Ahmed. El parricida de Palma
> Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Ocho años. Situación actual: Se encuentra
> cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma.
>
> Miguel Orbe.El asesino que no mató a nadie
> Delito: Quiso matar a su ex mujer. Condena: Más de doce años. Situación
> actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el establecimiento
> penitenciario de El Dueso (Santander).
>
> Diego Mas Howard aka Diego Mas Marques. El homicida de Son Caliu
> Delito: Mató a Tatiana Vassic. Condena: Quince años. Situación actual: Se
> encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma.
>
> José García. El asesino de Manacor
> Delito: Asesinó a tiros a su compañera. Condena: Dieciseis años y medio.
> Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro
> penitenciario de Palma.
>
> Mónica Krieger La parricida de Portocolom
> Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Estar en un Psiquiátrico. Situación
> actual: pocos años después de los hechos se fue del Psiquiátrico de Palma y
> ahora vive en la Península con un hombre y ha tenido otro hijo.
>
> Belén Gil La parricida de Calviá
> Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Seis años y un día. Situación actual: Fue
> asesinada por Bartolomé Clar Camacho en un permiso de salida de la cárcel
> por las fiestas de Navidad que ambos obtuvieron.
>
> Sandra Weber La homicida de Cala Millor
> Delito: Quiso matar a su marido Condena: Absuelta. Situación actual:Vive en
> Alemania. Su marido asistió al juicio que se celebró en Palma y dijo que le
> perdonaba. Ambos vinieron a la Isla en viaje de vacaciones.
>
> Catalina Juan. La homicida de Illetes
> Delito:Mató a su ex marido. Condena:Cinco años. Situación actual:Ingresó
> hace tres años en la cárcel de Palma y en la actualidad está en situación de
> Tercer Grado, por lo que sólo tiene que ir al centro a dormir.
>
> Paula Varela La homicida de Can Tápara
> Delito:Mató a su novio. Condena:Siete años. Situación actual:Está ingresada
> en la cárcel de Palma desde que ocurrieron los hechos, en septiembre de
> 1999. Esta semana se ha conocido la sentencia.
>
> Somos un grupo de personas que estamos organizando una Plataforma para
> luchar contra la discriminación de los Hombres en todos los ámbitos, para
> tener fuerza es necesario que seamos muchos, si quieres unirte a esta
> Plataforma en favor de los derechos de los Hombres suscríbete a la lista de
> correo que encontrarás en
> http://www.eListas.net/lista/hombresdiscriminados
> no es necesario que aportes ningún dato personal, tan sólo la dirección de
> correo que quieras suscribir.
> Esta lista es el punto de encuentro que dará origen a la futura asociación.
> Par más información: deliriu...@my-deja.com
>
> Eso es lo que hay que tener para atreverse a denunciar la verdad sobre el
> trato de favor en forma de sentencias blandas que están recibiendo las
> mujeres que matan a algún miembro de su familia.
> Este diario de las Islas Baleares ha recogido 10 casos de muertes violentas
> recientes ocurridas en las islas y las correspondientes condenas dictadas
> por la Audiencia Provincial de Palma, 5 son hombres y 5 son mujeres, el
> diario no comenta nada, se limita a exponerlo para que el lector saque sus
> conclusiones.
>
> Un medio de comunicación tiene que tener mucho valor para atreverse a
> desvelar la verdad en medio del ambiente feminista que está presente en
> todas partes.
>
>
> http://www.ultimahora.es/segunda.dba?876+6+131038
>
>
> Diez casos de muertes violentas ocurridos en la Isla tienen distintas
> condenas
> En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en
> la Audiencia Provincial de Palma
>
>
> PEP MATAS
> ¿Somos iguales ante la ley? o, por qué no preguntárselo, ante la justicia.
> En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en
> la Audiencia Provincial de Palma. Cinco condenas son para hombres y otras
> tantas para mujeres, aunque tampoco se trata de centrar exclusivamente entre
> ambo sexos las posibles diferencias y la relación entre el hecho y el
> castigo. Todos los casos son o han sido muy conocidos y comentados en todos
> los estratos de nuestra sociedad. Está claro que cada uno es distinto a la
> hora de ser juzgado. Ahí queda la pregunta.
>
> Peter Oyntzen. El asesino de sa Coma
> Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Treinta y cuatro años. Situación
> actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de
> Palma.
>
> Yasser Ahmed. El parricida de Palma
> Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Ocho años. Situación actual: Se encuentra
> cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma.
>
> Miguel Orbe.El asesino que no mató a nadie
> Delito: Quiso matar a su ex mujer. Condena: Más de doce años. Situación
> actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el establecimiento
> penitenciario de El Dueso (Santander).
>
> Diego Mas Howard. El homicida de Son Caliu
> Delito: Mató a Tatiana Vassic. Condena: Quince años. Situación actual: Se
> encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma.
>
> José García. El asesino de Manacor
> Delito: Asesinó a tiros a su compañera. Condena: Dieciseis años y medio.
> Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro
> penitenciario de Palma.
>
> Mónica Krieger La parricida de Portocolom
> Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Estar en un Psiquiátrico. Situación
> actual: pocos años después de los hechos se fue del Psiquiátrico de Palma y
> ahora vive en la Península con un hombre y ha tenido otro hijo.
>
> Belén Gil La parricida de Calviá
> Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Seis años y un día. Situación actual: Fue
> asesinada por Bartolomé Clar Camacho en un permiso de salida de la cárcel
> por las fiestas de Navidad que ambos obtuvieron.
>
> Sandra Weber La homicida de Cala Millor
> Delito: Quiso matar a su marido Condena: Absuelta. Situación actual:Vive en
> Alemania. Su marido asistió al juicio que se celebró en Palma y dijo que le
> perdonaba. Ambos vinieron a la Isla en viaje de vacaciones.
>
> Catalina Juan. La homicida de Illetes
> Delito:Mató a su ex marido. Condena:Cinco años. Situación actual:Ingresó
> hace tres años en la cárcel de Palma y en la actualidad está en situación de
> Tercer Grado, por lo que sólo tiene que ir al centro a dormir.
>
> Paula Varela La homicida de Can Tápara
> Delito:Mató a su novio. Condena:Siete años. Situación actual:Está ingresada
> en la cárcel de Palma desde que ocurrieron los hechos, en septiembre de
> 1999. Esta semana se ha conocido la sentencia.
>
> Somos un grupo de personas que estamos organizando una Plataforma para
> luchar contra la discriminación de los Hombres en todos los ámbitos, para
> tener fuerza es necesario que seamos muchos, si quieres unirte a esta
> Plataforma en favor de los derechos de los Hombres suscríbete a la lista de
> correo que encontrarás en
> http://www.eListas.net/lista/hombresdiscriminados
> no es necesario que aportes ningún dato personal, tan sólo la dirección de
> correo que quieras suscribir.
> Esta lista es el punto de encuentro que dará origen a la futura asociación.
> Par más información: deliriu...@my-deja.com
>
>
>
> That's what you need to have to dare to report the truth about the
> preferential treatment in the form of soft sentences are receiving
> women who kill any member of your family.
> This newspaper of the Balearic Islands has collected 10 cases of violent
> deaths
> Recent that occurred on the islands and corresponding sentences
> by the Provincial Court of Palma, five are men and 5 are women,
> newspaper says nothing, merely to expose the reader to draw his
> conclusions.
>
> A media must have a lot of courage to dare
> reveal the truth in the midst of the feminist environment that is present in
> everywhere.
>
>
> http://www.ultimahora.es/segunda.dba?876+6+131038
>
>
> Ten cases of violent deaths that occurred on the island have different
> convictions
> In this report we have limited ourselves to publish ten judgments
> the Provincial Court of Palma
>
>
> PEP MATAS
> Are we equal before the law? or, why not ask, to justice.
> In this report we have limited ourselves to publish ten judgments
> the Provincial Court of Palma. Five convictions are for men and others
> many women, but neither is focusing solely between
> both sexes potential differences and the relationship between fact and
> punishment. All cases are or have been well known and discussed in all
> strata of our society. It is clear that each is different from the
> time trial. That is the question.
>
> Peter Oyntzen. The murderer of sa Coma
> Crime: He killed his two sons. Sentence: Thirty-four years. Situation
> Current: he is serving the sentence in the penitentiary
> Palm.
>
> Yasser Ahmed. The parricide in Palma
> Crime: He killed his father. Sentence: Eight years. Current status: Found
> serving his sentence in the prison of Palma.
>
> Miguel Orbe.El murderer did not kill anyone
> Crime: I wanted to kill his ex-wife. Sentence: More than twelve years.
> Situation
> Current: he is serving the sentence in the establishment
> prison of Dueso (Santander).
>
> Diego Mas Howard aka Diego Mas Marques. The murder of Son Caliu
> Crime: He killed Tatiana Vassic. Sentence: Fifteen years. Current status:
> serving his sentence in the prison of Palma.
>
> José García. The murderer of Manacor
> Crime: shot dead his partner. Sentence: sixteen and a half years.
> Current situation is serving the sentence in the middle
> Palma prison.
>
> The Mónica Krieger parricida Portocolom
> Crime: He killed his two sons. Sentence: Being in a psychiatric
> hospital. Situation
> Now: a few years after the events went Psychiatric de Palma
> now he lives in the Peninsula with a man and had another son.
>
> The parricide Belén Gil Calvia
> Crime: He killed his father. Sentence: Six years and one day. Current
> situation: It was
> Clar killed by Bartholomew Camacho in an exit permit from prison
> for Christmas parties both they obtained.
>
> The murder of Sandra Weber Cala Millor
> Crime: He wanted to kill her husband Sentence: acquitted. Current
> situation: Live in
> Germany. Her husband attended the trial held in Palma and said he
> She forgave him. Both came to the island on vacation trip.
>
> Catalina Juan. The murder of Illetes
> Crime: He killed her ex-husband. Sentence: Five years. Current
> situation: Joined
> three years ago in Palma prison and now he is in a position
> Third grade, so just go downtown to sleep.
>
> Paula Varela's murder Can Tapara
> Crime: He killed her boyfriend. Sentence: Seven years. Current
> situation: It is entered
> Palma in prison since the events occurred in September
> 1999. This week has known the sentence.
>
> We are a group of people who are organizing a Platform
> combat discrimination of men in all areas, for
> have strength we need to be many if you want to join this
> Platform for the Rights of Men Subscribe to the list
> mail you'll find
> http://www.eListas.net/lista/hombresdiscriminados
> do not need to input any personal data, only the address
> mail you want to subscribe.
> This list is the meeting point which results in the future association.
> Par more information: deliriu...@my-deja.com
>
>
> UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) v. ) ) ) Cr. No. 09-10304-MLW
> DIEGO MASMARQUES, Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WOLF, D.J.
> September 22, 2015 Defendant Diego MasMarques has filed a Motion to
> Seal, asking the court to seal the record of this case on the PACER
> system and to remove the record from the Federal Bureau of
> Investigation's ("FBI") National Criminal Information Center ("NCIC")
> database (the "Motion"). The Motion is being denied for the reasons
> explained below. I. BACKGROUND On July 17, 2000, MasMarques, who is an
> American citizen, was convicted of two counts of burglary and one count
> of willful homicide in Spain. The Spanish court sentenced him to one
> year in prison on the first burglary count, two years in prison on the
> second burglary count, and twelve years in prison on the homicide count.
> In 2005, pursuant to a Transfer Treaty, he was transferred to the
> United States to serve the remainder of his sentence. Prior to his
> transfer to the United States, MasMarques signed a form consenting to
> serve the remainder of his sentence Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7
> Filed 09/22/15 Page 1 of 7
> 2 according to the laws of the United States. By signing the form, he
> agreed that his "conviction or sentence can only be modified or set
> aside through appropriate proceedings brought by me or on my behalf in
> Spain." See Feb. 13, 2006 Verification of Consent to Transfer (Docket
> No. 1-4). MasMarques's case was initially assigned to the Eastern
> District of Wisconsin for performance of the verification proceedings
> required by 18 U.S.C. §4108. On August 20, 2008, MasMarques was
> released to a three-year term of supervised release in the Southern
> District of New York. On June 2, 2009, with the permission of the
> Probation Office, MasMarques moved to Woburn, Massachusetts. As a
> result, his case was transferred to this court for supervision during
> the remainder of his period of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C.
> §4106A(b)(3). On January 18, 2013, MasMarques, acting pro se, filed a
> motion requesting that the court seal the record of his conviction in
> Spain. In addition, he requests that the court remove a negative
> "alert" that appears in the FBI's NCIC database. He claims that the
> availability of his criminal record has harmed his ability to find a
> job. He maintains that allowing this criminal record to be publicly
> accessible violates his rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause. Case
> 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 2 of 7
> 3 II. DISCUSSION MasMarques's Motion to Seal presents four issues:
> (1) whether public availability of his criminal record constitutes a
> second punishment in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the
> Fifth Amendment; (2) whether the court should seal the record of his
> conviction; (3) whether the court has authority to order the removal of
> the negative "alert" based on his case that appears in the FBI's NCIC
> database; and (4) whether the court has authority to expunge
> MasMarques's criminal record. MasMarques is proceeding pro se.
> Therefore, his motion will be construed liberally. See Erickson v.
> Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). Nevertheless, there is no legal
> basis to grant the relief that he requests. Therefore, his Motion is
> being denied. A. Double Jeopardy The Double Jeopardy Clause
> "safeguards an individual against (1) a second prosecution for the same
> offense, following an acquittal; (2) a second prosecution for the same
> offense, following a conviction; and (3) multiple punishments for the
> same offense." United States v. Stoller, 78 F.3d 710, 714 (1st Cir.
> 1996) (quoting United States v. Rivera-Martinez, 931 F.3d 148, 152 (1st
> Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 862 (1991)). "The Clause protects only
> against the imposition of multiple criminal punishments for the same
> offense . . . and then only when such Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document
> 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 3 of 7
> 4 occurs in successive proceedings." Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S.
> 93, 99 (1997) (emphasis in original). In determining whether a
> government action is "punishment" for purposes of the Double Jeopardy
> Clause, courts examine the totality of the circumstances to determine
> whether its objectives or effects are "punitive" in nature. See
> Stoller, 78 F.3d at 721. The public availability of the records of
> MasMarques's conviction under the PACER, CORI, and NCIS system is not
> a "punishment" in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. Many courts
> have recognized that "[t]he dissemination of accurate public record
> information concerning an individual's past criminal activities holds
> "the potential for substantial negative consequences." E.B. v.
> Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1099 (3d Cir. 1997). "Nevertheless, our laws'
> insistence that information regarding criminal proceedings be publicly
> disseminated is not intended as punishment and has never been regarded
> as such." Id. at 1100. The purpose of these systems is "regulatory,"
> and they, therefore, are "not punishment even though it may bear
> harshly on one affected." Doe v. Pataki, 120 F.3d 1263, 1279 (2d Cir.
> 1997) (quoting Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 613 (1960).
> Furthermore, the negative effects of publicly disseminating criminal
> records do not "implicate any interest of fundamental constitutional
> magnitude." See Verniero, 119 F.3d at 1103. Therefore, the
> availability of the Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15
> Page 4 of 7
> 5 PACER records, the NCIC alerts, and the resulting negative effects
> do not constitute a second punishment in violation of the Double
> Jeopardy Clause. B. Sealing MasMarques's Court Records In the United
> States, there is a common law presumption of public access to judicial
> records. See Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978);
> United States v. Kravetz, 706 F.3d 47, 62 (1st Cir. 2013). This
> presumption "stems from the premise that public monitoring of the
> judicial system fosters the important values of 'quality, honesty and
> respect for our legal system.'" Siedle v. Putnam Investments, Inc.,
> 147 F.3d 7, 9-10 (1st Cir. 1998). Furthermore, Congress has recognized
> a "compelling public need" to keep criminal records publicly available.
> United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536, 539 (2d Cir. 1977). When
> evaluating a motion to seal a court record, the court "carefully
> balances the competing interests that are at stake in the particular
> case." Siedle, 147 F.3d at 10. MasMarques contends that it is unfair
> to allow the record of his case to be publicly accessible through the
> court's PACER system because public availability of the record has
> made it difficult for him to find a job . If courts were to allow the
> stigma resulting from the public record of a case to outweigh the
> public right of access, then virtually all criminal records Case
> 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 5 of 7
> 6 would be sealed. The balance might lean more in MasMarques's favor
> if he had been acquitted or exonerated of the charges in Spain. See
> Diamond v. United States, 649 F.2d 496, 499 (7th Cir. 1981).
> However, the presumptive public right of access to court records is not
> outweighed solely because the record has an adverse effect on the
> defendant's livelihood, as such rule would vitiate the presumptive
> public right of access. Indeed, "courts must be reluctant to
> substitute their judgment for that of employers, legislators, and others
> in whom the discretion to give second chances is more properly vested."
> United States v. Barrow, 06-Cr-1086(JFK), 2014 WL 2011689, at *2.
> Consequently, the court is denying MasMarques's request to seal the
> record of this case. C. Removing the "Alert" from the NCIC Database
> 28 U.S.C. §534 directs the Attorney General to maintain a criminal
> records database. MasMarques complains that his criminal record is
> accessible in this database. However, courts are without authority to
> order removal of a criminal record from the NCIC database. See Carter
> v. United States, 431 Fed. Appx. 104, 105-06 (3d Cir. 2011); United
> States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 875 (6th Cir. 2010). Therefore, the
> court must deny MasMarques's request. Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW
> Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 6 of 7
> 7 D. Expunging MasMarques's Criminal Record MasMarques also appears
> to request that the cou rt expunge the American court records of his
> convictions in Spain. However, federal courts lack subject matter
> jurisdiction to expunge criminal records based solely on "equitable
> reasons," meaning "grounds that rely only on notions of fairness and are
> entirely divorced from legal considerations." United States v. Coloian,
> 480 F.3d 47, 52 (1st Cir. 2009). MasMarques provides no legal basis to
> expunge his record. The court does not have jurisdiction to expunge his
> record on these grounds. See id. III. ORDER In view of the foregoing,
> it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Seal (Docket No. 4) is
> DENIED. /s/ Mark L. Wolf UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
lola crum
Mar 24, 2022, 3:54:20 PM3/24/22
to
0 new messages