HEBER - THE SAGA CONTINUES
naki...@my-deja.com
Cripto Anonymous Remailer <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
> Blah, Blah, Blah....
>
> Words can't express how happy I feel for you Heber. Even some of your
> critics have sided with you and are now bashing me. What will I do?
Try to Wrote Carefully!!!
>
> It seems that the critics here are pure in their critique technology
> and find only fault in those who can't follow the precise posting
> technology laid out here. I must have missed that ARS PL "Keep
> postings pure". My anger and my tone seems to be above the pleasant
> name calling of Scn'ists here and doesn't fall into the above PL,
> names like $cieo's, clams, robots, trolls, cult and more seem
> acceptable here, so let me rephase my name calling of you Heber, YOU
> DIRTY CALM! YOU BUGGAR, STOP BEING A POO FACE! That should please the
> critical masses.
You Dirty Clam!, You Buglar, stop being a bt face!
>
> And btw, I don't need "your help" critics, you need mine. Lets get
> that sorted out here. You want to take them down, right? Then you need
> more people on your side, then theirs. Am I correct? Of course I am.
> So lets stop the bullshit of picking apart my post and my name calling
> selection and lets get to the task at hand.
>
> Heber, The Pres (whom btw, I never voted for) skipped bail. He left
> several defendants with no financial or "church" support, in a case
> that will see many peoples lives ruined. He organized and ordered the
> actions the defendants took. He costs the membership 1.1 million
> dollars in "donations" by skipping bail. He is now trying to
> manipulate the US gov. by having them stop his extradition to Spain.
> He did not and will not do the same for the other defendants. He's
> guilty, he knows it, he will fry and I will be standing by with my
> marshmellos.
>
> To the critics: I'm on your side, so fuck off with the Troll
> assumtions. Your paranoia will get the best of you, if you can't see
> where I'm coming from. Here is a taste of what I know:
>
> I have plenty of shit on OSA. I have knowledge of security checking
> (confessionals) ordered by OSA on Scn staff/public, to get "evidence"
> against them. The "confessionals" are coordinated with the local
> police. Since the police don't have enough "evidence" on the
> "suspect", they work with OSA on getting some. (Did you think the deal
> Scn cut with the FBI on "performing psych raids" didn't have a price?
> Think again!) The session questions are written in such a way, that
> the person hangs himself. THOUGHTS can be written up and "mistaken"
> for ACTIONS, thereby making the person, in the eyes of the law, guilty
> of ACTION. Once the "evidence" is spit out in the "safety" of a
> session, the PC folders are then turned over, in their entirety, to
> the local police for prosecution. If the police don't have enough
> "evidence" on you bad Scientologists, OSA is there to help! Now, did
> you think I was talking about the 70's or even the 80's... think
> again! I'm talking circa 1995.
what about RPF????
>
> Would I tell you this, if I was a troll? Think not.
>
> PRIEST PENITENT PRIVILEGE - ANOTHER SCN LIE!
>
>
ENTERNITY IS NOT FOREVER!!!
--
regards
Naki
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/