Yes, I did read about many-to-many relationships before posting. And
you're right, 2 qualifies as "many".
However, like I described, this is a special case of many-to-many. As
far as DB design goes, there is no need for a relation table between
games and players because there are 2 and only 2 players per game.
It's natural to keep 2 foreign keys in the games table instead. I can
of course add a relation table, but it would be a complication needed
only to satisfy a (supposed?) ErlyDB requirement.
I read the official docs and they seem to imply this is not supported,
so (since I am new to ErlyDB) I was asking if I can keep my current DB
structure (which is the most natural) and still capture its relations
in ErlyDB.
Thanks again.
On May 10, 11:11 pm, Alexander Dergachev <
cy6erbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I`m sorry, but don`t you think that 2-to-many it`s the same as many-to-many?
> :)
>
> So, did you have a look at this page?
http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2006/08/30/many-to-many-relations-are-...