Packaging Discussion at erlware-questions

[Eric B Merritt]

Guys,

There is an on going and very interesting discussion going on on the
erlware-questions list that you guys may be interested. Christophe at
the very least I think you should review the threads and probably
participate. It looks like we may actually have enough momentum to
produce something and I think we are actually going in the right
direction as well. I am throwing this out as a heads up to you guys.

I will be sending out a summary of the discussion later on this
afternoon.

Eric

[Christophe Romain]

Hello

I followed the thread with some delay.
there are indeed interesting stuffs, but i did not get enough time to
participate.
CEAN-2.0 covers parts of what is said, and can be extented/improved the
way you mention in the thread, this looks to me this is going to the
right direction as well.
But people do not use CEAN-2.0(see http://cean.process-one.net/stats/).
Anyway i use it daily and am happy with the flexibles features it provides.

Unfortunately, this is not good schedule for me at the moment, i can not
give time on this by now.

[Tristan Sloughter]

A problem I have with CEAN is its documentation and webpage is very confusing. 

There seems to be no link to a source repo, like on github. It is hard to tell what is CEAN2 and what is CEAN1 since there are things like links to slides from 2006 http://www.process-one.net/images/uploads/EUC06-CEAN.pdf

Oddly enough, I think it would go a long way if they simply had a CEAN github repo that people could see was actively being worked on and had a simple README for how to use it.

Tristan

[Christophe Romain]

>A problem I have with CEAN is its documentation and webpage is very
>confusing.

understand, will try to improve the situation then.

CEAN on github: https://github.com/cromain/cean