Re: A Bandwidth Manager For ISA 2006 Firewall : Bandwidth Splitter

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Ingelore Clason

unread,
Jul 16, 2024, 3:35:41 PM7/16/24
to erexprefun

You can do this using ALTQ, to some extent. What you can do using ALTQ is lower the bandwidth of a specific pipe after a specific time, when using HFSC. Whether this actually accomplishes what you need depends largely on the protocol.

A Bandwidth Manager for ISA 2006 Firewall : Bandwidth Splitter


Download ::: https://picfs.com/2yXCcG



In depth information on PF and HFSC is available here and you'll be looking at option 7 for your implementation. It does not "lower priority after a while", but "grants more bandwidth initially". This can have the same desired end result.

They simply take all traffic coming from 192.168.1.0, run it through Queue 1.
Queue 1 is associated with Schedule 1
Schedule 1 is using FWQ+ to distribute bandwidth (when there isn't enough available) based on least usage gets highest priority. Flows are grouped by source IP address (I'm assuming you want all the traffic from a particular IP treated the same).
The Schedule is constrained by the Pipe, which tells it that it's got 300Kbps to work with (otherwise it would assume it has the whole speed of the Ethernet interface, which your Internet connection probably isn't that fast). You would change the 300Kbps to whatever your actual connection is.

Limiters are an alternate method of traffic shaping. Limiters use dummynet(4)to enact bandwidth limits and perform other prioritization tasks, and they donot rely on ALTQ. Limiters are currently the only way to achieve per-IP addressor per-network bandwidth rate limiting using pfSense software. Limiters arealso used internally by Captive Portal for per-user bandwidth limits.

Like HFSC and CBQ, Limiters may be nested with queues inside other queues.Root-level limiters (Also called Pipes), may have bandwidth limits and delays,while child limiters (Also called queues), may have priorities (Also calledweights). Bandwidth limits can be optionally masked by either the source ordestination IP address, so that the limits can be applied on a per-IP address ornetwork basis instead of as a general group.

Conceptually, consider a limiter as a bucket of bandwidth. All traffic flowingthrough an unmasked limiter draws bandwidth from the same bucket. Masking alimiter effectively sets up multiple buckets of the same size, one per maskedgroup. Whether that is a single host or an entire network depends on the maskvalue.

Limiters can also allow for reserved bandwidth by limiting everything except aspecific protocol which can then consume all remaining bandwidth. In this typeof setup on a 10Mbit/s link the firewall would pass traffic from, for example, aSIP server with no limiter. Then the firewall would use a pass rule for allother traffic with a limit of 8Mbit/s. This would let the SIP server use all ofthe bandwidth it wanted, but it would always have a minimum of 2Mbit/s toitself.

In situations where packets are queued under the same parent pipe, the firewallconsiders their weights when ordering the packets before it sends them. Unlikepriorities in CBQ and PRIQ, the weight of a queue in a limiter will never starveit for bandwidth.

If the firewall has schedules defined (Time Based Rules),the firewall offers them in this list. When schedules are in use by thefirewall, the limiter can have a bandwidth value for each potentialschedule. Define these by clicking Add Schedule to add anotherbandwidth definition.

When a limiter is set for Source Address or Destination Address, thepipe bandwidth limit will be applied on a per-IP address basis or a subnetbasis, depending on the masking bits, using the direction chosen in themasking.

The Weight option is only found on child limiters (queues). This valuecan range from 1 to 100. Higher values give more precedence to packets in agiven queue. Unlike PRIQ and CBQ priorities, a lowly-weighted queue is notin danger of being starved of bandwidth by the firewall.

The set bandwidth and parameters for each limiter are displayed by the page,along with the current traffic level moving inside the limiter. In the case ofmasked limiters, the firewall displays the bandwidth of each IP address ormasked group.

A good example of this system behavior is your WSUS server retrieving updates and patches. These updates are important but you would not want them to impact users internet speed during office hours. You may also occasionally have the requirement to limit certain user's internet speed so that their online behavior doesn't impact others. Below is a user report showing the bandwidth peak usage.

Since the data caps and available bandwidth is not visible to the user during normal usage it is a little trick to test the effectiveness of your rules. To test the configuration yourself, set a low quota so that you can easily hit the soft cap. You can watch the usage graphs in the bandwidth manager console but a more graphic way of doing is as follows:

I need to monitor bandwidth usage on my network per device and be able to either limit the internet speed for any device based on IP or MAC address and also specify bandwidth quota for the device for the period of a month.

You should configure the bandwidth control on the gateway between the internal network and Internet if you want to restrict the bandwidth of Internet access only. If you have the ISA server as the gateway, there are some 3rd party plug-ins (Bandwidth Splitter, Traffic Quota, Netfee).

PRTG runs on a Windows server and doesn't require SQL and can capture flow or packet sniffing data for aggregate bandwidth monitoring and/or utilization at each interface. You may be able to do it with our 100 sensor (what is a sensor? Opens a new window) freeware offering.

There are not much PCs, only 50. But the problem is the personal wireless smart devices! At least 200 personal devices. The bandwidth is 24Mbps with a limit of 1TB per month. Taking into account that the 50 PCs mainly use the cloud in the operations (Mass media company) not the local server, the 1TB barely suffice, and it is really irritating to suffer the low bandwidth and extend the 1TB each month because of irresponsible employees!

I have 1 router and about 12 APs, so I thought I could just handle all of this through the server without the need of upgrading those APs. Plus, upgrading the server could fulfill other needs of the business, while upgrading the APs will only solve the bandwidth/quota problem.

When a particular IP address uses too many resources, you can prevent that IP from consuming your bandwidth indiscriminately. In this recipe, you learn how to use Traffic Shaping on your FortiGate to limit the bandwidth for a specific IP address.

Enter a name: limited_bandwidth. Set Type to IP/Netmask. Set the Subnet/IP Range to the internal IP address you wish to limit. In this example, 192.168.10.10/32. Set Interface to Any.

Enter the name limited_bandwidth for your shaper and set the Traffic Priority to Medium. Setting a Traffic Priority will only have an impact if you have enabled Traffic Shaping in ALL your other Internet access policies using the same two interfaces. There must also be some variation, for example you will not see any differences while all policies are set to the default setting (High).

By default, shared shapers apply shaping by evenly distributing the bandwidth to all policies using it. You can also enable Per Policy shaping to apply shaping individually to each policy. Right-click your new limited_bandwidth shaper, and select Edit in CLI from the drop down menu.

Now that Per Policy shaping is enabled, edit your limited_bandwidth shaper and set Apply Shaper to Per Policy. Now, each security policy using this shaper will have the same distribution of bandwidth, regardless of the number of policies using the shaper. In this example, 200 kb/s (0.2 Mbps) each.

Under Matching Criteria, set Source to limited_bandwidth. Set Destination and Service to ALL. Apply the shaper to the same Outgoing Interface. Enable Shared Shaper and Reverse Shaper and set both shapers to limited_bandwidth.

Order your traffic shaping policies so that your more granular limited_bandwidth policy is above your general high-priority Internet access policy. Click on the far left column of the policy and move it up or down to change the sequence order.

The IP address you have specified will receive limited-bandwidth treatment and may experience dropped bytes. Your limited-bandwidth shaper should not exceed 200kbps. Note that the results show the Bytes (Sent/Received) in Megabytes (MB) and the Bandwidth in kilobits per second (kbps).

aa06259810
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages