Download Pool Rewards
Miina Hyrkas
Participation is open to solo drivers who begin carpooling during peak rush hour periods in the Metropolitan Washington Statistical Area*. Commuters who currently drive alone to work may be eligible for financial rewards when they agree to start or join a new carpool!
A. Get a group of commuters together to start or join a new vanpool. Commuter Connections or the participating vanpool companies below can assist with searching for vanpool partners.
Many companies provide vanpooling employees with a subsidy of up to $280 each month or the ability to enjoy up to $280 in monthly vanpool expenses on a pre-tax basis. Ask your Human Resources department.
I moved some some funds from Ledger to a new wallet. Then, back to a new Ledger account. The network should not know that both owner stake addresses as well as the pool reward address are all secured by the same HW wallet.
It is by design that owner(s) and operator should have sufficient trust between them to run a pool. Otherwise, if owner rewards were paid directly into their account, there would be a market place for pledge providers.
collaborating to form a stake pool should require significant trust between the owners. Otherwise, everyone could choose to become a co-owner of a stake pool instead of delegating, which would render the mechanism of pledging stake ineffective.
The rewards that a stake pool gets depend on a pledge of funds that the stake pool owner(s) provide. This adds a cost to creating a competitive stake pool, and protects against Sybil attacks on the stake pool level
Hello guys, I've been providing liquidity to a pool for a couple days now, but I've been wondering how much am I actually making from it, not from the APR from locking our LP tokens, but from the fees, so I'm making this post for anyone to help me understand how I can calculate it. This is my take on it with an example, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong!
Example:
A: Lets assume you delegated during epoch 200. Untill the end of that epoch nothing will happen.
In epoch 201 your stake is included in the current snapshot.
In epoch 202 your stake may will produce blocks.
In epoch 203, your rewards are calculated and paid out at the end of that epoch. The rewards will also be included in the next snapshot and thus be staked.
Hi there, on a first delegation to a new pool, rewards come on the 5th epoch after the stake is made. It becomes active as a stake on the third epoch after stake, then if the pool makes a block on 3rd epoch, the fourth epoch calculates the rewards and the fifth distributes them.
Are you asking if you change to 10 pools in the same epoch you think you should earn from the whole 10 pools? But your ADA is only in those 10 pools for a moment during that one epoch. That is like putting your eggs all in one basket and then changing it to 10 different baskets one after the other and guess what eggs get broken and you pay the entry fees 10 times regardless.
The reward pool is a pool found in the Ruins of Unkah, just outside the bank. After subduing Tempoross, players can fish with a big or small fishing net near the dock to get their rewards, granting 10 Fishing experience per reward. Attempting to fish from the reward pool without a net will cause the nearby Spirit Angler to offer a free small fishing net.
Fishing from the pool requires reward permits, which are obtained from subduing Tempoross. Players need to earn at least 2,000 points during a successful encounter to receive reward permits, starting at 1 and adding 1 per 700 point threshold (with a chance at rounding up). The reward pool's appearance changes as more reward permits are stored, and up to 8,000 reward rolls can be stored. The pool rewards are unaffected by skill boosts; e.g. it is not possible to catch manta rays if the player's base Fishing level is below 81. The rewards are determined by the player's Fishing level at the time of collection from the reward pool, not at the time of adding permits.
2.) I noticed the owner accounts DO NOT have their delegation rewards automatically put into their associated payment addresses. This appears to be by design. Am I to assume that the reward operator is therefore responsible for, the 340ada epoch reward, the 50% margin fee from delegators AND the normal delegation rewards that the owners might have. For example I made one of the owners have 10000 ADA but it has not received any delegation rewards. I have to conclude that this was sent to the reward address?
3.)If the reward address does indeed get ALL rewards, then what is the best way to calculate what to pay out to the owners then? Should I instead put the minimum amount for a pledge in the owner account and instead have me and my friend delegate separately? My thinking here is the delegation portion of the reward would be automatically calculated this way. The only issue then is the 50% margin would have to be accounted for to make for a fair payout, since the operator reward account would get the 50% margin now from the delegation of the 10,000 ada lets say. Which should technically be paid out to my friend and me as we are both owners.
2.) Create 2 separate addresses to hold the bulk of the ADA and then have them delegate to the pool. I am then going to write a script to calculate how many epochs won at least 1 block since the last time a payout occurred and return back the 50% margin that was taken to return back to the owners.
You need to reach an agreement between the owners on however you want to divvy up the rewards. For example if one owner provides 2/3 of the pledge then maybe it is fair that she gets 2/3 of the rewards. But maybe if the owner that supplied only 1/3 of the pledge is doing all the work of running the pool then maybe that person should get most of the rewards. The agreement is up to the owners.
The advantage of having multiple owner accounts is that separate owners can maintain control over their pledged Ada and can therefore withdraw it if there is a disagreement about the running of the pool. But they need to trust each other to properly divvy up the rewards from the reward account. Presumably the owners know each other, and where they live, so they can institute legal action in the real world if the rewards are not split up in accordance with their agreement. The system has been designed this way because really the running of a pool is supposed to be by one entity. This single entity can still be a group of people but the individuals should know each other in the real world because the protocol is not going to sort out any disputes between owners.
Yes. That is my understanding. If you think about how the reward formula and pledge mechanism needs to work, then I think this makes sense. For example, imagine this scenario: Say your pool sets a pledge value of 100K Ada and one owner wallet has 50K and the other owner wallet has 150K. The pledged amount is met because the total of the owner wallets is 200K which is greater than the 100K value set in the pool certificate. But if the protocol was to pay only the value up to the pledge amount into the reward account, and the rest into the owner accounts, then how would it apportion the rewards on the extra 100K delegated by the owners? Also, the protocol knows nothing about the agreement between the different owners in terms of how they intended to run the pool and which owners were incurring which expenses. Thus, it makes sense to simply pay the total owner rewards into the one reward account and then let the owners sort out how they wanted to divvy up the rewards between themselves.
Furthermore it would be extra complexity if each wallet staking key could be associated with more than one reward address because you would need some extra mechanism to tell the protocol how you wanted rewards split between the different reward addresses.
The problem is, last time I moved to solo, I did not win anything for 15 days.
I do understand that I missed out on 15 days of rewards (0.2 approx x15=3) but even if I was on the pool for those 15 days I would still have 5 xch less in total, and If I won a block or two, difference would be even bigger.
I do not blame the pool and do not suspect them withholding any profits. Quite the opposite: the pool helped me quickly identify stales and I successfully used it as a diagnostic tool to optimize the rig.
For my small farm (100 tib) it is not the case yet. I have found 1 Block so far but payed out 2.5 xch.
It might be what was said before with unoptimized rigs. Who knows. For me, If I would see this amount of profit loss, I would go solo. Especially if I win Blocks more or less consistently with a big farm. I have seen many farms drop out of the leaderboard at around 20 Pib for space pool. My best guess is that these are switching over to solo farming. Probably it makes sense to switch to solo from roughly 1 pib?
Maybe it would also make sense to have most plots solo farming and have some pool plots in between to debug with the pool (see if disks are offline or even the entira rig)
Say, a user wants to swap token A for token B on an AMM-based DEX. So, the user goes to the DEX's A-B liquidity pool, deposits the amount of A they want to swap and receives in exchange an amount of B determined by the smart contract.
Users who deposit their crypto to pools are called liquidity providers (LP), and rewards paid to them are referred to as LP fees or LP rewards. LPs have to deposit an equal amount of both of the pool's tokens.
A user's yield from providing tokens to a liquidity pool varies significantly, depending on the protocol, the specific pool, the deposited coins and overall market conditions. Some pools boast high rates of rewards, but they can also have more volatility and present more risk.
df19127ead