Please find below the links to the questionnaire in the different languages in which it was asked. Please always follow the source questionnaire in English available in the Downloads section above for for the overview and reading aid, instructions, routing and other details.
The studies reviewed in this section were found as a result of our SMS (Mohanani et al. 2018). Most work on cognitive biases in the context of software quality and testing is focused on confirmation bias (Mohanani et al. 2018; Salman 2016). Another term related to confirmation bias is positive test bias or positive test strategy, found in the works of Teasley et al. (1994) and Leventhal et al. (1994). Leventhal et al. (1994) refer to the work of Klayman and Ha (1989) and mention that the phenomenon of positive test bias is also called confirmation bias. According to the definition of confirmation bias, the more the bias exists among the testers the more it negatively affects the testing (Calikli and Bener 2013, 2014; Leventhal et al.1994).
This section focuses on the factor of time pressure from two perspectives. First, we present the SE studies that have considered time pressure in different SE contexts. Then, we shift the focus to the psychology studies discipline that motivate our study.
This section elaborates on confirmation bias as a psychological phenomenon and on how psychology literature has operationalised time pressure to study its influence on confirmatory and motivational behaviours. The studies in this section report time pressure as a factor that negatively impacted the process/quality by influencing the manifestation of confirmation bias in the studied contexts. Of particular importance to our work, Ask and Granhag (2007) reported that the tendency of people to rely on prior beliefs rather than on external information increased under time pressure. Hence, we aim to take an interdisciplinary perspective.
In this section, we present the details of our experiment from the perspective of definition and planning - the first two stages of the experiment process (Wohlin et al. 2000). To enable further replications, we share the experimental protocol and scripts at:
In this section, we first describe how we executed the experiment and then elaborate on the data collection steps. Figure 2 presents the flow of the events related to our experimental execution. It visualises the pre-experimental activities, experimental sessions and post-experimental activities. Figure 2 also shows which activities were executed in parallel, e.g. training was conducted in parallel to the pre-experimental activities.
All shops featured on GG.deals will deliver your game immediately after the payment has been approved. This will be either in the form of direct download or PC key - depending on the store of your choice. After you activate key on a corresponding platform, you will be able to download and play your game for free. If you don't know how to activate the key, check out the tutorials section on the bottom of the page.
See Understanding Techniques for WCAG Success Criteria for important information about the usage of these informative techniques and how they relate to the normative WCAG 2.0 success criteria. The Applicability section explains the scope of the technique, and the presence of techniques for a specific technology does not imply that the technology can be used in all situations to create content that meets WCAG 2.0.
This section provides you with an overview of the terms used in this data protection declaration. Many of the termsare taken from the law and defined above all in Art. 4 GDPR. The legal definitions are binding. The followingexplanations, on the other hand, are intended primarily for understanding. The terms are sorted alphabetically.
ASP Enterprises, Inc. v. Guillory, et al., No. 2003-15838 (22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany 2008). Summary judgment granted, dismissing RICO claims against defendant-bank with prejudice; appeal pending.
United Steel Workers International Union (Local 6000) v. Albemarle Corporation, Civil Action No. H-06-3556 (S.D. Tex. 2007). Following summary judgment briefing on behalf of our defendant-employer client, plaintiff-union voluntarily dismissed with prejudice NLRA Section 301 suit to compel arbitration of retiree medical benefits.
Moss McCarty v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:04cv106-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss. 2006). Defense of suit alleging failure to promote racial discrimination, harassment and retaliation; dismissal with prejudice.
Subject to the terms of this Agreement, you may use the Image only for editorial use or as an authorized distributor or reseller. This right to use is personal to you and is not transferable by you to another party. The Image cannot be used to promote or sell any product or technology (such as on advertising, brochures, book-covers, stock photos, t-shirts, or other promotional merchandise) other than authentic Music Tribe IP Ltd. Products. You may not use the Image in any way that might prejudice the reputation of Music Tribe, or the distinctiveness, validity or goodwill of any of its brands. You may not use the Image in any way that misrepresents your relationship with Music Tribe. You may not alter, or modify the Image, in whole or in part, for any reason.
Please note that you should download and install the data updates in numeric order, starting with the update version one increment higher than your current Relibase+ 3.2 installation. To determine which update you require, view the "Relibase Diagnostics" page located in the Help section of your Relibase+ 3.2 server and locate the entry for "Update status file" and download the data update one higher than what is reported there. The following installation instructions apply for this and all other 3.2 data updates available here.
aa06259810