fxl skeleton publication

[Matt Garrish]

Hi folks,

 

I’ve just uploaded a skeleton 0200 publication where we can begin adding basic FXL tests. It doesn’t contain any real tests yet, only a couple of placeholders.

 

This publication also only sets the pre-paginated property in the package metadata, but we’ll be creating additional publications to test more advanced layout options in the future.

 

Matt

[Vincent Gros]

Hi Matt,

Some of the itemref in the spine has the properties attribute set to "reflowable". Because of that, I believe that 0200 is not a fully fixed-layout file.

Most of the Reading Systems cannot open such file properly (except Readium).

So, if the purpose of 0200 is to check some basic FXL tests, maybe  we should build a fully FXL content ?

2013/3/28 Matt Garrish <matt.g...@bell.net>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "epub-testsuite-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epub-testsuite-di...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[Markus Gylling]

So, if the purpose of 0200 is to check some basic FXL tests, maybe  we should build a fully FXL content ?

That sounds reasonable to me -- start with some basics, and keep the more advanced "hybrid" tests for a higher series number. 

/markus

[Ori Idan]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Markus Gylling <markus....@gmail.com> wrote:

So, if the purpose of 0200 is to check some basic FXL tests, maybe  we should build a fully FXL content ?

That sounds reasonable to me -- start with some basics, and keep the more advanced "hybrid" tests for a higher series number. 

I also think that fixed layout should be a different EPUB.

Hybrid is really advanced.

-- 

Ori Idan

[Matt Garrish]

Right, fair enough. I was trying to get away with being really lazy on the test-less initial commit, but, yes, every page should be a fixed layout...

 

From: Markus Gylling

Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:30 AM

To: epub-testsu...@googlegroups.com

Subject: Re: fxl skeleton publication

 

So, if the purpose of 0200 is to check some basic FXL tests, maybe  we should build a fully FXL content ?

 

That sounds reasonable to me -- start with some basics, and keep the more advanced "hybrid" tests for a higher series number. 

 

/markus

 

On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Vincent Gros <vgr...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Matt,

Some of the itemref in the spine has the properties attribute set to "reflowable". Because of that, I believe that 0200 is not a fully fixed-layout file.

Most of the Reading Systems cannot open such file properly (except Readium).

So, if the purpose of 0200 is to check some basic FXL tests, maybe  we should build a fully FXL content ?

2013/3/28 Matt Garrish <matt.g...@bell.net>

Hi folks,

 

I’ve just uploaded a skeleton 0200 publication where we can begin adding basic FXL tests. It doesn’t contain any real tests yet, only a couple of placeholders.

 

This publication also only sets the pre-paginated property in the package metadata, but we’ll be creating additional publications to test more advanced layout options in the future.

 

Matt

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "epub-testsuite-discuss" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mailto:epub-testsuite-discuss%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "epub-testsuite-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epub-testsuite-di...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[Matt Garrish]

Okay, I’ve undone my sins.