Pledge not to Pledge (Allegiance to the Flag)

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Rex

unread,
Nov 13, 2005, 10:58:16 AM11/13/05
to re...@ij.net
Please take the "pledge not to pledge" allegiance to the flag. Shocking
facts were exposed by the historian Rex Curry during research for court
litigation
against the Pledge of Allegiance. The new Pledge case from Elk Grove,
California (9/14/05), virtually guarantees the high court will review the
Pledge again, and this time the Court will hear the whole truth. Join
others
for the upcoming "Great American Teach-In" to tell students about their
right not to pledge.

1. The USA's first Pledge used a straight-arm salute and it was the origin
of the salute of the monstrous National Socialist German Workers' Party
(Nazis). It was not an ancient Roman salute.
http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html

2. The Pledge began with a military salute that then stretched outward
toward the flag. Historic photographs are at
http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html and at
http://rexcurry.net/pledge_military.html Due to the way that both gestures
were used, the military salute led to the Nazi salute. The Nazi salute is an
extended military salute. http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html

3. The Pledge's creator was a self-proclaimed socialist in the nationalism
movement in the USA and his dogma influenced socialists in Germany, and his
Pledge was the origin of their salute. "Nazi" means "National Socialist
German Workers' Party." A mnemonic device is the swastika (Hakenkreuz in
German). Although the swastika was an ancient symbol, it was also used
sometimes by German National Socialists to represent "S" letters for their
"socialism." Hitler altered his own signature to use the same stylized "S"
letter for "socialist."
http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-swastika.html

The Pledge is part of the USA's growing police-state. The insane government
in the U.S. could cause comatose persons to Pledge dis-allegiance, desecrate
the flag, and recite a declaration of independence. Remove the Pledge from
the flag, remove flags from schools, remove schools from government.


zinnic

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 7:11:28 PM11/14/05
to Epistemology

I would prefer that you pledge not to post imbecility on Epistemology.
Zinnic

rexcurrydotnet

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 10:55:44 PM11/14/05
to Epistemology
Thanks for not disputing any of my points. Your inartful evasion is
glaring. There is no place for you imbecilic and off-topic comments.
Please restrict yourself and discuss epistemology and give your view on
questions such as: What is science, what is knowledge and what is
logic? Are there absolute and universal rules? Is there just one
universe? How does research influence its outcome?

Souvik

unread,
Nov 15, 2005, 1:09:42 AM11/15/05
to Epistemology
Your post has nothing to do with epistemology and much to do with
political gestures. Find a group that is interested in political
gestures and post there.
-Souvik

The Answers

unread,
Nov 23, 2005, 8:17:31 AM11/23/05
to Epistemology
i know! i know! i know!
Logic is...
The study of the principles of reasoning, especially of the structure
of propositions as distinguished from their content and of method and
validity in deductive reasoning.

A system of reasoning: Aristotle's logic.
A mode of reasoning: By that logic, we should sell the company
tomorrow.
The formal, guiding principles of a discipline, school, or science.
Valid reasoning: Your paper lacks the logic to prove your thesis.
The relationship between elements and between an element and the whole
in a set of objects, individuals, principles, or events: There's a
certain logic to the motion of rush-hour traffic.
Computer Science.
The nonarithmetic operations performed by a computer, such as sorting,
comparing, and matching, that involve yes-no decisions.
Computer circuitry.
Graphic representation of computer circuitry.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Middle English, from Old French logique, from Latin logica, from Greek
logik (tekhn), (art) of reasoning, logic, feminine of logikos, of
reasoning, from logos, reason. See leg- in Indo-European Roots.]

: the branch of philosophy that analyzes inference 2: reasoned and
reasonable judgment; "it made a certain kind of logic" 3: the
principles that guide reasoning within a given field or situation;
"economic logic requires it"; "by the logic of war" 4: a system of
reasoning [syn: logical system, system of logic]

knowledge is...
The state or fact of knowing.
Familiarity, awareness, or understanding gained through experience or
study.
The sum or range of what has been perceived, discovered, or learned.
Learning; erudition: teachers of great knowledge.
Specific information about something.
Carnal knowledge

and science is...

The observation, identification, description, experimental
investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena.
Such activities restricted to a class of natural phenomena.
Such activities applied to an object of inquiry or study.
Methodological activity, discipline, or study: I've got packing a
suitcase down to a science.
An activity that appears to require study and method: the science of
purchasing.
Knowledge, especially that gained through experience.
Science Christian Science.

see now this group needn't even exist for i have delivered you all the
answers. copy and paste, then be grateful...

Sam Carana

unread,
Nov 25, 2005, 11:05:39 PM11/25/05
to episte...@googlegroups.com
I have kept silent here for a while to prove that specifically this "zinnic" person will continue to insult members here, whether I post or not. The above message should sufficiently prove this and I hereby repeat my call for zinic to be banned from this group.
 
Sam Carana

 

Sam Carana

unread,
Nov 25, 2005, 11:10:01 PM11/25/05
to episte...@googlegroups.com
We spend many posts discussing "what is epistemology" earlier this year.
I see no reason why Rex's post was out of line.
By contrast, Rex raises a good point and the replies of others are out of line.
 
Sam Carana

 

Souvik

unread,
Nov 25, 2005, 11:35:21 PM11/25/05
to Epistemology
Sam Carana wrote:
> I have kept silent here for a while to prove that specifically this "zinnic"
> person will continue to insult members here, whether I post or not. The
> above message should sufficiently prove this and I hereby repeat my call for
> zinic to be banned from this group.

You have kept silent here for a while Sam, because you were getting to
be the butt of jokes here, post for post. Not because you were a genius
far ahead of her time, but just because you are naive.

Rex's post had *nothing* to do with epistemology in any sense. Which is
probably why Zinnic said what he did. And anyway, I think Rex's post
was a pretty trifling observation -- and any number of such trifling
observations may be made to absolutely no effect.

-Souvik

Sam Carana

unread,
Nov 26, 2005, 1:38:57 AM11/26/05
to episte...@googlegroups.com
There's the proof that Souvik too needs to be banned!
 
I'll repeat what souvik said below to show that, immediately after I posted, the insults started again. The unprovoked attacks by this duo on other group members seeking to discuss issues of epistemological relevance should be stopped here and now.
 
I'll notify the owner(s) of this group of this. Anyone who likes to add comments can do the same, by posting a message here or at:
Sam
 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages