Re: [epistemology 13353] Digest for epistemology@googlegroups.com - 1 update in 1 topic

[Michael Atovigba]

Great education! Atovigba.

On 11/17/15, episte...@googlegroups.com
<episte...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> =============================================================================
> Today's topic summary
> =============================================================================
>
> Group: episte...@googlegroups.com
> Url:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email#!forum/epistemology/topics
>
>
> - The Universe: two scenarios. /by Israel Socratus/ [1 Update]
> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/595c4e92afe81748
>
>
> =============================================================================
> Topic: The Universe: two scenarios. /by Israel Socratus/
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/595c4e92afe81748
> =============================================================================
>
> ---------- 1 of 1 ----------
> From: Sadovnik Socratus <i.soc...@yahoo.com>
> Date: Nov 16 10:32PM -0800
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/b1e618a896e56
>
> The Universe: two scenarios. /by Israel Socratus/
>
> ===…
>
> Scenario number one: Big Bang.
>
> At t=0 moment of BB:
>
> a) the temperature was infinite (go to infinite)
>
> b) the density was infinite. (go to infinite)
>
> c) the volume was zero (go to zero)
>
> d) BB reached a boundary to spacetime itself.
>
> e) here the laws of physics break down.
>
> f) today BB is prestige cosmological scenario.
>
> #
>
> Scenario number two: Zero Vacuum.
>
> a) the temperature is T=0K (the boundary of heat)
>
> b) the density is infinite (we cannot reach T=0K and its density).
>
> c) the volume is infinite but the volume of its quantum particles
>
> are zero (according to Jacques Charles’ law
>
> (and the consequence of the third law of thermodynamics )
>
> d) zero vacuum is the boundary to gravity-space and gravity-time.
>
> e) here the laws of physics (Ideal gas, QED, SRT, . . etc.) are worked.(!)
>
> f) today scientific community obeys taboo:
>
> no explanation beyond zero vacuum point. . . . . . .
>
> . . . ‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we
> cannot
>
> reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
>
> sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
>
> simple have no meaning.’
>
> Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ , Page 138.
>
> by Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
>
> #
>
> Question: Does zero vacuum really have no meaning?
>
> My opinion.
>
> The T=0K is boundary between two (2) worlds: Material and Vacuum.
>
> Beyond/below T=0K is Kingdom of negative virtual antiparticles: -E=Mc^2.
>
> The symmetrical continuum of T=0K ( in its local places) can be broken by
>
> antiparticles through entropy, HUP, quantum fluctuation, quantum tunneling,
>
> ==========…
>
> Best wishes.
>
> Israel Sadovnik.
>
> =======.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this
> group. You can change your settings on the group membership page:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email#!forum/epistemology/join
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an
> email to epistemology...@googlegroups.com.
>
>