"The Death's Idea IS ROUTED by Epistemology! Definitively!"... in Amodeo's result.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

amoram

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 11:59:30 AM7/3/08
to Epistemology

Romano Amodeo affirms: "When I use the Dynamic Law's Third fundamental
principle " I am able to SHOW WHY the death is not the real end of my
human spirit... since I'm already returned from my death-point, how
I'd be "resurrected one"...
This Third fundamental principle of the Dynamic Law (known how action
and reaction), states that every action is visible "always and only"
through the equal and contrary action.
So I, no more considering Other's authority, but only that of this
Dynamic Principle, can affirm that also my spiritual action, (that of
my real spiritual "observation",) is visible "always and only" through
the equal and contrary material action...
Through the material action of my body (directed towards the corporal
death) I have the true proof of my (true but invisible) spiritual
action: my really already happened return from the erroneously-
believed "mortal point".
I'm now "how a resurrected soul" because my spirit did not advance any
more with my body, when this had no more the necessary valid circuits
to permit again the electric flux of the spiritual existence in that
direction of the time. Therefore - how if this interruption was a
perfect mirror - the electric Spirit, being an immortal energy, was
reflected, was compelled to assume the magnetic form that advances
properly returning, how the same antimatter does... and the new
corporal form was made by antimatter.
All this flux (electrically going up as a / and magnetically going
down as a \) is continuous and perpetual one how all this complex /
\ ... But our intelligence is making in the "t" time only the punctual
instantaneous analysis of this complex /\. At present we analyze only
the two terminal points at the base of this /\ and we perceive this
punctual complexity how our electro-magnetism. Through the progression
of our temporal analysis, this /\ will appear always more short, till
it becomes the high "inversion point" (the "death point" of the
separation between the Analytic electric Spirit of the Observer, and
the body... that cannot more permit that electric advancement).
The future of the same "analysis" is a /\ always more high, and - on
the base of the advancing electrical life - we'll advance magnetically
and with antimatter body in the past time of the same "constructive"
life of now, perceiving the inverse "destructive" dynamic, with all
the actions returning in their causes, always more remote and
fundamental ones. Entered again in the maternal uterus, afterwards
we'll be connected to our 2 parents, 4 grandfathers, 8, 16, 32... ALL
the "HOLY FATHER" living in the high heaven, having finally the common
perception of all the potential life existent in the only Adam.
Are you thinking "Why?"
Romano Amodeo's Epistemology responds in this way: In the Third
Dynamic Principle, between ACTION and REACTION there is simultaneity,
while we perceive the Action how an invisible CAUSE, and the Reaction
as the only visible EFFECT, so we, acting this selection, postpone the
Effect to their Cause, and introduce a "discrimination". Since all the
life is all a sequence of CAUSE and EFFECT, from the birth "Alfa" to
the death "Omega", we perceive "A" before "O" in arbitrary way, going
against the Justice and creating a "imbalance", how the "up" of a
wave, that - balancing - gets the "down" how sequence.
Since the "trains" in the time are truly 2, because the magnetism and
antimatter "train" goes in back direction to push in the advancing the
electricity and natter "train"... the "train" that can realize the
"balance" of the precedent "imbalance", through the contrary
"imbalance" REALLY EXISTS. So THE REASON of the "balance", how the
sequence of 2 contrary "imbalances", will impose with ABSOLUTE FORCE,
the loading on the "train" going in the "past time" direction.
Past, present and future time exist - in time's shape - only because
they are induced through our unjust "discrimination".
Always the Epistemology gives the TRUE PROOF of the OMNI-PRESENCE of
all the Universe how simultaneous.
It is JUST that ABSOLUTE SPEED that is the PRESENCE of the 1.000
unitary masses contained in 1 m^3, in 1 second. 1.000/1 is 1 m^2 equal
to 10^3 masses, so the base 10 of 10^3 is of 10 dm = 1 m. In this
reasoning (and it is Philosophy of Science), in metres, we have the
1.000/1 expressed in masses how 1×1×1/1 expressed in metres. Since
1×1×1/1 is the product xyz/t we can present the product xyz also how
the length 1+1+1 of the 3 parameters, and in this form we don't have
more the ratio mass/time, but space-in-line/time... at the ABSOLUTE
SPEED of the mass 1000/1.
When we take the Earth mass, the line representative of the Earth mass
is a line long 30.000.000 metres, how 30.000.000 m^3 put in sequence
and containing 10^3 masses each one. These 10^3 are the CAUSE of
3×10^7 dimension, because the ABSOLUTE REFERENCE is 10^10, and this
ABSOLUTE, divided by the Relative 10^3 masses(of 1 m^3), gets 10^7
their Relative number.
So we have this ABSOLUTE PRESENCE of 30.000.000 metres containing
3×10^10 masses, or 30.000.000.000. We necessarily must have the flow's
section! Nothing advances in the section 0! Where the cycle of 10
masses is the unit of 1 m, also the section MUST have the cycle 10,
and MUST BE 10^2. Therefore 30.000.000.000 masses, divided by 100
masses present in the electromagnetic area 10^2, gets the ABSOLUTE
SPEED of 300.000.000 masses expressed "in metres", being the metre
equal to 10 masses, and being 30.000.000 m^3 = 30.000.000 metres in
line 1/10 of 300.000.000.
Now the Philosophy loves the Truth, and the Epistemology the Science's
one. In this way is REALLY LOVED the science: searching scientifically
its Truth.
In our case, the TRUTH is that 300.000.000 metres in line MEANS the
PRESENCE of 30.000.000 m^3 if unitary masses every second of time
duration. After 1 second this PRESENCE goes in the Past-time, and it
is substituted by ANOTHER PRESENCE that is not the first "changed" in
force of the "becoming"... but another one! From the ACTION we pass to
the REACTION and are always 2! It is not the CAUSE that "becomes" the
EFFECT! We, simply, pass from one to the other and - seeing
differences - say that it is happened a "transformation", of a cause,
in its effect... from the birth till to the death.
WE, WE, WE - with our brain's intelligence - have the ABSOLUTE SPEED!
It is only OUR ANALYSIS that puts 207.542 metres how the necessary
width of the electromagnetic flow.
The LOVE for the SCIENCE allows to understand that:
1 advances only of 1, when it is alone, and so we have 1+1=1
10 is the cycle, whose only advancement are the 4 times of the
reality, and 10×4=40
100 is the area, whose only advancement has 5 directions (+x+y-x-y of
the area, and +t, the time), so 5×100=500
1000 is all the free mass, whose only advancement has 7 directions (+x
+y+z-x-y-z as volume and +t as time). So 7×1.000=7.000
10^4 is the FULL reality, and - being FULL - has 0 space/time to
advancement, being all already advanced.
10^5 is the electric and the magnetic in 10^10. They are 2, so
2×100.000 = 200.000.
I know, to do calculation is horrible, but only this system reveals
the invisible TRUTH, that 2+40+500+7.000+200.000=207542 represents
TRULY the IDEAL MODEL of the unitary advancement in all the dimensions
10^0, 10^1, 10^2, 10^3, 10^4 and 10^5... stop, because 10^5 us the
TOP! We also have only 5 fingers FOR THIS REASON of our brain, who
really uses the 10 cycle, to HAVE TIME OF LIFE, to have a "duration"
of what is truly simultaneous.
In thus precise way our intelligence fixes by calculus the ideal Width
that allows ALL THE PASSAGE in time-line.
In this way, the PRESENCE's life becomes slower, and we fix only
299.792.458 m passing in each second, slowly, in differentiated way,
divisible in infinite way. But, after 1 s, another part of the space-
time is observed. It is next one, it is nearly equal... and we dote
only the differences how "the becoming of what is only not much
different".
Only the calculus that I have made can seriously explain the invisible
TRUTH that the live is how a TAC (Tomography Axialis of the Computer).
When we make the TAC to a man and pass from the foots in direction of
the head, and move the instrument only a little, the differences
between 2 different sections are little ones. In speed, the TAC VISION
can seem the animation... of 2 foots that become the head? We know
that it is not the TRUTH, also if it so really appears, when we pass
examining any reality from section in section.
Because, in the reality flow, is always the section to advance... but
are only we that pass from one to the sequent one.
How the BODY at the TAC is one only, and his body goes from the foots
to the head, so the reality is: one only, always the same, but
differentiated in its body, how we are.
Have you seen? I really have "routed" the idea of the death. If we see
our movement in direction of the death, THIS IS THE SAME PROOF that we
have already passed beyond that point and have token the inverse
"train". If we are LIVING, just in this moment, and we are complexes,
positive-negative, electro-magnetic, matter-antimatter, etc. the
communication between these relative inversions exist through the
apparent "mortal point".
Do you know the difference between PHILOSOPHY and EPISTEMOLOGY? That
EPISTEMOLOGY is non AN OPINION, but reveals the transcendent TRUTH
that in the reality doesn't appear because it cannot.
My Epistemology, being not "a my opinion" but a serious discussion
starting from the Relative Truth already known, allows to extrapolate
what is valid in the FUTURE. Now, if you are "rational subjects"
CANNOT live how before, when you were discussing if the death exists
or not.
And this is valid because mine are not OPINIONS, but scientific
derivations obtained reasoning seriously about science. In my
epistemology, my "opinion" doesn't exists! Everything must be
demonstrated by a real and serious calculus.
Romano Amodeo

ornamentalmind

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 2:07:09 PM7/3/08
to Epistemology
Romano, when dealing with transcendental epistemology and philosophy,
should not these things be universal?

Sha1

unread,
Jul 11, 2008, 11:51:21 AM7/11/08
to Epistemology
I agree with you wholheartedly,Yes these things should be Universal,in
fact there is even Multiuniversal,The existence of "All Time" where
the Past,Present,Future Merge to become what is termed "The
Multidimensional Reality"One can Ramble on and on with scientific
formulea and scientific calculations,in their attempt towards proving
within our 3rd Dimensional Experiences,matters which Transends our 3rd
Dimensional Experience most call our Reality;But in order to
Scientifically Prove Theory beyond that known as the 3rd Dimensional
world of Reality,surely one Must be prepared to leave their confines &
comfort Zones of Matter in our 3rd Dimensional world & be prepared to
explore as well as experience even at least the next higher level of
Dimensional Vibration,then from experiencing this,work on formulating
A scientific formulae gained from the knowledge in which has
experienced.These Higher Vibratory Realities;the only way one can ever
hope to achieve this is by being Spiritual enough within the self as
to allow for experiencing things within a true Universal manner! With
Sincerity and Personal experience outside the confines of what most
call our real world,which in my personal experiences is-just a
fragment of a larger whole within a greater Universal/s manner.
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Sha1

unread,
Jul 11, 2008, 11:52:31 AM7/11/08
to Epistemology
Sorry 4 the dalays my Server keeps spitting the dummy on me.

On Jul 4, 4:07 am, ornamentalmind <ornamentalm...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Fabio

unread,
Jul 13, 2008, 3:35:15 AM7/13/08
to Epistemology
> derivations obtained reasoning seriously about science. In my ...
>
> leggi tutto

einseele

unread,
Jul 13, 2008, 4:45:04 PM7/13/08
to Epistemology
> And this is valid because mine are not OPINIONS, but scientific
> derivations obtained reasoning seriously about science. In my ...

Ehyyy Romano, Now I have to say I dont trust you anymore,
Your style has become soberbe and now I do not buy you dont now enough
English.
Your post reminded me an old joke. "My big house is at the North
Pole.. all its windows look southwards...", come on, this is trash.

C

archytas

unread,
Jul 14, 2008, 4:17:18 AM7/14/08
to Epistemology
Isn't the north pole disappearing for some reason this year Carlos?
Yup, trash.

naggig

unread,
Jul 14, 2008, 1:35:40 PM7/14/08
to Epistemology
I have never seen a way more elegant and attractive for treating this
matter.

It is always much difficult to make provision for the future time.
But really the intelligence teaches that when all the rules are
respected in any building, we must believe that this building stands,
also if we have not jet seen the day in which this building is really
built in the future time.
In this case, before seeing that day, we'll be died... but this, in my
opinion, is not the center of the matter.
This center is placed on the maximum respect of the Rules, and in this
case I think that it is.
Thank yoou very much! Now my life is less dramatic and more comforted
in its journey!

On 3 Lug, 17:59, amoram <ra.amo...@libero.it> wrote:
> derivations obtained reasoning seriously about science. In my ...
>
> leggi tutto

well

unread,
Jul 17, 2008, 2:18:58 AM7/17/08
to Epistemology
I image the great difficulty to open similar matters.
When Galileo told the same thing it looked a madness very difficult to
be understood...
Today nobody has a job doing its comprension.
So I think that when this same thing regarding the life will be
accepted, the idea of the death really is routed.
Romano Amodeo is a genius in step with his fellow-countryman!


On 3 Lug, 17:59, amoram <ra.amo...@libero.it> wrote:
> derivations obtained reasoning seriously about science. In my ...
>
> leggi tutto

terenz8

unread,
Jul 17, 2008, 5:49:43 AM7/17/08
to Epistemology
This Romano Amodeo seem really a new Galileo, how says "well"!
I'm reeding all his assumptions and they are really as new, as how
those of Galileo Galilei. Because this considered only one day, and
Amodeo considers all the days, of all the life... and the difference
is so only a quantitative question.
We really have two different "trains": the matter's one and of
antimatter. The two spirals, of the electron and of the positron (that
is the antimatter of the electron) have to opposites generation in the
degrees of its evolution in the time.

I have decided to help my fellow-countryman, because the existing easy
attitudes of a great lot of people to contrast, hardly, anyone
presents news that initially seem to be only eccentric positions!
The lesson just of Galileo Galilei really teaches that until the Churc
was in point to put him on the pyre.

On 3 Lug, 17:59, amoram <ra.amo...@libero.it> wrote:
> derivations obtained reasoning seriously about science. In my ...
>
> leggi tutto

amoram

unread,
Jul 17, 2008, 8:13:15 AM7/17/08
to Epistemology
Dear friend, I have elaborated a theory, and if you study the site
www.ordinespiritosanto.com you'll see it.
Goodbie!
> ...
>
> leggi tutto- Nascondi testo citato
>
> - Mostra testo citato

Georges Metanomski

unread,
Jul 17, 2008, 8:43:32 AM7/17/08
to episte...@googlegroups.com


--- On Thu, 7/17/08, amoram <ra.a...@libero.it> wrote:

> From: amoram <ra.a...@libero.it>
> Subject: [epistemology 9016] Re: "The Death's Idea IS ROUTED by Epistemology! Definitively!"... in Amodeo's result.
> To: "Epistemology" <episte...@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 1:13 PM
> Dear friend, I have elaborated a theory, and if you study
> the site
> www.ordinespiritosanto.com you'll see it.
> Goodbie!

===============
To bie or not to bie, that is the question.
Better not bie, that is the answer.
===============



amoram

unread,
Jul 18, 2008, 5:51:33 AM7/18/08
to Epistemology
The "Not to be" is impossible!
We are part of an immense Possibilistic System that, being in REAL
relation also with INTELLIGENCE, PASSION, and the other characteristic
of our SOUL, is in communication using OUR POSSIBILITIES.
Any of us has ONE FUNDAMENTAL AIM:
"To create the CREATOR, how the most Free Will".
The aim is the creation of ALL THE POSSIBLE IDEAS OF GOD, so that the
ABSOLUTE finally can be the solution of ANY Relative case.
Your EXISTENCE is... of GOD, becouse certainly it is not beyond the
ABSOLUTE of the ESSENCE.
So, in you, now, this ETERN GOD is crucified in your LIMIT, and He -
not you! - has the AIM to CREATE his FORM, relative to your relative
case.
So, also if you prefear the "not to be"... you'll be the HEIR OF GOD,
you'll be the MASTER of an existence made in the measure of your
limit... to can be absolutely free of it.

Romano Amodeo

On 17 Lug, 14:43, Georges Metanomski <zg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- On Thu, 7/17/08, amoram <ra.amo...@libero.it> wrote:

Georges Metanomski

unread,
Jul 18, 2008, 7:31:04 AM7/18/08
to episte...@googlegroups.com


--- On Fri, 7/18/08, amoram <ra.a...@libero.it> wrote:

> The "Not to be" is impossible!

==============
The "Not to be" an ass seems indeed quite impossible for
some illuminati. Not wishing to be personal I shall not
mention Amoram, Terenz8, Well, Goran, some mysterious
Romano Amodeo, Johnreed fancy dressed in pseudo-scientific
emperor's robe and a few others who escape my memory, to
whom I present most sincere apologies.
Georges.
==================



ornamentalmind

unread,
Jul 18, 2008, 1:19:16 PM7/18/08
to Epistemology

amoram

unread,
Jul 22, 2008, 10:10:14 AM7/22/08
to Epistemology
Excuse me, Ornamentalmind, but I don't know what I can replay to you,
because the too much long write doesn't allow to me to see your last
answer.
So here I have cut away all, to allow to you the reading.

Goodbie.
Romano

chazwin

unread,
Jul 22, 2008, 3:24:16 PM7/22/08
to Epistemology
So why the link to silly-si-bin headache remedy??
> ...
>
> read more »

ornamentalmind

unread,
Jul 23, 2008, 12:37:47 AM7/23/08
to Epistemology
"So why the link to silly-si-bin headache remedy??" - chaz

I looked at her profile and intuited that she had problems in this
area. Also, that she most likely has exhaused most other avenues.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages