Does anyone know if the code will run on newer versions of Racket than 6.11?

63 views
Skip to first unread message

Brian Hagerty

unread,
Oct 28, 2019, 11:35:20 AM10/28/19
to EOPL3
The Github repo for the book says that the code "should run right out of the box on Racket version 6.11" (per a readme updated around September 2018). Does anyone know if the latest version of Racket (now at 7.4) is fully backwards compatible with 6.11 such that the book's code should run in the latest version? 

Maybe nobody knows, but I thought I'd ask before installing a 2-year-old version of Racket. Thanks!


--Brian

Mitchell Wand

unread,
Oct 28, 2019, 12:52:19 PM10/28/19
to eopl3
I haven't tested it recently, but it should be fine.   Nothing fancy in the code.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "EOPL3" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to eopl3+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/eopl3/56748118-0eef-4082-8484-959e1dbfc209%40googlegroups.com.

Brian Hagerty

unread,
Oct 28, 2019, 1:10:59 PM10/28/19
to EOPL3
Thanks for the quick response!


On Monday, October 28, 2019 at 11:52:19 AM UTC-5, Mitch wrote:
I haven't tested it recently, but it should be fine.   Nothing fancy in the code.

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 8:35 AM Brian Hagerty <bhag...@gmail.com> wrote:
The Github repo for the book says that the code "should run right out of the box on Racket version 6.11" (per a readme updated around September 2018). Does anyone know if the latest version of Racket (now at 7.4) is fully backwards compatible with 6.11 such that the book's code should run in the latest version? 

Maybe nobody knows, but I thought I'd ask before installing a 2-year-old version of Racket. Thanks!


--Brian

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "EOPL3" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to eo...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages