EOPL3

Hi, all I'm working on ex5.40. I'm not sure what's the meaning of " Do this by

See pg 109. value-of returns a value of type ExpVal in the first position. So, l must be a (ref-val r

For me it helped when I worked out the syntax and then the semantics of mutually recursive letrec.

Thanks for the quick response! On Monday, October 28, 2019 at 11:52:19 AM UTC-5, Mitch wrote: I haven

I've now returned to the office, and I see that this bug is present in the printed copy on my

Hi all, I am a newbie in scheme language, I am dealing with a problem that how to create a new

I switched to guile and it works. I think this will work with elisp now, but I will leave that for

Hi dan, Thanks for explanation, any other good book resources for continuation passing style? I found

Hi, I implemented it like this, hope it's helpful. https://github.com/chenyukang/eopl/blob/master

Thanks. пятница, 21 марта 2014 г., 19:55:06 UTC+2 пользователь Mitch написал: These exercises refer

I should have mentioned this behavior only occurs when list operations are involved. Otherwise the

Work out manually the value of "value-of/k - (8 , 9) (empty-env) end-cont)" The successive

Hi, (make-vector number value) for example (make-vector 2 10) will produce #(10 10). in chapter 4 , I

Yes, there is no 'pack'. You can safely ignore that part of exercise 3.39. (Sorry about that.

Better late than never, but: This typo has now been added to the errata on the github repo . thanks.

Try downloading the code from github.com/mwand/eopl . I believe this code works out of the box for

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:37 AM, ziqiang bao <vsfl...@gmail.com> wrote: Thank you very much,

Dear Kurt and others, I believe that the most recent commit on github [b6cc63d3cf] runs in 5.3.6 out

Start by defining a new expressed value(s) for lists. Don't confuse the specification for list

Well, you need to add a list expression to the syntax. You also need to change the denoted and

Thank you very much! That got things going. Thanks again, Ken On Monday, October 14, 2013 4:28:00 PM

Hello, I need help with this problem 3.10 Add an operation list to the language. This operation

Sorry to be so slow in responding. From Section 4.1: "We model memory as a finite map from

You can represent an environment, a procedure that maps symbols to values as a function for example,

Hmm, this appears to be an issue with recent versions of Racket. To run the code in Racket 5.3.5,

Thanks . I didn't think it was intentional but sure why not... On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:16:

Hi all: this is a request for testing. The implementation of the EOPL libraries in Racket have been

That's an important help. When you do 3.26, you will learn what you need in order to do 3.42. On

The revised language and test suite has been committed to the racket git repository. It should be

Back when I was using the EOPL 2 code base in DrScheme, I was able to extend a given grammar simply