O.g. Movies To Watch

1 view

Skip to first unread message

Mary Hargrove

unread,

Aug 4, 2024, 7:44:41 PM8/4/24

to enwatquethand

Butwhat chance do evangelization or apologetics have if Catholics are unwilling to study, evaluate, and discuss cultural phenomena such as films? Is the safe path to let people have their likes and dislikes (apart, of course, from cases in which the content of the film is graphically offensive)?

Thornier still: what exactly are we condemning in those instances, and on what grounds? Shall we say everything goes, up to a specified few inches of flesh or number of pints of spilt blood? The issue of movies for Catholic viewers is the broader issue of culture: do we engage it, fight it, understand it, ignore it, transform it, build it, or what?

This is not a new problem. For more than a century, thoughtful Catholics have pondered the nature of film. The Catholicism of some directors (Alfred Hitchcock, Frank Capra, John Ford, Francis Ford Coppola, and Martin Scorsese, to name a few) clearly informs their artistry, regardless of their personal consistency with respect to doctrine. The creativity and reflection of Catholic film critics and directors greatly influenced papal consideration of film.

Most U.S. dioceses have abandoned local commentary on movies, and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has relegated its moral oversight to Catholic News Service (CNS). Even so, it should be clear that evaluation according to ethical norms is expected and must be guided by longstanding moral teachings, much of which is evident in classical as well as Hebrew and Christian society.

Do parents actually read the CNS reviews? Do other Catholic publications attempt film reviews? Based on my conversations with young Catholics students throughout the country, the CNS effort, while laudable, is too little known. Perhaps it is time for individual Catholics to understand that moral evaluation of movies is a universal responsibility and not just for bishops and their delegates.

What technical know-how might help a viewer evaluate and discuss movies? There are libraries filled with books on the subject and film studies programs of varying quality. But for our purpose, I suggest focusing attention in two areas to develop our capacity to perceive and not merely watch.

When I was growing up, my family went to the movie theater almost every week. It was when the movie was over and the credits came up that I became excited, because the popcorn was an insipid appetizer to the Chinese dinner or Italian feast that always followed. The Faheys would occupy a restaurant table for hours on end, debating the merits of every movie we saw. I own a small film library now and have heard many lectures on films, but none of them can compare to the richness of those mealtime conversations.

Be thoughtful. Nosce te ipsum. Think of your life. What are your strengths and weaknesses? What are your besetting (recurring) sins? Are these areas strengthened or worsened by watching Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, Peacock, etc.?

Finally, what about those who suffer from over-scrupulosity? Should we quibble about everything we watch? Should we feel strong guilt and emotional discomfort at all movies with morally ambiguous content?

Reproduction of material from this website without written permission, or unlicensed commercial use or monetization of National Catholic Register RSS feeds is strictly prohibited.

Obviously we can solve it with backtracking, trying all possibilities. Is there better way to do it? I have an idea of starting with movies with least number of available times first, that way we can find the solution faster if there's a solution, the worst case time complexity is still the same.

Depending on the bounds on the number of movies and number of possible different times for each movies, you could create a bipartite graph with the movies in one side and the times in the other side and run a maximum flow algorithm to determine the maximum matching. If movie i can be watched at time j, then add an edge between the corresponding nodes in the graph.

Looks like a maximum matching problem on a bipartite graph. The vertices of the graph are the two independent sets 'hours of the day' and 'film titles'. The edges of the graph are showings of a particular film at a particular time.

According to Steven Skiena's Algorithm Design Manual, the best known algorithm is the Hopcroft-Karp algorithm which runs in O(E*sqrt(V)). E is the number of edges, ie. the number of showings. V is the number of vertices, ie. the number of films plus the number of distinct hours during which films are shown. In your example, E = 8 showings, V = 4 films + 4 distinct times = 8.

The Mountain Between Us, It, Murder on the Orient Express, Wonder, My Cousin Rachel. These films released in 2017 have one thing in common, and you may have guessed it already: They were all books that were later adapted into movies.

As an avid reader, I am always excited at the news that a book is being adapted as a feature film. My mind is occupied by thoughts of who the actors/actresses are going to be (and if I approve), if the film will stay true to the book, and most importantly, if the movie will be just as good as the book. The thought of finally being able to visualize what has only previously been limited to my imagination is always an exciting prospect.

However, I am usually underwhelmed after watching a certain film based on a book, and if you asked me a year ago which one I would prefer: the movie or the book, I would have immediately chosen the book.

However, watching the same story unfold on the big screen is a different experience. While reading spurs your imagination, a movie helps you visualize all the elements of the books that were previously confined to your imagination. It immerses you into the story in a different way than a book.

Robiati Endashaw offers a balanced perspective on the age-old debate between books and their movie adaptations. As an avid reader, she acknowledges the initial skepticism toward films based on beloved books. However, she also appreciates the unique advantages of both mediums of storytelling. While books allow for deeper immersion and detailed character development, movies excel in visual storytelling and immersive experiences. Endashaw emphasizes that comparing books and movies is like comparing apples to oranges; they serve different purposes and offer distinct pleasures. Her insights encourage readers to appreciate the merits of both forms of storytelling and explore adaptations with an open mind.

Oh gee thanks so much . I also feel quite the same way too when it comes to books as in they are so much enjoyable because they allow us as the reader to explore the depths of my imagination and every thing happening Is felt dearly.

Whether you need a little downtime after a busy weekend or enjoy taking time out on a weekend, here are some family-friendly movies everyone will love. You can delight kids and adults alike, while also creating long-lasting memories when you turn on one of these movies to watch with family. Here is a comprehensive collection of the best family films ever made.

Spending time together as a family is important because it strengthens your bonds and creates shared memories you all treasure for years to come. By engaging in an activity together, you get to know your family members better and improve your understanding of what they care about and why.

Starting with Cinderella and continuing with this charming 2007 film, Disney has been rewriting the princess motif with a modern flair. Cartoon princess Giselle (Amy Adams) accidentally winds up in a very real New York City, where she meets Robert (Patrick Dempsey) and finds the happily ever after that eluded her in Andalasia.

The well-reviewed Enchanted was both a parody of outdated ideas from old Disney movies and an homage to their good points, with several standout song-and-dance numbers kids will love. The PG-rated movie, directed by Kevin Lima, is appropriate for kids 5 and older. You can watch the one-hour, 47-minute film on Disney+ or rent it on AppleTV+, YouTube or Google Play TV & Movies.

The beautifully animated 2017 film Coco is a fantasy focused on the Mexican holiday Day of the Dead. Young wannabe musician Miguel (voiced by Anthony Gonzalez) clashes with his grandmother about becoming a musician and becomes temporarily banished to the realm of the dead.

Coco is rated PG and best for ages 7 and up at an hour and 45 minutes. With an original conceit and skillful direction by Lee Unkrich and co-director Adrian Molina, Coco is a feast for the eyes and the ears, laden with catchy original music. The film received exceptional reviews for its gorgeous animation and creative portrayal of the Day of the Dead, and it offers a chance to teach children about a treasured cultural tradition. You can watch Coco on Disney+.

Shameik Moore voices Miles as a kind and confused kid trying to do the best with his newfound great responsibility." Directors Bob Persichetti, Peter Ramsey and Rodney Rothman embrace the multiverse, which can spark great family conversations about time travel. The PG-rated, one-hour, 56-minute film and its 2023 sequel, Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse, earned outstanding reviews. You can watch it on Hulu and fubo TV or rent it on Amazon Prime Video, Vudu, AppleTV+, YouTube or Google Play TV & Movies

The remake of the 1961 retelling of Romeo & Juliet in contemporary New York City features some of the best song-and-dance numbers ever put on film. Directed by Steven Spielberg and starring Rachel Zegler and Ansel Elgort as star-crossed lovers Maria and Tony, the movie explores issues of identity and family loyalty.

Proper Paddington bear from Peru finds himself in London, where a family adopts him and chaos ensues. This utterly delightful 2014 film, directed by Paul King and with a run time of one hour, 35 minutes, earned a near-perfect 97% rating on Rotten Tomatoes thanks to its fresh writing and well-imagined cinematography.