Informal vs Formal is subjective, technically we're discussing third-
party property rights. By that I mean that, any contractual dispute
(whether about the ownership of property, ideas or products, or a
legal wrangle) can be sorted out by a recognised third-party whose
decision is recognised and respected by both. Normally that is a
government. When the government is not respected, or when the cost of
getting the protection of that government is too high, then the
relationships between market players breaks down. An informal market
is really a fragmented localised market where only people who trust
one another directly are prepared to trade with each other.
The epitome of this is the stokvel / gooi-gooi / group saving schemes
that prevail in informal markets. They allow for small groups of
people to pool their resources and negotiate for cash for goods with
other people who would not trust them or allow them credit.
We've been tracking the informal markets in South Africa and Zimbabwe
for the last year to build up a model of how it works. It is very
sophisticated but, at the same time, very fragile. It is amazing how
goods and services are communicated / distributed across a continent
given that - at each step - no-one is able to enforce contracts or
ensure payment.
There are a few good books on the subject: Hernando de Soto's Mystery
of Capital, and CK Prahalad's Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid.
Prahalad, in particular, has stimulated the thinking a small number of
companies that specialise in assisting the formal sector to invest in
and understand the informal sector. This is a very thin line of
endeavour at present, but it is slowly gaining ground since it - in
comparison to aid - actually works. Whythawk Ratings (http://
www.whythawk.com/) is pretty much the only company operating in South
Africa purely as a BOP company (rather than a charity or fundraiser).
Gavin Chait
Whythawk Ratings
That was beautifully said, in fact it could easily be a forward to an
economic development book. Interestingly at the IBM Global
Innvovation Outlook on Africa, which visited Atlanta, GA a few weeks
ago (and will be in Jo'Berg in rougly three weeks I think) there were
so many US Fortune 500 execs seriously pondering the issue that it
would seem that it is a larger movement.
But I think you are right, so much of the discussion on African
economic development uses an either or approac-either aid or trade,
that those discussions somehow overshadow this one. A few weeks ago
Imnakoya of African Loft and Grandiose Parlor made a very sagelike
comment, he said something to the effect that informal markets in
Africa bring together many differnt aspects of socio-economic policy
and brings about a discussion where law, business, entrepreneursip,
infratstructure, and so forth are intertwined. After thinking about
his statement my attitude towards things shifted a little bit away
from the very narrow entrepreneurship focus[that is still my focus but
I am much more aware now of the relationship between that and some of
these other areas and awareness brings about subtle changes]. In
fact, Emeka made a similar comment in the comments section of the 2nd
carnival of africa enterprising, which is on african loft.
Mr. Chait, should the discussion be about how to get the informal
sector to become part of the formal sector or should it be how to
cater to the informal sector?
> comparison to aid - actually works. Whythawk Ratings (http://www.whythawk.com/) is pretty much the only company operating in South
Neither. I've said this before: the informal sector is a symptom, and
an important bellwether, of general economic conditions. Any central
state wanting to represent the interests of its people should be doing
its best to set up a fair and equatable legal and economic framework.
If corrupt politicians are rewarded and kept in office then no amount
of incentives is going to make businesses who abandoned the state come
back. Corruption breeds corruption.
What the state should do is ignore the informal sector and do their
level best to make the formal sector as powerful, dynamic, flexible
and simple-to-use as is humanly possible. If I have to spend five
hours in a queue to get a form to register my company, and another 12
months to wait for registration approval (if the form isn't lost) ...
guess what, I'm not going to bother trying to register in the first
place.
A state should realise that - as with any competitive environment -
business owners and investors have the choice not to participate if
they so choose. If you run a coffee shop and sell dreadful coffee
with poor service you don't send staff to go next door to the popular
cafe and bribe people going in to come to you (well you can, but that
seems very expensive and silly business). And, if you really do offer
bribes to come in, I'll take your bribe and I'll still spend the money
where I want to.
A "need" ... for jobs, for the informal sector to join the formal
sector, for a cure to cancer ... does not make it happen. People with
ability will simply take their abilities elsewhere. Africa has been
whining for decades about their "need" for investment but haven't
offered anything meaningful to invest in. So all they got was charity
which gets used up and wasted.