In a folder on this site named Current Issues, I will put the central posts we, the Enki Leadership, shared with all in our efforts to find understanding. I would encourage those interested to particularly read the one on Empowerment in Enki.
The Current Issue in a Nutshell:
The difficulty at hand began when some parents did not want to abide by the decision of the Enki Leadership on the use of the Enki name (which is trademarked, as they were told from the beginning).
Despite much invitation for conversation and much actual conversation, and despite our providing a Facebook group for any Enki package owner, they refused to honor our decision. As a result, they were told that they were not welcome to the complimentary services offered by the Leadership - they are still eligible to receive the services that were described as part of their packages at the time they purchased.
So that is what sparked the explosion of anger. We did try to work through the issues with them, as you can see in the chronological synopsis below and as is detailed in the Current Issues folder, but no progress was made.
Underlying Enki Perspective: While the name use issue may not be that important to most, I think the underlying issue should be since it affects all we do. Parents come in to Enki for a time, and their input is a very important part of showing us how we can best tailor our delivery of Enki to support them - and over the years we have made countless adaptations to the delivery of information (not to the core of what Enki is). But this input does not and cannot steer the heart of the work. Maintaining the integrity of Enki is the job of the leadership, and for Enki to survive, the decisions we make for Enki must be abided by.
Enki is a unique and specific approach to education and, although we support and strongly encourage every parent to adapt the work to serve his or her family, all decisions for Enki itself (curriculum content, methodology, official discussion groups, programs, faculty, use of the Enki name, etc.) are made by the Enki Directors, through consensus. So we do solicit input from the community to help us see as broadly and deeply as possible, but decisions are the right and responsibility of the leadership and are not made through a democratic processes. For those seeking a program run as a democracy or through consensus, Enki is not a good fit.
There is an outline of the chronology of this issue below, and details on how we approached it will be put in the Current Issues file asap. But probably most important here is that this issue brought to light the importance of people knowing more about how Enki is governed. To that end, the posts in the Current Issues file on Community, and on Empowerment, and on Decision Making in Enki, would be good to read if this is of concern to you. If nothing else, a scan of the posts there will tell you a lot about how we work with issues and problems.
I hope this proves helpful, and allows people to make an informed decision about how they see this issue and whether Enki is a good fit for them.
Please feel free to ask more questions here. We look forward to clarifying here, and discussing any questions you have on this or any other aspect of the program.
Beth
Brief Chronology (it was a 6 month process, so even brief is long!):