Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Booze Cruise

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Brian Watson

unread,
Jun 1, 2008, 8:16:52 AM6/1/08
to

"Tom Barry" <il...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:AWv0k.48298$Zs3....@newsfe20.ams2...
> tims next home wrote:
>>
>> I am sure that the office of the mayor never thought that anything like
>> this would happen.
>>
>> After all, there wasn't a history of parties on the tube

You might like to take a look on YouTube before you repeat that assertion.

>> so I doubt that anyone thought that someone would arrange one on the last
>> day.

It was well publicised in plenty of time for suitable action (good
people-management skills deployed around the Circle Line and a few
suitably-placed police vans for the excessive revelers) to be taken.

> Considering the Mayor is an intelligent man with some idea of the English
> character,

Y'see, that's where you're going wrong; with that assumption at the outset.

I look forward to Doris' "wise" words on the subject once he gets back to
the office.

--
Brian
"Fight like the Devil, die like a gentleman."


redcat

unread,
Jun 1, 2008, 12:07:05 PM6/1/08
to
Brian Watson wrote:
>>
> I look forward to Doris' "wise" words on the subject once he gets back to
> the office.
>

What is the meaning and intention behind changing "Boris" to "Doris"?

rc

Message has been deleted

Brian Watson

unread,
Jun 2, 2008, 3:47:38 AM6/2/08
to

"redcat" <red...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:hvadnToQot-3VN_V...@earthlink.com...

He is what is known colloquially as a "bit of an old woman."

Since "Doris" and "Boris" are so similar in sound and "Doris" is a name now
rarely used, but was commonly given to girls about 80 years ago, it seemed
an appropriate substitution.

Should I be crossposting this to alt.english.usage, Cat?

:-)

James Farrar

unread,
Jun 2, 2008, 8:29:24 AM6/2/08
to
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 08:47:38 +0100, "Brian Watson"
<WACC...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"redcat" <red...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
>news:hvadnToQot-3VN_V...@earthlink.com...
>> Brian Watson wrote:
>>>>
>>> I look forward to Doris' "wise" words on the subject once he gets back to
>>> the office.
>>>
>>
>> What is the meaning and intention behind changing "Boris" to "Doris"?
>
>He is what is known colloquially as a "bit of an old woman."
>
>Since "Doris" and "Boris" are so similar in sound and "Doris" is a name now
>rarely used, but was commonly given to girls about 80 years ago, it seemed
>an appropriate substitution.

In other words, it was a childish insult.

redcat

unread,
Jun 2, 2008, 10:00:32 AM6/2/08
to

No, Brian. No crossposting necessary; nor cross dressing. I feel if
Boris Johnson is to get a drubbing, his name should be used. Imagine if
someone attempted to besmirch him with the name "Brian", since his name
begins with a "B" and Brian was a name commonly given to boys 70 about
years ago. This would signal he's "a bit of an old man".

Makes about as much sense as "Doris" and would make a Brian or two feel
singled out at the old pub.

For your edification, here are some not "old woman" women named Doris:
Doris Duke, Doris Day, Doris Lessing, Doris Roberts.

Cat

Adrian

unread,
Jun 2, 2008, 10:29:38 AM6/2/08
to
redcat <red...@ix.netcom.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:

> For your edification, here are some not "old woman" women named Doris:
> Doris Duke

Which one? There's two in Wikipedia, one born 1912, the other 1945

> Doris Day

Born 1924

> Doris Lessing

Born 1919

> Doris Roberts

Born 1930

Some bunch of not "old women".

redcat

unread,
Jun 2, 2008, 1:23:26 PM6/2/08
to

You just don't get it, do you?

Adrian

unread,
Jun 2, 2008, 1:28:36 PM6/2/08
to

>>> Doris Day

>> Born 1924

>>> Doris Lessing

>> Born 1919

>>> Doris Roberts

Ah. They don't seem old to you, because they're younger than you are.
Gotcha.

It's the only reason I can think of why five women with an average age of
82 somehow don't count as "old women".

Brian Watson

unread,
Jun 3, 2008, 4:41:11 AM6/3/08
to

"James Farrar" <james.s...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:lsp7441adllmjs44f...@4ax.com...

Correct. Accurate, nonetheless.

0 new messages