Research outline

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Paul

unread,
May 8, 2007, 5:59:21 PM5/8/07
to Energy Mover
Here's an updated outline of the research -->

http://emwiki.info/free-energy.html


Regards,
Paul Lowrance

sandpiper

unread,
May 13, 2007, 10:03:32 PM5/13/07
to Energy Mover
Paul,

I know the core you are using is a Metglas AM CC-320 core. Has anyone
checked into other companies that may be able to produce a core
compatible to this Metglas AM CC-320 core? If there is another company
that can produce it, maybe you could have the core made to your
specifications. I was wondering mainly of some companies overseas that
may be able to make such a part?

Regards

Paul Lowrance

unread,
May 14, 2007, 11:43:03 AM5/14/07
to energ...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

I haven't tested the AMCC cores yet. Hopefully Rob can do this. I did a quick
test on one of the Finemet cores using the new testing method and it appears to
be somewhat square! :-) Although this was just a recent quick peek. I just
figured out (although not yet verified) the old method of using 100 KHz signal
in conjunction to 60 Hz can have undesirable results because of core property
variances in frequency. Therefore, the testing procedure should contain just one
frequency.


Regards,
Paul Lowrance

Paul

unread,
Jun 13, 2007, 1:25:18 PM6/13/07
to Energy Mover
I was away from the research for the past 4 weeks building a car
website for a friend of a friend as a favor. It's good to be back!

I took my computer magnetic simulation software about as far as
possible unless I come up with another major software speed increase.
Presently my computer can handle a magnetic core up to 512 x 512 x 1
dipole moments. So the entire core is 512 dipoles wide, so a toroid
core thickness could typically be 512/3 = 171 dipoles thick.
Essentially that's a few grains, but the simulation does not
incorporate grains since it's too slow. In a nutshell, this is
basically a single grain simulation, lol. Therefore, it's nearly
impossible to achieve a consistent core with high permeability. The
simulations varied so much due to thermal noise that it caused
significant variations in cores. For example, one core would be in a
state where ambient energy was easily extractable, but not in another
core.

Regardless of the limitations in simulation speed & size, a great deal
of priceless information was gained. It appears it is now time to
move beyond the simulations, as they now offer very little help. Next
is to try and piece all the information together in my mind and think
of viable methods to extract the well-known ambient energy by means of
magnetic material.

The schedule was offset by roughly 5 to 9 months due to Metglas
sending me a transversely annealed core instead of a longitudinally
annealed core. Furthermore, the simulations took significantly longer
than anticipated. Hopefully all that was learned will reveal a viable
method of capturing ambient energy (by means of a common and cheap
magnetic core such as silicon iron) within the next 4 months.

Site update:
http://emwiki.info


Regards,
Paul Lowrance

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages