나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 2023 VOD 영화 무료보기 1080P 다운로드 OTT 넷플릭스

[전상욱]

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 2023 VOD 영화 무료보기 1080P 다운로드 OTT 넷플릭스

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 일드 2022 추천 중국드라마 애니 보는사이트 애니24 누누티비 중드 HD

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 일본드라마 다시보기 링크 2023 한국영화 OST

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 인물관계도 같은드라마 주요인물 주변인물 포스터

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 방영일정 하이라이트 편성표 방송정보 OTT

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 중드 무협 사극 판타지 현대 명장면 명대사

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 한글자막 자막 시청률 VOD CGV

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 스트리밍 다운 링크 마그넷 실시간

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 무료보기 토렌트 TORRENT OST 결말

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 다운로드 무료 다시보기 SIM 보는곳 보는법 무료보기

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 고화질 1080P 720P 480P 번외

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 드라마 더쿠 결말 소설 리뷰 후기 방송채널

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 몇부작 자막 등장인물 방영일 보는곳 피클티비 쿠키

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 키스신 배우 볼수있는곳 줄거리 WETV 위티비

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 완결 전편 인물관계도 리뷰 원작 무료보기

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 후기 재미 SBS TVN JTBC 다운 HDTV NEXT 스트리밍

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 1화 2화 3화 4화 5화 6화 7화 8화 9화 10화 누누티비

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 11화 12화 13화 14화 15화 16화 17화 18화 19화 20화

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 21화 22화 23화 24화 25화 26화 27화 28화 29화 30화

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 31화 32화 33화 34화 35화 36화 37화 38화 39화 40화

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 dailymotion 데일리모션 보는법 네이버 유투브 애니 특전 극장판

나는 여기에 있다 다시보기 나무위키 줄거리 방영일정 넷플릭스 왓챠 디즈니 플러스 티빙

If you do this, the first generation will increase, and even if you adopt the theory of 《Three Kingdoms》 of Jinsu and see King Shin as the son of the second king, the second generation will increase. Shin Chae-ho, in 《Joseon Sanggosa》, did not refer to other historical books and recalculated the chronology, and hypothesized that King Taejo was not the grandson of King Yurimyeong, but the grandson of King Daemusin. If so, it is still true that King Gwanggaeto the Great is a descendant of Jumong, but there are some inconsistencies.

Jaesa is regarded as the son of King Daemusin, King Chadaewang was born in 71 and King Shin was born in 89, so even if King Shin is considered the son of King Daemusin, King Gwanggaeto the Great is the 15th generation descendant of Jumong. In <Wiji> Dongyijeon of 《Three Kingdoms》, the royal lineage of Goguryeo in the early period is passed down as Jumong-Yeodal-Yeoyul-Makrae, and Makrae is presumed to be a mistake of the model. Yeo-dal is classified as King Yu-ri-myeong, and based on the record that Mak-rae attacked Buyeo before <Wiji>, Dong-yi-jeon sees Mak-rae as King Daemusin, not King Mo-bon, and if Yeo-yul between Yeo-dal and Mak-rae is the same as Yeo-jin, son of King Yu-ri-myeong, King Gwanggaeto the Great can be made the 17th generation descendant (16th generation descendant) of King Dongmyeongseong as follows. In modern times, the title of King of Remembrance is attracting more attention than King Dongmyeong due to respect for the record of the tombstone of King Gwanggaeto the Great. Perhaps because of this influence, a theory arose that King Dongmyeong and King Chumo were separate figures.

For reference, <Legend of King Dongmyeong> corresponds to a large extent with the founding story of Buyeo found in <Nonhyeong> <Gilheom>. In other words, in the process of deifying Jumong, the founding king of Goguryeo, the ancestor <The Legend of King Dongmyeong> was borrowed. The story itself is almost the same, as is the part moving from Gori-guk → Buyeo, Buyeo → Goguryeo, so the story that a large part of it borrows from <The Legend of King Dongmyeong> is evaluated as a credible story.

A KBS history special aired content related to the borrowing of Goguryeo and Buyeo tales. The founding story of King Dongmyeongseong, that is, the sky god or the sky god's son through love with the river god's daughter gave birth to a son. It is a story often seen in Professor Beckwith said that not only nomadic nations such as Scythians, Xiongnu, Mongols, and Turks, but also many settled nations influenced by central Eurasia, such as ancient Rome and China's Zhou Dynasty, have similar stories as their founding tales. It is said to have been corrected, but from the time of his son, King Yurimyeong, it comes back as the Hae clan (《Samguk Yusa》, 〈Wangryeok〉), raising doubts about the royal line in the early Goguryeo period. However, since various problems are found in the genealogy of not only King Dongmyeongseong, but later Goguryeo royal families, the Goguryeo theory of the Hae family exists. According to this, Jumong's original surname must have been Hae, not Go, but since Go was borrowed from the sixth king, King Taejo, King Sosurim must have fabricated the surname of the founding monarch.

Or, it is correct to use Hae, but there is an opinion that King Taejo, who was originally a collateral, began to use the surname Go, and in the process of deifying the family of King Chumo, King Dongmyeong-seong emphasized that he was a Go family. In this way, King Yurimyeong and King Daemusin would naturally become Go clans, so the history of using Hae as their surname was buried. Not only Goguryeo, but Baekje and Silla also make errors that cannot be seen as facts in the genealogy of early kings. There is a strong possibility that the royal family who established the throne from the middle period manipulated the king's genealogy to solidify their legitimacy. Therefore, controversy over the surname and genealogy of the founder of Goguryeo, Jumong, is inevitable.

There is also a theory that it is the same person as 'Goguryeo Hu(侯) Chu' [36] in 《Huhanseo》. However, in 《History of the Three Kingdoms》, this 'Chu' is our (Goguryeo) general, 'Yeonbi', and it is written that China has captured the king. <Goguryeo Bongi> Data exists in the Yurimyeong Dynasty. In 《Dongguk Tonggam》, it is said that Chinese general Eom Woo captured 'Goguryeo general Huchu' (高句麗將 侯鄒), and then China degraded the king as 'Haguryeo Hu'.