Licensing

[tslprod...@gmail.com]

Hi there.

I'm one of the software developers at TSL Products. 

We're implementing Ember+ in a new product and we were going to use your libember_slim library as the base but it's released under the LGPL which we can't comply with. Is there anyway we can use this under a more open license (e.g. MIT) if we release the edited library code after?

Regards

Tom 

[Hoffmann, Kimon (LAWO)]

Hi Tom,

> We're implementing Ember+ in a new product and we were going to use your libember_slim library as the base but it's released under the LGPL which we can't comply with. Is there anyway we can use this under a more open license (e.g. MIT) if we release the edited library code after?

Actually we decided upon relicensing the SDK under a more liberal license quite siome time ago, but have not yet made the change to the repository.
I just did that and all C and C++ code in the SDK is now licensed under version 1.0 of the Boost Software License. You may also assume that the same licensing terms apply to previous, packaged releases of the SDK.

Best regards,
Kimon


Lead Software Developer & Systems Architect

--
Lawo AG | Am Oberwald 8 | 76437 Rastatt | Germany
Phone +49 7222 1002 5810 | www.lawo.com
--
Lawo AG | Registered Office: Rastatt | Amtsgericht Mannheim HRB 707330
CEO: Philipp Lawo | Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Christian Otto, Attorney at Law

[tslprod...@gmail.com]

Hey Kimon

Thanks for doing that, very much appreciated. We'll release the branched code for others. Also for your 'companies using' list we've implemented Ember+ in Tallyman and will be releasing to the public soon.

Regards

Tom

[Hoffmann, Kimon (LAWO)]

Hi Tom,

> Thanks for doing that, very much appreciated. We'll release the branched code for others. Also for your 'companies using' list we've implemented Ember+ in Tallyman and will be releasing to the public soon.

Done, TSL Products is now listed om the "Companies Using" page.

Regards,

Kimon Hoffmann