OK, what do you think about a suitable copyright?
Sergio thinks putting the EluaOnMizar32 book on the elua projects site
is a good idea.
I've not put any content into the one I cobbled together in a manic
afternoon, so no work lost there.
I haven't poured the wiki contents and circuit diagrams into any container yet.
Dado, if you can create a suitable structure I'll be happy to work there.
Is everyone happy with MarkDown as an input language and the git-gittery hassle?
M
On 12 February 2011 02:12, Dado Sutter <dados...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Guys,
> Here I am, ready for some action :)
OK, what do you think about a suitable copyright?
Sergio thinks putting the EluaOnMizar32 book on the elua projects site
is a good idea.
I've not put any content into the one I cobbled together in a manic
afternoon, so no work lost there.
I haven't poured the wiki contents and circuit diagrams into any container yet.
Dado, if you can create a suitable structure I'll be happy to work there.
Is everyone happy with MarkDown as an input language and the git-gittery hassle?
M
Brill
>> Is everyone happy with MarkDown as an input language and the git-gittery
>> hassle?
>
> No :)
Which? (Or both?)
Don't we already have a wiki page for this? The proto-TOC
If github will process Markdown into a printable PDF I'm happy (but
I'm a stickler for good typography - a semi-auto-page-index would be
useful etc)
Can MarkDown do that? Can any of our wiki engines?
M
On 12 February 2011 19:37, Dado Sutter <dados...@gmail.com> wrote:Brill
> Sure, as suggested above. Can I:
> - create a eLuaOnMizar32Book project under the eLua organization @github ?
> - create a special wiki section on wiki.eluaproject.net only for the book ?
Which? (Or both?)
>> Is everyone happy with MarkDown as an input language and the git-gittery
>> hassle?
>
> No :)
Sorry,that doesn't look very clear. I mean something that will
generate an alphabetical subject index at the back of the book with
all the right page numbers in it.
M
Dado,
http://writeboard.com is a free service for writing things
collaboratively. It's very very simple, not specifically for books and
solve just the collaboration and revision part of the problem. I think
you'll see it as one more tool that lacks everything else in the world
to be good enough. ;) . I just recommend to give a try, without much
expectation.
[]s
Mauricio
>
> Best
> Dado
>
>
>
>
It is not true. ;)
> I think the best way to go is to use local tools and a nice versioning
> system.
> I'm not the right one to suggest the best writing tool (and I'm afraid of
> the complexity of some :)
>
>> []s
>>
>> Mauricio