Dr. Hardell is a well-known Finnish scientist and
researcher on cancer who has for years spoken out on the health
impacts of wireless. In this paper he critiques ICNIRP, the
standard setting body that virtually every country in the world
relies on when setting exposure guidelines for wireless
radiation/5G in their country. (NB: There are dozens of excellent
critiques of ICNIRP’s “science”, members, ties to industry etc.
This one was just released so is being featured here.)
In this paper, Dr. Hardell draws attention to ICNIRP's
members who belong to many expert panels and set the RF
recommendations/guidelines based on the theory that no harm occurs
unless there are thermal effects, aka heating.
In this paper, Dr. Hardell takes the Netherlands Health Council to
task for failing in its responsibility to protect the public
by relying on ICNIRP. He gives many examples of studies ignored or
misrepresented by ICNIRP.
Health Council of the Netherlands and evaluation of
the fifth generation, 5G, for wireless communication and cancer
"In contrast to that as a general rule, ICNIRP, WHO, SSM, and
SCENIHR have for many years dismissed available studies showing
harmful effects from nonthermal RF radiation exposure and have
based their conclusions mainly on studies showing no effects.
Thereby results showing health hazards are criticized or not even
cited in contrast to studies showing no risks that are accepted as
evidence of no risk in spite of severe methodological problems.
Many of the statements by these agencies are misleading and not
correct. They are easily rebutted by reading the relevant
publications. In fact, an Italian court ruling linked mobile phone
use to tumors already in 2012. Also, later court rulings in Italy
have come to the same conclusion.
These ICNIRP cartel dominated expert groups consequently reach
similar conclusions that there are no health effects below ICNIRP
guidelines. Scientists with opinions that there is increasing
evidence of health risks below the ICNIRP guidelines, e.g., as
expressed in the EMF Scientists Appeal, are not invited to expert
groups at the WHO, the EU (SCENIHR), the SSM, or ICNIRP. Table 1
clearly illustrates that few persons constitute different groups
aimed at preventing hazards and risks to the health and the
environment. The ICNIRP view is thereby influencing these expert
reports, which also formed the basis for this Health Council
report in the Netherlands....
However, it is unacceptable that there is scanty research being
performed on the risks or hazards from the new 5G technology and
the new frequencies that will be used. This means an experiment on
human health and the environment that should not be accepted. Thus
informed consent would be needed from each involuntary exposed
Hardell L. Health Council of the Netherlands and evaluation of the
fifth generation, 5G, for wireless communication and cancer
risks. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(6): 393-403
[PMID: 34189065 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i6.393]
From Google Groups Keep Space4Peace