Thanks for playing :) as you seen maybe from edited title they are LTO (Lithium-titanate, Li4Ti5O12) cells.
They are installed on the 8s PCB's I made some long time ago for Supercapacitors and so in the extra two places I just installed jumper wires 16AWG solid wires as this is just a 6s setup thus it looks like all cell sense wires are used but they are shorted on the board.
The internal impedance is for all cells around 11.3mOhm (at 1kHz) while DC internal resistance is about 2x that around 22mOhm.
I wanted to get this for some years now to test so I can have better default parameters for LTO (battery type 3) in my SBMS as the ones there are firly conservative with cut-out at 2.6V but I will likely change that to 2.7V
Still for 12V systems 5s will have a bit to low of a voltage and 6s is a bit to high but you need to chose 6s will work better and if you need something like this for a 18V power tool then 8s seems to be a good choice.
In any case I charged them to 2.8V (as per spec) but it was constant current charging only so I stopped there did not also do a constant voltage until current dropped as I did not wanted to stress this cells.
In any case here are the results. The data was collected manually as I just did not had the time to setup any automated log but resolution is good enough to get an idea of how this cells work.
On the charge side there is no clear cut off place like there is with LiFePO4 where it is clear going above 3.5V makes no sense as battery can not accept any more charge here it seems it will continue to accept charge even after the already high limit of 2.8V. On the discharge end it is as clear as with LiFePO4 as you can see below 2.2V the voltage drops very fast showing that there is nothing else available so a 2V cut out make sense for this same as 2.8V for LiFePO4.
Below a few photos of the SBMS0 screen during charge and discharge.
Just before starting to charge
Just after starting to charge at 1A constant current that is about 0.4C for this battery.

End of charging (the default limits where lower so I forced changing manually to 2.8V)
Just after I started discharging.
Around middle of discharge. Ignore the SOC as I needed to restart the SBMS0 due to force charging to 2.8V and exceeding the overcharge lock limit.
The end of discharge and since discharge was done at constant power (DC-DC converter powering an LED) and the voltage dropped significantly the current increased.
Just a few minutes after discharge ended the voltage recovered above 2.2V but it will drop back below 2V in just a few seconds if I connect the load.
Battery capacity (sorry for the blur image). 2364mAh (close enough to spec 2500mAh) and 33.5Wh 33500mWh/2364mAh = 14.17V / 6s = 2.36V nominal per cell again close enough to claimed 2.4V
Discharge current curve notice the fast increase of current at the end as voltage dropped rapidly.
The power curve fairly constant at around 17.2W so around 0.5C discharge rate.
Some final conclusions:
LTO is great but just to expensive in therms of cost amortization when compared to LiFePO4 as a typical 40Ah 2.3V LTO is around 40CAD while a 200Ah 3.2V CATL can be had for around 75CAD (none of this prices include shipping or import taxes) the 310Ah CATL is around 115CAD all average prices from Alibaba.
So 40Ah x 2.3V = 92Wh thus 1000/92 = 10.87 x 40CAD = 435CAD/kWh
And LiFePO4 310Ah x 3.2V = 992Wh basically 1kWh thus 115CAD/kWh
Shipping for same capacity will be lower for LiFePO4 as it will be 2x lighter than LTO
So LTO is 3 to 4x more expensive for same capacity but is unlikely will be able to last that much longer as good LiFePO4 should last at minimum 10 to 15 years thus that will require LTO to last 40 to 60 years to be even and even so paying 3 to 4x the price for same capacity in advanced is not a good strategy even if the battery where to last 40+ years.