You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Eiffel Users
Benchmarking Eiffel Xpact and C eXpath
USING: eXpat XML parser (pure C) Parsing: libexpat/testdata/largefiles/ns_att_test.xml Parsing time: 164 ms Tags sorted in order of occurrence count (Highest first)
USING: Xpact XML parser (Eiffel) Parsing: libexpat/testdata/largefiles/ns_att_test.xml Parsing time: 133 ms Tags sorted in order of occurrence count (Highest first)
USING: eXpat XML parser (pure C) Parsing: libexpat/testdata/largefiles/recset.xml Parsing time: 144 ms Tags sorted in order of occurrence count (Highest first)
USING: Xpact XML parser (Eiffel) Parsing: libexpat/testdata/largefiles/recset.xml Parsing time: 124 ms Tags sorted in order of occurrence count (Highest first)
USING: eXpat XML parser (pure C) Parsing: libexpat/testdata/largefiles/wordnet_glossary-20010201.rdf Parsing time: 70 ms Tags sorted in order of occurrence count (Highest first)
USING: Xpact XML parser (Eiffel) Parsing: libexpat/testdata/largefiles/wordnet_glossary-20010201.rdf Parsing time: 65 ms Tags sorted in order of occurrence count (Highest first)
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Eiffel Users
Correcting an unfair advantage for eXpat tag counter
I just realized I unintentionally gave the expat tag counter an unfair advantage by compiling it as a single threaded application. After recompiling the Eiffel tag counter we now have a new set of benchmarks. (inlining set to 5)