Dear all, peace be with you.
At its inception, the media is meant to express a vivid reflection of our
daily life pursuits.
Supposedly, it discusses and analyzes what occurs on a daily basis.
One of the most constant controversies in the western media is the
deliberate negative portrayal of Muslims.
When it comes to Muslims and the media, you often are confronted with a
quite stereotypical depiction.
Everyday, I see the same biased headlines.
Jihadists committed terrorist acts, Moslems, which is a derogatory spelling
by the way, Moslems have engaged in terrorist acts, etc etc.
As a result, a moderately practicing Muslim is very frustrated because of
this deliberate negative portrayal.
It’s quite enough for a Muslim girl who wears Hijab to prejudicially
be labeled as extremist, suspicious and inexcusably mistrusted.
What do you expect the newsman
of CNN to tell you about Muslims?
Do you think he has any positive thing to tell?
Once upon a time, someone sent me an E-Mail with a reference to
an article on the Daily Mail press.
I innocently followed the link and it instantly promted an article
which talks about Islamic law permitting for the man to have intercourse with
the deadbody of his wife.
Of course, I was taken aback.
I was enormously appalled and disgusted.
I wrote him back and I unambiguously expressed my stridently deep
offense because of the disgustingly filthy article he sent.
In spite of the foul which this article contained, but this
generally signifies a quite negative delineation of what may some disinformed
people have about Islam and particularly in the western media.
In addition to that, Muslims are often subjected to accusatory
sentiments.
Whenever a terrorist act or a bombing incident occurs, the media flees to
accuse Muslims out of clear prejudice.
This prejudgement is essentially based on perfect
unenlightenment and without establishing decisive evidence.
This repetition was never spontaneous, it’s constantly deliberate.
Muslims are permanently expatriated from the mass western media.
They are not allowed to defend themselves or to refute the wicked
misconceptions which are viciously promoted about them.
I am predominantly exasperated when I hear this oblivious newsman
describing the debased cult of Isis as the Islamic State.
Excuse me sir, where did you get this fraud entitlement from?
I as a Muslim, I never recognized this debased cult as an Islamic
State.
It’s neither me nor any Muslim that I know have recognized this debased
cult.
It’s not more than a merely self-declared State.
It’s actually a hostile military dynasty of radical self-declared
counterfeit Islamists.
It absolutely has nothing to do with orthodox Islamists.
It desires to appallingly dominate the whole region with
its quite corrupted misapprehension of Islamic Shariah.
It’s not even a Caliphate because it doesn’t have the public recognition of
Muslims.
If you thoroughly examine the textbooks of Islamic Shariah, you will
properly be edified about that.
It’s quite fraudulent and it doesn’t sustain a territorial
jurisdiction upon us.
Another instance of how Islam has deliberately been misinterpreted in
the mass American media is when a controversially self-declared cleric or
whatever talks about Islamic law which allows men to beat their wives.
I just want to know where did they get this psychopathy from?
This is a repeatedly self-proclaimed scholarship but it doesn’t attain the
minimum endorsement of apposite erudition.
The media tends to often hyperbolize controversial characters to gravely
escalate the disposal of Islamophobia.
So for instance, when this distasteful pastor Terry Jones determined to
burn Korans out of desecration and intense detest on the anniversary of
September eleventh couple of years ago, he was sequentially interviewed by
multiple televisions.
I saw couple of his interviews on CNN, let alone other major broadcasting
networks.
I am wondering though;
Why this racist and radical religious bigot had to repeatedly be
interviewed?
Why he hadn’t just been utterly dismissed?
It seems to me that media people were quite obsessed with his
offensive bigotry and his radical intolerance.
Media people are constantly obsessed with repellant and opprobrious
contents.
What does make a regular headline about us in a western
press?
A bombing incident or a preposterously infamous celebrity attacking
us.
But a positive role-model for Muslims doesn’t make the top stories of major
western newspapers.
I am wondering why?
Why a disdainful 13 minutes movie trailer about prophet Muhammad was
constantly advertised in the mass media propagation whilst a gracious
documentary about the same subject was utterly dismissed?
What those people are attempting to achieve?
What those people want to show you?
They basically want those radicals such as Terry Jones, Robert Spencer,
Osama Bin Laden or Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini to often appear on
television.
They will never allow adequate Muslim scholars to talk about Islam.
They only allow those precipitously insane individuals to often
appear.
They are either uneducated and radical Muslims or they are radical
right-wing individuals who are fond of denouncing Islam out of detest and for
secular gains.
So neither, it’s radical anyway.
They won’t allow a Muslim scholar or a neutral non-Muslim figure to
speak.
Well, it’s the war then.
Yes, it’s a deliberately perpetrated mental combat.
They perpetually maintain this
irritation.
They uninterruptedly assault Islam without substantiating their
evidence.
Muslims are often subjected to provocative remarks which
generally intends to hassle them.
This harassment is never desultory but it’s rather purposive.
Muslims tend to constantly confront
vitriolic and detrimental sentiments in the western media.
The genuine scholarship of Islam is deliberately precluded and brudally
distorted in the western media.
So what about Arabic media and its role to counter this viciousness?
Well unfortunately, Arabic media is quite timid and diffident to even dare
speaking against their masters in the west.
But I am not timid, I am not manipulated with western authority, and
I will basically persist to courageously speak out against bigotry, imbecility,
intolerance, racism and deliberate prejudice.
I tend to hear those hellions condemning, criticizing and
calling for the ban of Shariah as well as Jihad, whilst at the
same time, they notoriously supply Israel with unlimited military
aid to savagely murder innocent civilians and to constantly threaten us with its
nuclear capability which is never condemned or inspected.
It’s deliberately dismissed by the international community including the
U.N.
Well then, they coldly call this sabotage a self-defense which is an
absolute blasphemy.
Well it’s a self-defense with White Phosphorus, heavy
weapons and eminent strikes with F-16.
I am now really convinced that it’s just a licit
self-defense.
In the subsequent segment, I am going to make a stridently repudiating
statements that aren’t necessarily very friendly.
Well first of all, I decisively discern that American people are not
affiliated with their government criminal acts.
Second, the western self-proclaimed preeminent strikes and waged war on
terror was in fact a geopolitical conflict for essentially temporal
interests.
These noble words of the shibboleth which advocates for counterterror and
so on were assumedly meant to settle the colonial occupation and to forcefully
impose cultural imperialism.
There must be a substantial deliberation to what the western media promotes
about the situation in the middle east and what about Muslims in particular,
because it’s mostly prejudicial and fallacious.
It’s quite convenient though to demonize Muslims out of irrational
fear and ignorance.
The demonization of us is essentially based
on a longstanding ties of historical hatred.
Since the time of the series of Crusades and the series of military
expeditions led by Chief, Knight and Monarch Richard the Lionheart, whilst the
west is in a constant precariousness with the Muslim world.
I myself am
not quite fond of this unstable situation but at the same time, I can’t
deny its factuality.
Simultaneously, I think it’s timely to transmigrate this hostile
disposition into further serenity and prosperity.
I never desired to have a hostile disposal with western people but at the
same time, I will not be dominated at their command.
I basically will never tolerate this unprecedented antagonism
and aggression.
I will never tolerate or forget the military invasion of Iraq and the total
destruction of this great nation.
I will never tolerate the hate incitement
rhetoric or the speech of superiority complex.
I basically will never tolerate or welcome someone who arrogantly thinks of
himself superior to me just because he is an American.
I will never tolerate someone who obliviously calls Jihad terrorism without
the least command of knowledge or the least development of theological
adequacy.
I will never tolerate self-appointed despotism which deceives people with a
fraudulent form of democracy.
You are not dictating your democracy on us.
We quite know how to live our lives prosperously.
At the same time, I am so proud to announce that my friends in the west are
quite tolerant and respectful.
They come from the United States and other western countries.
I have so many dear friends in Los Angeles and in other major provinces in
the United States.
I so much respect them, I respect their familys and friends whom they grew
up with.
I always respect cultural differences and I truly appreciate the social
philosophy of multiculturalism.
This is the respectful manner by which I look at the relationship between
the Muslim world and the western world.
I infinitely respect and honor the western culture, tradition and
upbringing, and I will continue inshallah to do so.
I again renew my call for pluralism and coexistence.
It’s the only way for this world to prosper.
If we continue to dismiss the demand to unfeignedly respect each other and
to stand for the liberty of one another, we will eventually end up in a
sempiternal conflict.
This conflict upholds to escalate because someone considers himself
superior to others for essentially his racial complect and his complexion.
I may sound a bit rough than the way I am expected to be.
I will continue to uphill my dignity and to advocate for my courage and my
allegiance to stand for truth.
In order to make this world more peaceful, we must mutually comply to
recognize deference and tolerance.
Otherwise, we will just be complying to a unilateral
policy.
That’s not how you seek for
serenity.
That’s a direct challenge against
someone’s ego and pride.
I can’t enforce the doctrine of humility on
those arrogance but I can incisively ensure they won’t practice it on me.
In order to earn my respect, you ought to respect me.
I called this essay the serene wounds, and it precisely signifies something
to me.
It signifies my perfect awareness of the conflict, its provenience and
essence.
At
the same time, I am firmly consistent in reconciling with people whom I consider
neither my foes nor my allies.
They still can be the latter though if we fathom how to build mutual
bridges with each other.
I hope I haven’t exhausted your attentiveness with that lengthy and
pedantic essay.
Thank you for patiently reading this, thank you for your time, care and
attention.
Thank you for respecting my standpoint.
I enthusiastically look forward to hearing from those who agree
as well as those who disagree with me.
Peace be with you.
Mostafa Almahdy.
________________________________________________