Equestrian without Steed, a strident scrutiny.
Mostafa
Today, we inshallah will thoroughly expatiate on the tremendous incident which has shifted the ground in terms of the provenience of the Israeli Palestinian conflict and consequently, between us and the western world. It is historically known as the Balfour Declaration. I don’t intend to desensitize, and at the same time, I have the right to tenaciously subsidize. My subsidy is a verbal one, and indeed, the word is mightier than the sword. I am going to determinedly continue on my strident repudiation against the Zionist malevolence, racism, and the staggeringly ignominious inequity. The latter is conspicuously notorious, it’s quite heard and beheld around the world, but unfortunately, without any considerable defiance. The Balfour Declaration is a crucial incident which sparked a globally massive confrontation. Great Britain had interests in the region, and after world war one, they have had to basically spiflicate the Ottoman Empire. The Turkish sultanate was a substantial obstacle to the British encroachment in the region and thus, it was absolutely necessary for British invaders to predominantly fraction the unified state into inconstant sectarian clans. The Zionist network had to diplomatically merchandize with the British authority, whilst bearing in their mind that establishing a Zionist state in Palestine is emphatically inalienable. The British were promptly keen to support and furnish a rebellion force against the Ottoman state which furiously erupted in Hedjaz and then, it uninterruptedly proceeded to the rest of the Arabian Peninsula, which later led to the end of the Ottoman era in 1924, as some (revisionists) controversially assert. The British support to the Zionist conspiracy was basically quite pervert and bizarre. Americans may have studied History and even they may have read dozens of textbooks on the subject but in the end, they struggle to really understand the inception of the flared conflict there, and they can barely discern much of it. It’s quite noticeable that the presented perspective for american audience on this subject is prejudicial and unilateral. In the mass American media, the portrayal of the Israeli Palestinian tensity isn’t eidetic as it suppose to be. The Republican slurred of supporting the pro Israel position is overwhelmingly infamous, and it incisively advocates for Israel’s right to defend itself, even if Israel obstinately continues to ironically dismiss the basically unquestionable human rights of Palestinians, even if Israel repeatedly uses white phosphorus, reprehensible air strikes, heavy tanks, and devastating bombs on merely civil targets. Israel is continuously armed with neuclear power and massively devastating weapons to basically murder innocent civilians on a daily basis. The U.S resumes to categorically veto resolutions in the U.N which basically pursuits for the favoritism of Israel’s condemnable terrorism, despite of the inhumanely circumstances in Gaza which frightfully continues to thrive until this moment. Incidentally, Muslim people are frustrated by the continuous neglectedness of their fainthearted rulers. Thus far, it’s quite natural to see Muslim extremist and radical movements appear. When oppression is practiced whilst defiance is basically precluded, it’s quite natural to see this result. The western military support to the Zionist savage and transgression in Palestine is tremendously violative. We are often portrayed in the western media as if we are violence instigators. This is quite a fanatic idea. I would like to ask a very simple question. Please, be honest if you choose to answer this. The United States often charges Russia of shamelessly violating international law. Well, how many international law Israel violated in the past decade? When the Lebanese refuge camp was dreadfully massacred by fortified Israelis in 1982, why this hasn’t been condemned? The western media is relentlessly portraying us as radical terrorists and haters by attempting to imply that all Muslims support ISIS. This is a sign of digression, fraudulence and obnoxiousness. ISIS isn’t an Islamic state, end of the debate. Well excuse me, are you going to forcefully impose on me how my religion should be? Are you going to amplify the radical movements and then say; well look, this is what Jihad is. I studied Islamic Shariah at the University, and I quite know what Jihad is. If some people insist to justify this dogmatism of unilaterally presenting the subject, then it would be quite inconsistent to meet for a dialog. I stated for million times, I don’t support Muslim extremism. I don’t support the killing of civilians. But at the same time, I basically will never prostrate to the western authority. I won’t allow to the influence of cultural imperialism to predominate my identity. Extremism is the natural consequence of military invasion, abasement, demonstration of arrogance, aggression, suppression, cultural dominance and subjection. I am not attempting to find an excuse for extremists. I am just dissecting the matter at hand. Western people often complain about being despised and even targeted. Whilst I truly forbid the use of belligerence to terrorize people, even if they themselves were pro Islamophobia activists. Simultaneously, I have the right to stridently react, to repudiate their prejudicial notion and to critically refute them. But I won’t think of threatening anyone with physical harm, as long as they use verbal arguments. If they fight with the word, I will defy with the word. If they hold the sword, I will defy with my sword. The western world has always been desiring to derogate us. This disposal in particular has got a massively firm historical incitement. I am quite henpecked of forcefully imposing a unilateral scenario which happened to be a merely western scenario. I am not confined at this point. I am free to think independently. I asked this question before and no one was able to give me a sufficiently convincing answer so far. In addition to this terrorist gang called ISIS, who supplies them with all of these weapons they possess? They are enormously equipped with frightfully ruinous artilleries, who supplies them? I believe it’s a quite valid question to ask, yet, it hasn’t been properly addressed, it has been neglected as a matter of fact. I invite you to suspend this obsession of media and to think a little. You should foresake this media habituation if you truly seek for truth. I call this essay equestrian without steed. That’s how I currently feel about myself. I am a courageous equestrian who hasn’t got an intrepid steed. I am utterly fearless to repudiate the western cultural dominance. But unfortunately, my Ummah is faint and timid. Most Muslims today are attempting to blindly imitate the western culture without making distinctions between what’s appropriate and what’s inappropriate. At the same time, our people started to have doubt about their right to defy against aggression when it comes to the western negative portrayal of Jihad. Well basically, they attempt to make our youth timid and powerless by discouraging them to even think of their total right to licitly defend their entity and identity against enemies. We can’t even think of arranging an infantry. That’s blasphemy. I am telling you the truth, this combat is for supremacy and for flawless victory. It will last for a quite long time. The western skeptic attitude toward us will never change. This conflict has a grave engraft in a direful history of intrusion for dominance and temporal interest. This history is filled with constant attempts of colonization and imperialism either culturally, economically, or even territorially. The British occupation to Egypt was a plain instance of this colonization in particular. In advanced of that, it was the French occupation in 1798. When French encroachers arrived to Egypt, Napoleon Bonaparte spoke to Egyptians whilst proclaiming that he didn’t come to invade Egypt and he truly respects prophet Muhammad and the Koran. He basically attempted to viciously appeal them by deceptively provoking their religious emotion. It was the same thing that Obama did when he spoke to us in 2009 from Cairo University. He spoke with provoking the religious sensationary of his indoctrinated poor audience. He greeted people with the Islamic greeting in Arabic, he occasionally quoted what sounded like English translations of the Noble Koran, he fallaciously spoke positively about Islam whilst he factually adheres a hostile disposal against it and he claimed that his country is not at a war with Islam. From its appearance alone, it looks splendiferous. But we know quite well that Obama wasn’t more than a politician, an American politician who practices knavery, duplicity and fallacy. Someone is quite in bewilderment to believe what politicians speak. They prettify their speech with incredible rhetoric, so it’s most likely to effectively convince. With my sobar determination, I am inshallah courageous to implement all assets at my disposal to defy against verbal aggression and prejudice. The detestably hostile disposition against us is enormously growing. It’s all about colonizing us and to utterly deter our tendency to decline anything which is brought from the western culture and their exportation. Islam will continually be subjected to unprecedented hostility. They hate Islam and it's absolutely notorious. Therefore, we are religiously obliged to respond with edification, enlightenment, intellectual development, certainty and perseverance. Islam will uninterruptedly be subjected to deliberate fabrication and denouncement. The primary cause for that is the union between christian and secular societies which aims to predominantly occidentalize our identity. Western Christians have broadly agreed to harmoniously coincide with seculars who mostly happened to be irreligious entities. They consist of atheists and agnostics altogether. They agreed to constantly flurry us by evoking theological controversies. They willingly chose to act as Islam unparalleled opponent. They denationalize, they devastate and they deliberately demonize Islamic principles. Their argument continues to even explicitly utter blasphemy. This hostile banner is reinstated by mainstream protestant ministers and their major secular allies. They have their ideology and agenda is here to insistently assert and to forcefully impose. Islam will continually be misjudged, misinterpreted and misrepresented. As Muslims, we have to persistently confront this desecration. We are being furiously fought in our religion. The conspiratorial series will proceed to gradually unfold. Therefore, we have to be quite attentive and careful. Our response has to wisely be respectful, though a bit strident but never disdainful. My friend Colin asked me about the royal family of the Saudi wahaby dynasty, and their ability to regulate the country with such cruelty. I mostly agree with you Colin. The Wahaby sect is critically considered to be one of the most conservative segments of the Muslim Orthodox practice. But I frankly admit its fall into a wide range of conservative opinions and strange fatwas sometimes. I consider myself a moderately practicing Orthodox Muslim, and I disagree with some of the Saudi fatwas on various issues. I disagree with them on their strict rulings of the face veil, their total refusal for women to acquire driving licenses, and their humiliation of people by publicly disciplining them even if they were criminals. Well still, that doesn’t give them a licit justification to brutally mortify individuals who are human beings after all. I would like to take advantage of this opportunity to simply present the pure essence of Islam.
It’s quite strange when Islam is being continuously slandered and ridiculed, it’s described as an oppressive and intolerant religion, whilst edified people still come to felicitously embrace it in impressively significant manner. It would have been more logical and convincing if this negative propaganda has frustrated people until they eventually abandon Islam. Even when many Muslims themselves are not sufficiently practicing Islam but, the religion isn’t blamed for those who misrepresent its essence. Islam has constantly been provoked and demonized by those who hate its message. Amongst those are pastors and ministers. They deliberately distort the reality of Islam, they heavily attempt to demolish its expedience for their temporal gains. Consequently, Allah bestows His bounty on those who look for truth and guidance despite of any relevant circumstances. Islam is never what they tend to promote. However, they unashamedly will attempt to denigrate Islam out of envy and detest. We therefore should regain our focus on presenting Islam with sensibility, wisdom, intellectual development, refinement, ultimate forbearance, certitude and placid temperament. Islam is the most hated and the most widely opposed religion in the west today, yet it’s broadly embraced amongst well educated westerns. These are two interesting phenomenons. Despite of the preposterous portrayal which is often presented by hateful comedians such as Terry Jones and Robert Spencer, inshallah, Islam will victoriously prevail. Those are just vulgarr clowns. I am ordained to basically expose the demonstrative fallacy of those Islamophobia pro activists. It’s notoriously recognized that the pursuit of deadly defaming Islam is in fact a quite profitable business. Those hate incitement sentiments are often pronounced by hateful american televangelists. When we talk about Islamophobia, we don’t really mean the casual conversation of agreeing and disagreeing on certain points in a discussion. It goes beyond the boundaries of tolerance to a quite eminent level of incisive hostility. We all know that Judaism is hijacked by zionists and Christianity in the west in particular is hijacked to justify what Israel does in Palestine. If someone attempted to criticize Judaism, he will instantly be labeled as antisemitic. We all know what Hitler did during the second worldwide war. Hitler was a Christian. No one said that Christianity is the religion of Nazi dictators. Christians will be quite offended if someone attempted to assault them as such. But, it’s no problem at all for anyone to insistently marginalise Muslims. These are some repeatedly posed hate sentiments which are intended to do so. Islam is spread by the sword. Women are subjected to suppression. Prophet Muhammad was a child molester and a pedophile. Islam calls for terrorism and it justifys the use of violence to conquer the world. It will be quite inconsistent for me to yell at those hate mongers. They won’t listen to me anyway. I declare my determination to verbally engage with them to defy their aggression and to purely present my religion to unbiased people. Islamophobia is a booming reality for promoting stereotypes. Those pro hate monger televangelists, they primarily rely on the use of excess to basically yell at us in hate. Islamophobia has furiously been expended to predominantly sabotage us. Islamophobia reared in its ugly hat, to the extent that they call for the ban of Saudi people to enter America. Yes, those are your media people, I myself heard them calling for this on many occasions. Just a side note, because we can’t mention Saudi Arabia without expressing our heartfelt commiserations to Saudi people for the loss of the well-regarded monarch, King Abdullah. May the Grace of Allah be bestowed on him. I just mentioned my disagreement with some Saudi clerics and mofties but at the same time, I should take into consideration the crucially major role of Saudi Arabia in the region either religiously or economically. On economical basis, Saudi Arabia is a quite significant business partner for the west since it’s recognized as one of the worldwide top oil producers and exporters. Saudi Arabia will never be judged based on your definition of political freedom. Conservatism is a political orientation which the Saudi regime considers sufficiently apposite to govern their state. The western world must cease interfering into our domestic affairs. Why it is legit to France to ban Hijab whilst it’s barbaric in Saudi to ban women from acquiring driving licenses. By the way, I don’t necessarily agree with this attitude but it’s their country remember? This is the western problem to be quite specific. They are obsessed by forcefully imposing their version of democracy and liberty on the rest of the world. It’s the globalization project which doesn’t limit itself to economical interests, but it will certainly exceed to farther degrees of cultural ascendency. In conclusion then, this essay is intended to unambiguously express my strident repudiation against the western cultural dominance. I totally refuse any interference in our affairs. We won’t be trammeled in your comfort zone for dominance and subjection. We have our own values, morals and methods of assessment. I quite appreciate the intercultural communication between us but, I certainly decline the deliberate interference in our affairs. The world will be more prosperous if everyone respects what others have. The bottom line is based on mutual respect. The word is not at the possession of the west. The west has much to do. At least, they may regain their reputation. The west supplied and developed the terror elements of Al-Qa'ida, the Taleban militia and Isis. The United States supplied Taleban militarily to fight against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. They developed its military power for their interest whilst they quite recognize that as they used it to fight against Russia, well technically, the former Soviet Union, they would use it again to somehow justify their grave intrusion in the region. I wish the west would enforce on Israel to respect international law, I wish they would sanction and condemn Israel for continuously developing nuclear arsenals the way they do with Iran, North Korea, possibly Russia and Venezuela. With the Grace of Allah, I am done with this essay. I look forward to hearing your feedback. Thank you for your time, thank you for your attention, and thank you for your courtesy.