[meta-efibootguard][PATCH] Add LAYERSERIES_COMPAT

[Pascal Bach]

This is required for sumo and newer.

The current version is tested with rocko and sumo.

Signed-off-by: Pascal Bach <pasca...@siemens.com>
---
conf/layer.conf | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
index 3226d73..0579cda 100644
--- a/conf/layer.conf
+++ b/conf/layer.conf
@@ -16,3 +16,5 @@ BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes-*/*/*.bb \
BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "efibootguard"
BBFILE_PATTERN_efibootguard = "^${LAYERDIR}/"
BBFILE_PRIORITY_efibootguard = "6"
+
+LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_efibootguard = "rocko sumo"
--
2.11.0

[Andreas Reichel]

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:03:47AM +0200, [ext] Pascal Bach wrote:
> This is required for sumo and newer.

I think this is recommended, but not required.

AR

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "EFI Boot Guard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to efibootguard-d...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to efibootg...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/efibootguard-dev/20180919090347.27552-1-pascal.bach%40siemens.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Andreas Reichel
Dipl.-Phys. (Univ.)
Software Consultant

Andreas...@tngtech.com, +49-174-3180074
TNG Technology Consulting GmbH, Betastr. 13a, 85774 Unterfoehring
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henrik Klagges, Dr. Robert Dahlke, Gerhard Mueller
Sitz: Unterfoehring * Amtsgericht Muenchen * HRB 135082

[Bach, Pascal]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Reichel <andreas.r...@siemens.com>
> Sent: Mittwoch, 19. September 2018 11:09
> To: Bach, Pascal (BT CPS R&D ZG FW CCP) <pasca...@siemens.com>
> Cc: efibootg...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [meta-efibootguard][PATCH] Add LAYERSERIES_COMPAT
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:03:47AM +0200, [ext] Pascal Bach wrote:
> > This is required for sumo and newer.
>
> I think this is recommended, but not required.
>

You are right it's not strictly required. But it produces an ugly warning if not set.

[Andreas Reichel]

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:27:37AM +0200, Bach, Pascal (BT CPS R&D ZG FW CCP) wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andreas Reichel <andreas.r...@siemens.com>
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 19. September 2018 11:09
> > To: Bach, Pascal (BT CPS R&D ZG FW CCP) <pasca...@siemens.com>
> > Cc: efibootg...@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [meta-efibootguard][PATCH] Add LAYERSERIES_COMPAT
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:03:47AM +0200, [ext] Pascal Bach wrote:
> > > This is required for sumo and newer.
> >
> > I think this is recommended, but not required.
> >
> You are right it's not strictly required. But it produces an ugly warning if not set.
>

Thanks for the patch :)

[Jan Kiszka]

Thanks, applied to next.

Jan

--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

[Bach, Pascal]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.k...@siemens.com>
> Sent: Mittwoch, 19. September 2018 14:12
> To: Bach, Pascal (BT CPS R&D ZG FW CCP) <pasca...@siemens.com>;
> efibootg...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [meta-efibootguard][PATCH] Add LAYERSERIES_COMPAT
>

> On 19.09.18 11:03, [ext] Pascal Bach wrote:
> > This is required for sumo and newer.
> >
> > The current version is tested with rocko and sumo.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pascal Bach <pasca...@siemens.com>
> > ---
> > conf/layer.conf | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf index 3226d73..0579cda
> > 100644
> > --- a/conf/layer.conf
> > +++ b/conf/layer.conf
> > @@ -16,3 +16,5 @@ BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes-*/*/*.bb \
> > BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "efibootguard"
> > BBFILE_PATTERN_efibootguard = "^${LAYERDIR}/"
> > BBFILE_PRIORITY_efibootguard = "6"
> > +
> > +LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_efibootguard = "rocko sumo"
> >
>
> Thanks, applied to next.

I forgot to mention that this layer is only compatible with sumo together with the other changes on next, like the 0.4 upgrade etc.

Pascal

[Jan Kiszka]

That should be the case, given that I applied on top of those commits :). If
not, let me know - I personally don't have test case for the Yocto build in
reach at this point (will hopefully change during October/November).