Please find below a postdoctoral position in Krakow that may be of interest to those working on social epistemology.
A common trope in contemporary public culture is that privilege is
everywhere. Men, white people, affluent people, the inhabitants of the
global North, sometimes the young and sometimes (more often) the old,
able-bodied individuals, people in heteronormative
relationships or that are not LGBTQ+, have all been described as
privileged. We usually think there is something wrong with that: if
there is a privilege, some people do not have what others do or have
very little of what others have in abundance.
The OPUS project “From Wrongs to Privileges: Moral, Economic, Epistemic
Perspectives” sets itself three objectives: (1) arriving at a
general definition of privilege, which may make sense of
privilege’s perceived injustice and ubiquity, (2) identifying how
privilege plays out in different areas, employing economic and epistemic
privilege as the main case studies, and (3) discussing
the normative response, in terms of both interpersonal and
institutional duties, to privilege.
We are now looking for a 2-year postdoctoral researcher that can
assist in part (2) of the project. When dealing with epistemic privilege
specifically, there are two main issues to be dispelled. The first
concerns the
best definition of epistemic privilege, where the latter is
understood not just as the product of injustice but something we object
in itself. The second concerns whether its
wrongness is purely epistemic, or moral, or a combination of the two.
We envisage the collaboration to take place in three stages. In the
first stage, the PI and the postdoctoral researcher will exchange ideas
from each other’s area of expertise regarding the core theme. Questions
we expect to be discussed in this initial stage
concern the plausibility of the distributive framework in epistemic
injustice, the relationship between specific epistemological accounts
(such as reductionism about testimony) and specific theses in the ethics
of beliefs (such as doxastic wrongs), and the
role of practical reasons for belief. In the second stage, the PI and
the postdoc will assess which areas of investigation can be conducted
individually and which collectively. In the third stage, the PI and the
postdoc will work together on one or two co-authored
papers. The postdoc will be encouraged to further produce work on any
topic of their choice which is connected either to epistemic privilege
specifically or to epistemic injustice more generally.
We are looking for a recently graduated PhD (PhD degree within 7 years before 1 January of the year of employment) or somebody who may have their PhD by October 2025 who meets the following criteria:
-
Academic expertise primarily in epistemology, specifically in the
debates over testimony and epistemic justification and/or pragmatic
encroachment and the role of pragmatic reasons for belief;
-
Willingness to work for a project at the intersection of epistemology
and moral philosophy, and specifically on (i) the idea of an epistemic
form of privilege and (ii) its epistemological underpinnings and (iii)
the relationship between epistemic injustice
(and specifically testimonial injustice) and the epistemology of
interpersonal testimony.
-
An updated cv with publications;
-
Abstract of PhD dissertation (in English);
-
One independent research paper, published or unpublished, on themes the candidate believes are relevant for the topic;
-
A brief (one-page long) statement of research purposes, in which the
candidate suggests their expected contributions to the project;
-
Names and email address of two academic references, who may be contacted at later stages (can be included in the cv).
We expect to interview shortlisted candidates by mid June 2025. The post is scheduled to commence on 1st October 2025.